相同的语体，不同的声音—政府工作民间报告和正式报告的互文性分析

发布时间：2019-06-20 11:21

【摘要】：近年来，民众参与政府工作的积极性得到了很大的提高，民众的声音也越来越频繁地出现在了政府工作决策中。2010年5月31日，一年一度的深圳市政府工作报告问世，同一时间，南方都市报也发表了一篇名为“2010年深圳市政府工作民间报告”的文章。两篇报告结构相同，内容方面也有重复，但却明显存在着不同的关注点。本研究的语料包括“2010年深圳市政府工作报告”和“2010年深圳市政府工作民间报告”。语料来源可靠，分别来自“深圳市政府官方网站”及《南方都市报》。本研究主要基于批评性语篇分析中的互文性理论，建立一个综合性的分析框架，阐释并回答了“在共同的话题下，两篇报告分别有哪些不同的关注点”及“这些关注点是如何通过话语进行建构的”两大研究问题，以此揭示话语在社会生活中的重要作用。本研究采用的互文性理论主要包括辛斌的具体互文性和体裁互文性两个方面；批评性语篇分析理论主要采用的是Wodak的语篇历史分析方法。文本分析部分主要包括两个方面：词汇对比分析和整体结构分析。词汇对比分析部分主要从批评性语篇分析中的“语篇”、“意识形态”及“体裁互文性”等角度进行分析，展现了两篇报告的不同关注点。整体结构分析部分主要基于Wodak的语篇历史分析步骤，，探讨不同话语策略的运用，揭示了两篇报告是如何建构了不同的关注点。分析结果表明：（1）正式的政府工作报告关注的是已经完成的，更宏观的问题，而政府工作民间报告关注的则是拖建一直未完成，更细致的问题。（2）政府部门利用其权力缩小自己工作的不足；民众则希望借助民间报告的形式放大自己的声音，他们各自使用不同的话语策略，从而实现了对这些不同关注点的建构。理论层面上，本研究希望能丰富批评性语篇分析的相关研究，并为政府工作报告的相关研究提供一个可行的研究视角；应用层面上，希望政府部门能看到该如何才能更好的服务于人民，从而建立一种和谐民主的社会关系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the enthusiasm of the people to participate in the work of the government has been greatly improved, and the voices of the people have appeared more and more frequently in the decision-making of the government work. On May 31, 2010, the annual work report of the Shenzhen Municipal Government was published. At the same time, the Southern Metropolis Daily also published an article entitled "2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work Folk report." The structure of the two reports is the same and the content is duplicated, but there are obviously different concerns. The corpus of this study includes the 2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work report and the 2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work Folk report. The source of the corpus is reliable, from the official website of Shenzhen Municipal Government and the Southern Metropolis Daily. Based on the intertextuality theory in critical discourse analysis, this study establishes a comprehensive analytical framework, explains and answers "what are the different concerns of the two reports under the common topic" and "how these concerns are constructed through discourse", so as to reveal the important role of discourse in social life. The intertextuality theory used in this study mainly includes two aspects: Xin Bin's specific intertextuality and genre intertextuality, and critical discourse analysis theory mainly adopts Wodak's approach to discourse history analysis. The part of text analysis mainly includes two aspects: lexical contrastive analysis and overall structure analysis. The part of lexical contrastive analysis mainly analyzes "discourse", "ideology" and "genre intertextuality" in critical discourse analysis, and shows the different concerns of the two reports. The whole structure analysis part is mainly based on Wodak's steps of discourse history analysis, discusses the use of different discourse strategies, and reveals how the two reports construct different concerns. The results show that: (1) the formal government work report pays attention to the completed and macroscopical problems, while the government work folk report pays attention to the problem that the procrastination has not been completed and is more detailed. (2) the government departments use their power to reduce the shortage of their work; People want to amplify their voices in the form of folk reports, each using different discourse strategies, thus realizing the construction of these different concerns. On the theoretical level, this study hopes to enrich the relevant research of critical discourse analysis and provide a feasible research perspective for the relevant research of government work reports; at the application level, it is hoped that government departments can see how to better serve the people so as to establish a harmonious and democratic social relationship.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H15

【参考文献】