英美文化中非对等权势关系间冲突话语的语用分析

发布时间：2021-04-03 00:29

　　冲突性话语是日常交际中一种普遍而又复杂的言语行为。非对等权势主体之间的冲突话语是冲突性话语的一个重要构成。其对社会成员之间交流的影响是显而易见的。国内外对冲突性话语的研究,已初具规模,并形成了丰富的研究成果。然而,对于非对等权势关系间的冲突性话语的研究,还为数不多。有鉴于此,本文试图从语用学的多维视角出发,对英美文化中具有非对等权势关系的人物间的冲突性话语进行剖析。本文采用的研究方法是基于语料分析的定性研究。本文选取英美影视剧作中具有非对等权势关系的人物之间的对白,作为基本的语料来源。本文的理论框架是Jef Verschueren （2000）的顺应论和马斯洛的需求层次学说。顺应论阐释了言语行为发生的过程,以及言语使用过程中的三个特征,进而指出言语使用过程中,对语境因素的动态顺应,是交际双方实现言语行为目的的必要条件。此外,针对顺应论未能对言语交际行为加以深入解析的问题,在语用学的多维视角下,将马斯洛的需求层次学说引入到语用学的分析中,交际主体对彼此需求的顺应亦是实现言语交流的目的的必备要素,丰富了言语产生机制的内涵。以此为理论框架,经过分析论证,本文揭示了英美文化中具有非对等权势关系... 

【文章来源】：山西财经大学山西省

【文章页数】：68 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the present study
    1.2 Problems with the existing studies
    1.3 Research methodology
    1.4 Outline of the thesis
Chapter Two Review of the relevant literature
    2.1.P ower and unequal power
        2.1.1 Definition of power
        2.1.2 Classification of power
        2.1.3 Scenarios of unequal power
    2.2 Power-based conflict
        2.2.1 Definition of conflict
        2.2.2 Previous studies of power-based conflict talks
            2.2.2.1 Linguistics-based study on conflict talks
            2.2.2.2 Sociology-based study on conflict talks
            2.2.2.3 Studies on conflict talks between unequal powers
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical framework
    3.1 Jef Verschueren's Linguistic Adaptation Theory
        3.1.1 Process of using language
        3.1.2 Three key properties of language use
            3.1.2.1 Variability
            3.1.2.2 Negotiability
            3.1.2.3 Adaptability
        3.1.3 Four angles of adaptability
            3.1.3.1 Contextual correlates of adaptability
            3.1.3.2 Structural objects of adaptation
            3.1.3.3 Dynamics of adaptation
            3.1.3.4 Salience of the adaptation process
    3.2 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
        3.2.1 Relation between Adaptation Theory and Hierarchy of Needs
        3.2.2 Elaboration of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
            3.2.2.1 Introduction
            3.2.2.2 Physiological needs
            3.2.2.3 Safety needs
            3.2.2.4 Love and belonging needs
            3.2.2.5 Esteem needs
            3.2.2.6 Self-actualization needs
        3.2.3 A summary of this theory
    3.3 Mechanism leading to conflict talks
    3.4 Summary
Chapter Four Analysis of conflict talks between unequal powers
    4.1 Failure to make adaptation to physical world between unequal powers
        4.1.1 Failure to make adaptation to time
        4.1.2 Failure to make adaptation to space
        4.1.3 Failure to make adaptation to nonverbal factors
    4.2 Failure to make adaptation to social world between unequal powers
        4.2.1 Failure to make adaptation to communicative norms
        4.2.2 Failure to make adaptation to religious beliefs
        4.2.3 Failure to make adaptation to values
        4.2.4 Failure to make adaptation to gender
    4.3 Failure to make adaptation to mental world between unequal powers
        4.3.1 Failure to make adaptation to motivations
        4.3.2 Failure to make adaptation to wishes
    4.4 Failure to make adaptation to needs of unequal powers
        4.4.1 Failure to make adaptation to physiological needs
        4.4.2 Failure to make adaptation to safety needs
        4.4.3 Failure to make adaptation to love and belonging needs
        4.4.4 Failure to make adaptation to esteem needs
        4.4.5 Failure to make adaptation to self-actualization needs
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Orientations and results of conflict talks
    5.1 Orientations of conflict talks
        5.1.1 Convergence orientation
        5.1.2 Divergence orientation
    5.2 Results of conflict talks between unequal powers
        5.2.1 Mitigation of conflict talks between unequal powers
        5.2.2 Termination of conflict talks between unequal powers
    5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Summary of the findings
    6.3 Limitations of this study
    6.4 Suggestions for further research
References
Acknowledgements
攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文



本文编号：3116250