英汉作格动词的句法与语义研究

发布时间：2021-07-23 11:29

　　作格动词是指既可做及物又可做不及物使用的动词。在作格语言中,及物形式的宾语和不及物形式的主语具有相同的格标记。一些语言学家将作格动词与Perlmutter （1978）提出的非宾格假设中的非宾格动词视为一物。然而,作为非宾格动词的一个子集,作格动词特指那些有及物和不及物两种形式并能参与使役转换的动词。本文将从句法—语义界面角度出发研究这类派生的非宾格动词。自1978年Perlmutter在关系语法框架下提出非宾格假设,作格这种语法现象就引起了西方语言学家的密切关注。与国外语言学界长期的研究相比,国内语言学界对作格动词的研究起步相对较晚,且研究缺乏系统性。此外,关于英汉作格动词对比研究的成果较少。鉴于这种情况,本文试图收集相对完整的双语语料,进行英汉作格动词的对比分析,旨在揭示英汉双语中作格动词的句法及语义共性和特性。本文对英汉作格动词的句法分析始于对作格动词及物性的讨论。以往的结论偏向于认为作格不及物动词为基本形式,使役格动词从前者派生而来。然而,本文基于前人研究成果和数据收集,对这两种结构的派生机制进行了句法分析,结果表明作格不及物动词是由使役格动词通过名词组移位派生得到的,其间经历... 

【文章来源】：中南大学湖南省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：155 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter 1 Literature Review
    1.1 Typological Account
    1.2 Transformational-Generative Grammar Account
    1.3 Functional Grammar Account
    1.4 Cognitive Grammar Account
Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework
    2.1 The Unaccusative Hypothesis
    2.2 Burzio's Generalization
    2.3 Uniform Theta-Assignment Hypothesis
    2.4 VP-Shell Analysis
Chapter 3 Syntactic Analysis of English and Chinese Ergative Verbs
    3.1 Ergative Verbs and Unaccusative Verbs
        3.1.1 Broad and Narrow Senses of Ergative Verbs
        3.1.2 Surface Unaccusativity and Deep Unaccusativity
    3.2 Transitivity of Ergative Verbs
        3.2.1 Morphological Derivation
        3.2.2 Derivational Direction of English Ergative Verbs
            3.2.2.1 Intransitivity to Transitivity
            3.2.2.2 Transitivity to Intransitivity
        3.2.3 Derivational Direction of Chinese Ergative Verbs
            3.2.3.1 Syntactic Similarities between English and Chinese
            3.2.3.2 Derivational Direction of Chinese Ergative Pairs
    3.3 Syntactic Analysis of Ergative Alternation
        3.3.1 Syntactic Operation of Ergative Alternation
        3.3.2 Case Assignment of Ergative Intransitives
            3.3.2.1 Case Assignment in English
            3.3.2.2 Case Assignment in Chinese
    3.4 Syntactic Properties of Ergative Verbs
    3.5 Comparison of Ergative Constructions and Other Syntactic Constructions
        3.5.1 Ergative Constructions and Passive Constructions
        3.5.2 Ergative Constructions and Middle Constructions
Chapter 4 Semantic Analysis of English and Chinese Ergative Verbs
    4.1 Semantic-Syntactic Interface
    4.2 Determining Factors of English Ergative Verbs
        4.2.1 Change of State
        4.2.2 Agentivity
        4.2.3 External vs.Internal Causation
        4.2.4 English Verbs of Existence and Appearance
    4.3 Semantic Properties of Chinese Ergative Verbs
        4.3.1 Classification of Chinese Ergative Verbs
        4.3.2 Determining Factors of Chinese Ergative Verbs
        4.3.3 V-R Compounds in Chinese
        4.3.4 Ergative Alternations and Passives
        4.3.5 Verbs of Body Movement
        4.3.6 Adjectives of State
        4.3.7 Chinese Verbs of Existence and Appearance
    4.4 Semantic Derivational Mechanism of Ergative Verbs
        4.4.1 Lexical Derivation
        4.4.2 Post-lexical Derivation
    4.5 Aspectual Properties of Ergative Verbs
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Appendix
Acknowledgements
攻读学位期间主要研究成果


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]英汉作格动词语义、句法及其界面比较[J]. 王文斌,罗思明,刘晓林,于善志.  外语教学与研究. 2009(03)
[2]使役结构若干问题刍议[J]. 李伯约,向建雄.  外国语言文学研究. 2006(03)
[3]有关“施事后置”及“非宾格假说”的几个问题[J]. 吕云生.  语言科学. 2005(05)
[4]显性非宾格动词结构的句法研究[J]. 潘海华,韩景泉.  语言研究. 2005(03)
[5]中动结构的界定[J]. 何文忠.  外语教学. 2005(04)
[6]英语作格句语用功能的词汇语用分析[J]. 牛保义.  外语与外语教学. 2005(06)
[7]作格化和汉语被动句[J]. 邓思颖.  中国语文. 2004(04)
[8]论典型致使结构的英汉表达异同[J]. 熊学亮,梁晓波.  外语教学与研究. 2004(02)
[9]论汉语使役句[J]. 何元建,王玲玲.  汉语学习. 2002(04)
[10]“及物性”特征与相关的四类动词[J]. 徐杰.  语言研究. 2001(03)



本文编号：3299209