关联理论视角下对隐性冲突话语中反讽理解的研究

发布时间：2019-05-30 07:27

【摘要】：反讽(irony)表达的是与说者的真实意图相反的内容,常暗示贬抑态度或评价。关联理论是关于话语理解的认知语用学理论,西班牙学者Yus在关联理论的基础上分析了反讽理解中的七类语境假设(contextual assumptions)。隐性冲突话语是“交际双方在交际目的冲突的情况下,以隐蔽的方式表达各自目的的话语”。现有的隐性冲突话语研究只是将反讽描述为一种掩盖交际目的的“面纱”,尚未涉及反讽的理解过程。本文在关联理论和Yus反讽理解框架的基础上,探讨隐性冲突话语中反讽的理解过程,依据语料分析建立隐性冲突话语中的反讽理解模型。首先,我们从经典的影视文学作品中收集了26个包含反讽的隐性冲突话语语料,然后,从听者角度对反讽的理解过程进行了分析。结果发现:Yus的七类语境假设只有六类在隐性冲突话语中出现;不过,在隐性冲突话语中还出现了一类新的语境假设——后续话语。因此,隐性冲突话语中反讽的理解也涉及七类语境假设,分别是:1)百科及事实信息(encyclopedic and factual information);2)说者的非言语行为(speaker’s nonverbal behavior);3)听者具备的关于说者的背景知识(hearer’s background knowledge of speaker’s biographical data);4)互知信息(mutual knowledge);5)前序话语(previous utterances;6)后续话语(subsequent utterances);7)语言线索(linguistic cues)。以上七类语境假设在反讽理解过程中所起作用并不完全相同,其中第三类和第四类起主导作用,其他五类起支撑作用。据本文统计,以上七类语境假设在语料中所占比重分别是15%、23%、100%、100%、8%、23%和12%。基于以上,本研究建立了隐性冲突话语中反讽的理解模型。
[Abstract]:Irony (irony) expresses the opposite of the speaker's true intention, often implying derogatory attitude or evaluation. Relevance theory is the cognitive pragmatic theory of discourse understanding. On the basis of relevance theory, Spanish scholar Yus analyzes seven types of contextual assumptions (contextual assumptions). In ironic understanding. Implicit conflict discourse is "both sides of communication express their own purpose discourse in a covert way in the case of communicative purpose conflict". The existing implicit conflict discourse research only describes irony as a "veil" covering up the purpose of communication, and has not yet involved the process of understanding irony. On the basis of relevance theory and Yus irony understanding framework, this paper discusses the understanding process of irony in implicit conflict discourse, and establishes an irony understanding model in implicit conflict discourse according to corpus analysis. First of all, we collect 26 hidden conflict discourse corpus containing irony from the classical film and television literature works, and then analyze the understanding process of irony from the listener's point of view. The results show that only six of the seven types of contextual hypotheses of Yus appear in implicit conflict discourse, but there is also a new kind of contextual hypothesis in implicit conflict discourse-follow-up discourse. Therefore, the understanding of irony in implicit conflict discourse also involves seven types of contextual assumptions, namely: 1) encyclopedia and factual information (encyclopedic and factual information); 2) the nonverbal act (speaker's nonverbal behavior); of the speaker. 3) background knowledge of the speaker (hearer's background knowledge of speaker's biographical data); 4) Mutual knowledge (mutual knowledge); 5) Preface discourse (previous utterances;6) follow-up discourse (subsequent utterances); 7) language clue (linguistic cues). The above seven types of contextual assumptions play different roles in the process of ironic understanding, among which the third category and the fourth category play a leading role, while the other five categories play a supporting role. According to the statistics of this paper, the proportion of the above seven contextual assumptions in the corpus is 15%, 23%, 100%, 100%, 8%, 23% and 12%, respectively. Based on the above, this study establishes an understanding model of irony in implicit conflict discourse.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H030

【参考文献】