《狼图腾》不同版本的称谓语比较研究

发布时间：2019-02-15 12:48

【摘要】：语言是人类思维工具、交际媒介、文化载体。称谓语作为语言词汇系统的重要组成部分,在交际中有着开场作用。跨文化交流中文化背景的不同而导致称谓语的使用也有所不同。本论文通过对《狼图腾》不同版本的称谓语比较研究,从跨文化传播学的角度解析了《狼图腾》不同版本的称谓语。本论文由前言、正文和总结三个部分组成。前言部分交代了选题原因及资料、研究目标、资料来源及研究方法、称谓语的研究概况及《狼图腾》的不同版本、称谓语、翻译与人物角色和跨文化传播的关系。正文第一章运用统计法,统计和分析了《狼图腾》不同版本的称谓语使用情况。第二章通过对汉语成人版、蒙古文版、吉里尔文版的《狼图腾》称谓语之间的比较,探索了这些版本中称谓语使用情况的共性与特性。第三章综合运用了文献内容分析法和采访法,从民族、国家以及地域三个层次,分析了不同版本《狼图腾》中称谓语使用特征形成的原因。本文研究论点可以归纳为：第一,《狼图腾》五个版本中一共出现了8种亲属称谓语、18种社会称谓语和2种绰号。第二,《狼图腾》五个版本中的共性：(1)区分使用称呼语和称谓语(2)称谓语因语境的变化而变多(3)将亲属称谓语用做社会称谓语(4)随尊称语使用的差异称谓语的变体也会增加。第三,在《狼图腾》汉语版和蒙古文版中,使用亲属称谓语时明显地区分了辈分,在社会称谓语中,称呼对方时不仅使用名字的简称而且突出表达权力距离的特点。第四,吉里尔文版本中使用亲属称谓语时生动的展现出年龄和性别差异,在交际中不用简称而用全称,也不注重权力距离。第五,不同版本的《狼图腾》中称谓语的使用因受众的文化背景不同而形成了各自特点。第六,从民族(蒙、汉)、国家(中、蒙)和地域(内蒙古东西部)三个层次,探析了《狼图腾》不同版本的称谓语使用特征形成的文化背景。
[Abstract]:Language is a tool of human thinking, a medium of communication and a carrier of culture. As an important part of the lexical system, address plays an opening role in communication. Different cultural backgrounds lead to different use of appellations in cross-cultural communication. Based on the comparative study of different versions of the appellations in Wolf Totem, this paper analyzes the different versions of the appellations from the perspective of cross-cultural communication. This thesis consists of three parts: preface, text and summary. The preface explains the reasons and materials, the research objectives, the sources and methods of the research, the general situation of the study of appellations and the different versions of Wolf Totem, the relationship between appellations, translation, characters and cross-cultural communication. The first chapter uses statistical method to analyze the use of different versions of appellations in Wolf Totem. In the second chapter, by comparing the appellations of the Chinese adult version, the Mongolian version and the Giri version of Wolf Totem, the author explores the commonness and characteristics of the use of the appellations in the Chinese adult version, the Mongolian version and the Giri version. The third chapter synthetically uses the literature content analysis method and the interview method, from the nationality, the country and the region three levels, has analyzed the different edition "wolf totem" in the appellation use characteristic formation reason. The thesis can be summarized as follows: first, there are 8 kinship terms, 18 social appellations and 2 nicknames in the five versions of Wolf Totem. Second The commonness in the five versions of Wolf Totem: (1) differentiating the use of address terms from appellations (2) the number of appellations becomes more and more because of the change of context, (3) making the pragmatics of kinship appellations into social appellations (4) the difference with the use of honours. The variety of different appellations will also increase. Thirdly, in the Chinese version and Mongolian version of Wolf Totem, the relative appellations are obviously distinguished. In the social appellations, they not only use the abbreviation of the first name but also highlight the characteristics of expressing the power distance. Fourthly, the use of kinship appellations in Giri's version vividly shows the difference between age and sex. In communication, the full name is used instead of abbreviations, and the distance of power is not emphasized. Fifth, the use of address terms in different versions of Wolf Totem forms its own characteristics according to the cultural background of the audience. Sixth, from the three levels of nationality (Mongolia, Han), state (middle, Mongolia) and region (east and west of Inner Mongolia), this paper analyzes the cultural background of different versions of "Wolf Totem".
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H030

【相似文献】