意象图式在意义构建过程中的作用

发布时间：2022-05-10 19:25

　　认知语用学认为,意义构建是概念化的过程,受语境影响,也是对言语行为的推理理解过程。所谓言语行为有直接言语行为和间接言语行为之分。大部分直接言语行为不需要意义构建的推理过程。然而,间接言语行为的话语含义无法直接从语言表达式中获取,说话者真正的意图需进行推理和意义构建过程。本论文研究的焦点在于间接言语行为意义获取的认知机制,即,通过转喻思维推理获取含义,提出转喻的认知基础是意象图示,并将后者分为两大类:[1]容器;[2]部分-整体。本文意在心理模型和语用推理模型结合的基础上,诠释间接言语行为的运作机制。总之,本文以认知语用学为指导视角,重点研究意象图式作为认知机制如何通过转喻实现推理,在语境限制下获取含义。具体说来,本文遵循Panther和Thornburg （1997）的转喻观点,即转喻在间接言语行为中的操作也具有指称转喻的部分-整体特点,并指出传统的间接言语行为研究只做到听话者推理说话者意图这一步,即未澄清言语识解的认知推理模式。而转喻一直被视作是自然推理图示,并重新释义为交际中司空见惯的思维和语言现象。（Lakoff&Johnson,1980/2003）鉴上,本文研究焦点落实... 

【文章页数】：99 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Part 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Questions and Hypotheses
        1.1.1 Research questions
        1.1.2 Hypotheses
    1.2 Data
    1.3 Structure of the Dissertation
    1.4 Summary
Part 2 Theoretical Framework and Literature Review
    2.1 Image Schema Theory
        2.1.1 Schemas, images, and image schemas
    2.2 Image Schema and Their Transformations
        2.2.1 Properties and functions of image schema
        2.2.2 Image schema transformation
        2.2.3 Image schema and metaphorical and metonymical mechanisms
    2.3 The Different Views on Meaning
        2.3.1 The philosophical basis of meaning
        2.3.2 The traditional view on meaning
        2.3.3 The cognitive view on meaning
    2.4 Meaning Construction
        2.4.1 Meaning construction in traditional view
        2.4.2 Meaning construction in cognitive view
    2.5 Indirect Speech Act and Metonymy
        2.5.1 Indirect speech
        2.5.2 Brief introduction of metonymy
        2.5.3 Metonymy and indirect speech act
Part 3 Methodology
    3.1 The Objectives of the Paper
    3.2 The Methods Used
Part 4 Results
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 The Case Study
        4.2.1 Container schema and metonymy in indirect speech acts
        4.2.2 Part-whole schema and metonymy in indirect speech acts
    4.3 Summary
Part 5 Discussion
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 The Function of Context in Inference
        5.2.1 Subject contextual factors (SCF)
        5.2.2 Objective contextual factors (OCF)
    5.3 Other Factors and Inference
        5.3.1 Intention
        5.3.2 Culture
    5.4 Summary: Cognitive-Pragmatic Interface
Part 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Findings and Conclusions
    6.3 Limitations of Our Work
Bibliography
Published Paper
Acknowledgements


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]言外转喻的“属性强加联想”模式[J]. 邹春玲.  外语学刊. 2010(02)
[2]歇后语的心理模型分析[J]. 邹春玲,成晓光.  外语研究. 2009(03)
[3]汉语转喻理解的模因分析[J]. 邹春玲.  外语学刊. 2008(06)
[4]转喻矩阵域观[J]. 陈香兰,申屠菁.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2008(02)
[5]基于模型的语用推理[J]. 徐盛桓.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(03)
[6]概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J]. 张辉,孙明智.  外语与外语教学. 2005(03)
[7]言语行为转喻与话语的深层连贯[J]. 李勇忠.  外语教学. 2004(03)
[8]预设投射研究的Karttunen模式与Fauconnier模式[J]. 刘宇红.  外语学刊. 2003(02)
[9]间接言语行为中的借代[J]. 李勇忠.  解放军外国语学院学报. 2003(02)



本文编号：3652552