现代汉语“部分”量词的认知研究

发布时间：2018-02-11 01:27

本文关键词： 现代汉语部分量词认知比较　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：量词是现代汉语中很有特色的一个词类,它分为名量词和动量词。名量词中的部分量词是现代汉语量词体系中一个独立的小类,它不但有独立于其他量词的认知属性,而且有多样的语法表现情况。虽然学者们对部分量词进行过多方面的研究,但是,他们的研究还是不够全面,因此,基于前人的研究,本文以认知语言学的理论为指导,对部分量词进行比较全面地认知研究。本文一共由六个部分组成:绪论部分主要是对学者们研究部分量词的情况进行统计分析,进而在此基础上,对本文研究的意义、思路、方法、对象以及语料来源进行说明。第一章在对部分量词进行梳理的基础上,明确了本文界定部分量词的形式和语义标准以及存在依据。本章以这两类标准为依据,把部分量词分成常规类部分量词、次常规类部分量词以及非常规类部分量词,并最终确定了其内涵、外延。第二章在对量词词典、量词专著以及语法书后面附录中的量词进行梳理分析的基础上,通过从部分量词自身和中心词这两个角度对部分量词的属性进行分析之后,发现部分量词有约定性、客观依赖性等一些认知属性。第三章采用比较分析法、个案法和认知分析法,对“节”和“截”、“分”和“成”等两对相似的部分量词进行比较之后,发现“节”和“截”不仅有一些相同的认知属性,还有一些不同的认知属性。同时,“分”和“成”在背景性、间接性等认知属性上表现出了相同之处,而在顺序性、离散性等认知属性上表现出了不同之处。第四章主要从认知的角度对部分量词和个体量词、集合量词以及相乘类复合量词之间的差异进行了比较分析,并在比较分析的基础上,发现部分量词和其他三类量词分别在参照点、扫描方式、构成模式等方面表现出了不同之处,本章的目的是想说明部分量词在汉语量词系统中的地位是独立的。结语部分对本文的内容进行简要概括,并明确了本文后期需要改进的地方。
[Abstract]:Classifier is a characteristic part of part of speech in modern Chinese, which is divided into nominal classifier and variable classifier. Part of quantifier is an independent subclass in modern Chinese classifier system, which not only has cognitive attributes independent of other classifiers. And there are various grammatical expressions. Although scholars have done too much research on some quantifiers, their studies are not comprehensive enough. Therefore, based on the previous studies, this paper is guided by the theory of cognitive linguistics. This paper is composed of six parts: the introduction part is mainly about the statistical analysis of scholars' research on partial quantifiers, and on this basis, the significance and thinking of this study are discussed. Methods, objects and the source of the corpus. The first chapter defines the form and semantic standard of part quantifier and the basis of its existence on the basis of combing some quantifiers. This chapter is based on these two kinds of standards. Part quantifiers are divided into conventional classifiers, sub-conventional partial classifiers and unconventional partial classifiers, and their connotations and denotations are finally determined. On the basis of combing and analyzing the classifiers in the appendix at the back of the classifier monographs and grammatical books, after analyzing the attributes of some classifiers from the two angles of the quantifier itself and the central word, it is found that some classifiers have the nature of convention. The third chapter uses comparative analysis, case analysis and cognitive analysis to compare two pairs of similar quantifiers, such as "section" and "cut", "divide" and "Cheng". It is found that "knob" and "truncation" have not only some same cognitive attributes, but also some different cognitive attributes. At the same time, the "division" and "Cheng" have the same characteristics in background, indirect and other cognitive attributes, but in the order. In Chapter 4th, the differences between some quantifiers, individual classifiers, aggregate classifiers and multiplicative compound classifiers are compared and analyzed from the perspective of cognition. It is found that some quantifiers and the other three categories of quantifiers are different in terms of reference point, scanning mode, composing mode and so on. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the independent position of partial quantifiers in the Chinese classifier system.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146

【相似文献】