基于心理词汇的中国人的价值观结构兼与施瓦茨跨文化价值观理论的比较
发布时间：2021-02-28 08:28
“在个体层面，价值观表达宽泛的跨情境的动机目标，影响着个体对情境、偏好、选择以及行动的解释”（Knafo, Roccas,&Sagiv,2011），对价值观的跨文化研究是跨文化交际研究的内核之一。跨文化心理学视角下的价值观研究主要从个体和国家/文化层面这两个层面上发现价值观结构或维度的差异与共性（如Hofstede,1980,2010；Schwartz,1992,2006a; Schwartz et al.,2012）。进入新世纪，运用心理词汇法针对具体文化与语言中的价值观结构的本位研究不断兴起，以发现价值观结构中的具体文化特性（如Aavik&Allik,2002; Renner,2003a; De Raad&Van Oudenhoven,2008）。在这样的理论背景下，本研究运用本土心理学和跨文化心理学的视角，试图以中国语汇为价值观研究的起点，采用心理词汇法开发本土的价值观调查问卷，以90后中国大学生群体为样本总体，试图自下而上建构契合中国文化语境的价值观结构，并与施瓦茨提出的具有跨文化普遍性的价值观结构进行比较，以揭示中国人价值观结构中的文化特性。心理词汇法...
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：235 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Abbreviations
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Motivation of the study
1.2 Purpose of the study
1.3 Significance of the study
1.3.1 Theoretical significance
1.3.2 Methodological significance
1.3.3 Practical significance
1.4 Research gaps
1.5 Organization of the dissertation
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Key constructs
2.2.1 Culture: Which aspect and what level?
2.2.2 Values
2.2.2.1 Defining values
2.2.2.2 Relationships between values and other constructs
2.2.2.3 Sources of values
2.3 Culture and values
2.4 Values, language, and lexicon
2.5 Fundamental methodological issues in studying values
2.5.1 Levels of analysis
2.5.2 Etic and/or emic
2.5.3 Quantitative and/or qualitative
2.5.4 Data elicitation methods
2.5.5 Sources of value descriptors in major surveys
2.5.6 Analytic techniques in the empirical studies of values
2.6 Chinese-values studies in Chinese societies
2.6.1 Review studies of Chinese values in China’s mainland
2.6.2 Empirical studies of Chinese values in China’s mainland
2.6.3 Empirical studies of Chinese values in non-Mainland China
2.7 Etic frameworks for comparing cultures
2.7.1 Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s values orientation theory
2.7.2 Rokeach’s values theory
2.7.3 Hofstede’s 6-D cultural dimensions
2.7.4 Michael Bond’s CVS studies （1987; 1988）
2.7.5 Schwartz’s cross-cultural values theory
2.8 A lexical approach to values
2.8.1 Lexical hypothesis
2.8.2 Lexical approach to personality studies
2.8.3 Lexical approach to values dimensions in six cultures
2.9 Critical evaluation
2.9.1 Statement of problems in previous Chinese values studies
2.9.2 Research hypotheses and questions
2.10 Chapter summary
Chapter Three: Research Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Study One: Development of Lexically-based Chinese Values Inventory （LCVI）
3.2.1 Dictionary of Modern Chinese as source of values items
3.2.2 Extraction procedures of value descriptors
3.2.2.1 Stage One: Establishing a preliminary list of values descriptors by direct extraction
3.2.2.2 Stage Two: Establishing a preliminary list of values descriptors by indirect extraction
3.2.2.3 Stage Three: Comparing direct extraction with indirect extraction
3.2.2.4 Stage Four: Open-ended survey elicitation
3.2.2.5 Stage Five: Further reduction by elimination of synonyms and blending of synonyms
