英汉研究论文中作者身份之构建对比分析

发布时间：2021-10-30 14:32

　　有研究表明,研究论文（以下简称论文）并不是一种受传统规范制约的与个人情感无关的报道,而是作者通过与读者交流构建身份的学术机制。随着人们对论文交际性的普遍接受,论文中的人际特征成为近二十年来语篇分析的热点。不过,较少有研究对比分析不同语言论文中的人际特征,迄今为止还未发现有研究对比分析英汉论文中的人际特征。本文是一项实证研究,对比分析英汉论文作者如何通过与读者交流,即呈现立场以及使读者介入来构建身份。本研究建立了一个包括70篇语言学及应用语言学基于实验方法或语料的论文的语料库（中英文论文各35篇）。应用Hyland（2005）的学术交流分析模式并结合语类理论对比分析英汉论文中立场和介入语言资源的使用频率以及在论文中的分布特点,并对造成差异的原因进行语用分析。研究结果表明,英汉论文作者都倾向于表达自己的立场而没有积极地使读者介入到语篇中。然而,英汉论文存在明显的差异。首先,英文论文作者把论文看作是与读者之间的交际协议,而中文论文作者把论文看作是对事实的陈述。其次,英文论文对话性较强,而中文论文更像作者的独白。再者,英文论文作者比中文论文作者表现出更强的“推销”意识。第四,英文论文作者更期待... 