3.2.2.6 Stage Six: Rating the list
3.2.3 The pilot study
3.2.3.1 Research purpose
3.2.3.2 Participants
3.2.3.3 Procedure
3.2.3.4 Revision of the LCVI
3.2.4 Comparison with other questionnaires
3.3 Study Two: Structuring the domain of Chinese values
3.3.1 Research questions
3.3.2 Participants
3.3.3 Instruments
3.3.4 Data collection
3.3.5 Data analysis
3.3.6 Results
3.3.6.1 Descriptive statistics
3.3.6.2 Five factors of Chinese values
3.3.6.3 Replication of the factorial structure
3.3.6.4 Sub-dimensions of the five factors
3.3.6.5 Construction of the Lexically-based Chinese Values Survey （LCVS）
3.3.6.6 Correlation between scales and/or sub-scales
3.3.6.7 Gender differences for five factors and ten sub-factors
3.4 Study Three: Confirmatory factor analysis
3.4.1 Participants
3.4.2 Model construction for the LCVS
3.4.3 Goodness of fit of the Model
3.4.4 Path model for each factor
3.5 Study Four: Relating to SVS value domains
3.5.1 Smallest Space Analysis of the SVS items
3.5.2 Smallest Space Analysis of LCVS items
3.5.3 Correlations of LCVS scales and SVS value domains
3.5.4 Relations between the LCVS and the SVS
3.5.4.1 Partial correlations of the LCVS with the SVS value domains
3.5.4.2 Correlations of the LCVS with the SVS value domains
3.6 Chapter summary
Chapter Four: Summary of Results and General Discussion
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Summary of results
4.3 General discussion
4.3.1 Establishment of the Lexically-based Chinese Values Inventory
4.3.2 Emergence of a five-factor and 10 sub-factors model of Chinese values
4.3.3 Comparison with Schwartz’s values theory
4.4 Chapter summary
Chapter Five: Conclusion
5.1 Major contributions
5.2 Implications
5.3 Research limitations
5.4 Suggestions for future research
5.5 Chapter summary
References
Appendices
Appendix 1: Evolution of the SVS from the RVS and the CVS
Appendix 2: Open-ended survey question and results
Appendix 3: The Chinese Values Inventory （LCVI）
Appendix 4: SVS codings for the SSA
Appendix 5: Match of the LCVI with CVS （CCC, 1987） and NCVS （Kulich, 1997; 1998）
Appendix 6: Factor loadings of 315 value items in the PCA
Appendix 7: LCVS and coding
Appendix 8: SSA analysis of SVS items
Appendix 9: SSA analysis of LCVS items
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]对外传播中的共享性中华核心价值观[J]. 关世杰. 人民论坛·学术前沿. 2012(15)
[2]价值观取向理论结构及实证[J]. 王晓钧,张文慧,王海平. 应用心理学. 2012(01)
[3]基于动机的人类基础价值观理论研究——Schwartz价值观理论和研究述评[J]. 张敏,邓希文. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版). 2012(01)
[4]问卷调查法在跨文化交际研究中的应用创新[J]. 李加军. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版). 2011(02)
[5]当代中国人价值观的结构与特点[J]. 金盛华,郑建君,辛志勇. 心理学报. 2009(10)
[6]大学生传统人际价值观的探索性与验证性研究[J]. 张苹平,张进辅. 心理学探新. 2009(03)
[7]中国青年人生价值观初探[J]. 徐华春,郑涌,黄希庭. 西南大学学报(社会科学版). 2008(05)
[8]中学生价值观问卷的编制及其结构验证[J]. 金盛华,孙雪飞,郑建君. 应用心理学. 2008(02)
[9]中外价值观研究述评[J]. 唐文清,张进辅. 心理科学. 2008(03)
[10]今日的跨文化交际研究向何处去?[J]. 顾嘉祖. 中国外语. 2008(01)
本文编号：3055586
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：235 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Abbreviations
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Motivation of the study
1.2 Purpose of the study
1.3 Significance of the study
1.3.1 Theoretical significance
1.3.2 Methodological significance
1.3.3 Practical significance
1.4 Research gaps
1.5 Organization of the dissertation
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Key constructs
2.2.1 Culture: Which aspect and what level?
2.2.2 Values
2.2.2.1 Defining values
2.2.2.2 Relationships between values and other constructs
2.2.2.3 Sources of values
2.3 Culture and values
2.4 Values, language, and lexicon
2.5 Fundamental methodological issues in studying values
2.5.1 Levels of analysis
2.5.2 Etic and/or emic
2.5.3 Quantitative and/or qualitative
2.5.4 Data elicitation methods
2.5.5 Sources of value descriptors in major surveys
2.5.6 Analytic techniques in the empirical studies of values
2.6 Chinese-values studies in Chinese societies
2.6.1 Review studies of Chinese values in China’s mainland
2.6.2 Empirical studies of Chinese values in China’s mainland
2.6.3 Empirical studies of Chinese values in non-Mainland China
2.7 Etic frameworks for comparing cultures
2.7.1 Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s values orientation theory
2.7.2 Rokeach’s values theory
2.7.3 Hofstede’s 6-D cultural dimensions
2.7.4 Michael Bond’s CVS studies （1987; 1988）
2.7.5 Schwartz’s cross-cultural values theory
2.8 A lexical approach to values
2.8.1 Lexical hypothesis
2.8.2 Lexical approach to personality studies
2.8.3 Lexical approach to values dimensions in six cultures
2.9 Critical evaluation
2.9.1 Statement of problems in previous Chinese values studies
2.9.2 Research hypotheses and questions
2.10 Chapter summary
Chapter Three: Research Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Study One: Development of Lexically-based Chinese Values Inventory （LCVI）
3.2.1 Dictionary of Modern Chinese as source of values items
3.2.2 Extraction procedures of value descriptors
3.2.2.1 Stage One: Establishing a preliminary list of values descriptors by direct extraction
3.2.2.2 Stage Two: Establishing a preliminary list of values descriptors by indirect extraction
3.2.2.3 Stage Three: Comparing direct extraction with indirect extraction
3.2.2.4 Stage Four: Open-ended survey elicitation
3.2.2.5 Stage Five: Further reduction by elimination of synonyms and blending of synonyms
3.2.2.6 Stage Six: Rating the list
3.2.3 The pilot study
3.2.3.1 Research purpose
3.2.3.2 Participants
3.2.3.3 Procedure
3.2.3.4 Revision of the LCVI
3.2.4 Comparison with other questionnaires
3.3 Study Two: Structuring the domain of Chinese values
3.3.1 Research questions
3.3.2 Participants
3.3.3 Instruments
3.3.4 Data collection
3.3.5 Data analysis
3.3.6 Results
3.3.6.1 Descriptive statistics
3.3.6.2 Five factors of Chinese values
3.3.6.3 Replication of the factorial structure
3.3.6.4 Sub-dimensions of the five factors
3.3.6.5 Construction of the Lexically-based Chinese Values Survey （LCVS）
3.3.6.6 Correlation between scales and/or sub-scales
3.3.6.7 Gender differences for five factors and ten sub-factors
3.4 Study Three: Confirmatory factor analysis
3.4.1 Participants
3.4.2 Model construction for the LCVS
3.4.3 Goodness of fit of the Model
3.4.4 Path model for each factor
3.5 Study Four: Relating to SVS value domains
3.5.1 Smallest Space Analysis of the SVS items
3.5.2 Smallest Space Analysis of LCVS items
3.5.3 Correlations of LCVS scales and SVS value domains
3.5.4 Relations between the LCVS and the SVS
3.5.4.1 Partial correlations of the LCVS with the SVS value domains
3.5.4.2 Correlations of the LCVS with the SVS value domains
3.6 Chapter summary
Chapter Four: Summary of Results and General Discussion
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Summary of results
4.3 General discussion
4.3.1 Establishment of the Lexically-based Chinese Values Inventory
4.3.2 Emergence of a five-factor and 10 sub-factors model of Chinese values
4.3.3 Comparison with Schwartz’s values theory
4.4 Chapter summary
Chapter Five: Conclusion
5.1 Major contributions
5.2 Implications
5.3 Research limitations
5.4 Suggestions for future research
5.5 Chapter summary
References
Appendices
Appendix 1: Evolution of the SVS from the RVS and the CVS
Appendix 2: Open-ended survey question and results
Appendix 3: The Chinese Values Inventory （LCVI）
Appendix 4: SVS codings for the SSA
Appendix 5: Match of the LCVI with CVS （CCC, 1987） and NCVS （Kulich, 1997; 1998）
Appendix 6: Factor loadings of 315 value items in the PCA
Appendix 7: LCVS and coding
Appendix 8: SSA analysis of SVS items
Appendix 9: SSA analysis of LCVS items
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]对外传播中的共享性中华核心价值观[J]. 关世杰. 人民论坛·学术前沿. 2012(15)
[2]价值观取向理论结构及实证[J]. 王晓钧,张文慧,王海平. 应用心理学. 2012(01)
[3]基于动机的人类基础价值观理论研究——Schwartz价值观理论和研究述评[J]. 张敏,邓希文. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版). 2012(01)
[4]问卷调查法在跨文化交际研究中的应用创新[J]. 李加军. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版). 2011(02)
[5]当代中国人价值观的结构与特点[J]. 金盛华,郑建君,辛志勇. 心理学报. 2009(10)
[6]大学生传统人际价值观的探索性与验证性研究[J]. 张苹平,张进辅. 心理学探新. 2009(03)
[7]中国青年人生价值观初探[J]. 徐华春,郑涌,黄希庭. 西南大学学报(社会科学版). 2008(05)
[8]中学生价值观问卷的编制及其结构验证[J]. 金盛华,孙雪飞,郑建君. 应用心理学. 2008(02)
[9]中外价值观研究述评[J]. 唐文清,张进辅. 心理科学. 2008(03)
[10]今日的跨文化交际研究向何处去?[J]. 顾嘉祖. 中国外语. 2008(01)
本文编号：3055586
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/3055586.html