【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：257 页

【学位级别】：博士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Acronyms
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 The social view towards research articles
    1.2 Objectives of the study
    1.3 Significance of the study
    1.4 Outline of the dissertation
Chapter Two Key concepts defined
    2.1 The RA genre
        2.1.1 The concept of the RA
        2.1.2 Characteristics of the RA
    2.2 Identity
        2.2.1 The concept of identity
        2.2.2 Discoursal construction of identity
        2.2.3 Writer identity in academic writing
    2.3 The RA genre and authorial identity
Chapter Three Literature review
    3.1 Interaction in academic writing
        3.1.1 Under different terms
        3.1.2 On different aspects
    3.2 Interaction in RA genre
    3.3 Identity construction in academic discourse
        3.3.1 Theoretical research on identity construction in academic writing
        3.3.2 Practical research on identity construction in academic writing
    3.4 Identity construction in RA genre
Chapter Four Theoretical framework
    4.1 Hyland’s model of academic interaction
        4.1.1 Stance and writer-oriented interaction
            4.1.1.1 Hedges
            4.1.1.2 Boosters
            4.1.1.3 Attitude markers
            4.1.1.4 Self-mention
        4.1.2 Engagement and reader-oriented interaction
            4.1.2.1 Reader pronouns
            4.1.2.2 Personal asides
            4.1.2.3 Appeals to shared knowledge
            4.1.2.4 Directives
            4.1.2.5 Questions
    4.2 Genre analysis
        4.2.1 Traditions of genre analysis theories
        4.2.2 Genre analysis of RAs
    4.3 The framework used in this study
        4.3.1 Motivations for the present framework
        4.3.2 The framework for analysing interactional features in RAs
Chapter Five Research design
    5.1 Data selection and corpus building
        5.1.1 Data selection
        5.1.2 Corpus building
    5.2 Data analysis
        5.2.1 Annotation
        5.2.2 Method of analysis
Chapter Six Frequency of stance and engagement markers in English and Chinese RAs
    6.1 Frequency of stance markers in English and Chinese RAs
        6.1.1 Hedges in English and Chinese RAs
            6.1.1.1 Identification of hedges
            6.1.1.2 Frequency of hedges
        6.1.2 Boosters in English and Chinese RAs
            6.1.2.1 Identification of boosters
            6.1.2.2 Frequency of boosters
        6.1.3 Attitude markers in English and Chinese RAs
            6.1.3.1 Identification of attitude markers
            6.1.3.2 Frequency of attitude markers
        6.1.4 Self-mention in English and Chinese RAs
            6.1.4.1 Identification of self-mention
            6.1.4.2 Frequency of self-mention
        6.1.5 Summary of stance markers used in RAs
    6.2 Frequency of engagement markers in English and Chinese RAs
        6.2.1 Reader pronouns in English and Chinese RAs
            6.2.1.1 Identification of reader pronouns
            6.2.1.2 Frequency of reader pronouns
        6.2.2 Personal asides in English and Chinese RAs
            6.2.2.1 Identification of personal asides
            6.2.2.2 Frequency of personal asides
        6.2.3 Appeals to shared knowledge in English and Chinese RAs
            6.2.3.1 Identification of appeals to shared knowledge
            6.2.3.2 Frequency of appeals to shared knowledge
        6.2.4 Directives in English and Chinese RAs
            6.2.4.1 Identification of directives
            6.2.4.2 Frequency of directives
        6.2.5 Questions in English and Chinese RAs
            6.2.5.1 Identification of questions
            6.2.5.2 Frequency of questions
        6.2.6 Summary of engagement markers used in RAs
Chapter Seven Distribution of stance and engagement markers across generic structure in English and Chinese RAs
    7.1 Distribution of stance markers across generic structure in English and Chinese RAs
        7.1.1 Hedges across generic structure
        7.1.2 Boosters across generic structure
        7.1.3 Attitude markers across generic structure
        7.1.4 Self-mention across generic structure
        7.1.5 Summary of stance markers across generic structure in English and Chinese RAs
    7.2 Distribution of engagement markers across generic structure in English and Chinese RAs
        7.2.1 Reader pronouns across generic structure
        7.2.2 Personal asides across generic structure
        7.2.3 Appeals to shared knowledge across generic structure in RAs
        7.2.4 Directives across generic structure
        7.2.5 Questions across generic structure
        7.2.6 Summary of engagement markers in English and Chinese RAs
Chapter Eight Pragmatic analysis of authorial identity construction
    8.1 Manifestations of RA writers’social identity
    8.2 Metapragmatic awareness in authorial identity construction
    8.3 Social and psychological features of English and Chinese RAs
        8.3.1 Reconciliation between ethical canons and cognitive constructs
        8.3.2 Beliefs about utterance production and interpretation
        8.3.3 Perceptions of face
        8.3.4 Implementation of academic norms
Chapter Nine Conclusion
    9.1 Summary of major findings
    9.2 Implications of the current research
        9.2.1 Implications for RA writing
        9.2.2 Implications for the teaching of academic writing
    9.3 Limitations of the research
    9.4 Recommendations for future research
Bibliography
Appendices
    Appendix 1 English and Chinese RAs used as data of this study
    Appendix 2 Excerpts of English and Chinese RAs


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]第一人称代词的话语功能:基于中外科学家材料科学论文引言的对比研究[J]. 黄大网,钟圆成,张月红.  中国科技期刊研究. 2008(05)
[2]微型学术讲座中元话语的关联阐释[J]. 胡春华.  西安外国语大学学报. 2007(04)
[3]语言与身份构建:相关文献回顾[J]. 谷小娟,李艺.  外语学刊. 2007(06)
[4]英语研究论文的及物性结构与论文交际目标的实现[J]. 庞继贤,陈明瑶.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(05)
[5]英语学术语篇中的评论附加语[J]. 杨信彰.  外语与外语教学. 2006(10)
[6]学术论著人际意义及表达手段的跨文化差异[J]. 陈曦.  西安外国语学院学报. 2006(02)
[7]英语学术书评的评价策略——从对话视角的介入分析[J]. 唐丽萍.  外语学刊. 2005(04)
[8]学术论文摘要的体裁分析[J]. 葛冬梅,杨瑞英.  现代外语. 2005(02)
[9]英语学术论文摘要中的模糊限制语[J]. 曾瑜薇,胡芳.  山东外语教学. 2005(02)
[10]学术书评语类结构的评价分析[J]. 唐丽萍.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2004(03)



本文编号：3466899