试论语用标记“还说呢”

发布时间：2018-02-22 18:28

本文关键词： 语用标记还说呢埋怨语用特征话语功能　出处：《浙江师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“还说呢”不仅有表示实在言说义的用法,还有一种用法是经常运用在口语交际中用来体现说话人的埋怨性情绪。我们对这种不是由其字面意思简单构成其语义的结构“还说呢”进行分析探讨。第一部分综述了与“还说呢”的相关研究,明确了本论题研究的目的和意义；并简要描述了语用标记的研究概况,为表达埋怨情绪的“还说呢”寻找到了理论支撑。第二部分讨论了共时平面上存在的两个“还说呢”：实义性的“还说呢1”和语用标记“还说呢2”。“还说呢1”表示具体的言说,是在某一动作行为基础上增加或补充一个言说行为,是一种客观描述；“还说呢2”是一个表示埋怨情绪的语用标记。第三部分对语用标记“还说呢”进行了语用特征上的分析。“还说呢”主要出现在引发—应答的语言环境中；明确了两种陈述式的引发语和两种询问式的引发语会触及说话人使用“还说呢”来表达自己的埋怨情绪；总结了应答语“还说呢”三种使用模式,并通过对模式的分析发现“还说呢”可以处在话轮开端,也可以位于话轮中间,还可以出现在话轮结束的位置；分析了语用标记“还说呢”引发埋怨情绪指向的对象可以是引发人,也可以针对引发语中谈及对象或事件。第四部分探讨了语用标记“还说呢”具有的话语功能。语篇功能方面,“还说呢”可以谋篇布局,组织语篇,具体表现为可以用来维持话题、转换话题,进行话题关联；“还说呢”还具有语境顺应的功能。分析了反预期功能对于其人际功能的影响,发现“还说呢”可以表达不满、指责、训斥等埋怨情绪。第五部分简要梳理了“还说呢”演变成语用标记的过程,在这个演变过程中语用强调是其形成动因；在反问语境中吸收否定义,经过语用推理和省略、重复的机制,“还说呢”表埋怨情绪的隐含义规约下来,成为一个语用标记。第六部分将语用标记“还说呢”与相关格式“还说”、“别提了”进行了比较,明确了“还说呢”和“还说”是两个不同的格式；将“还说呢”和“别提了”的用法做了明显的区分,为人们掌握它们的用法提供了参考。
[Abstract]:"Still say" not only said it speech meaning usage, another use is often used in oral communication to reflect the speaker's emotions. We complain of this not by its literal meaning simply constitute the semantic structure of "still say" is discussed. The first part summarizes the related research and "still say", made clear the purpose and significance of this topic; and briefly describes the research situation of pragmatic markers, to express the emotional complain "still say" to find theoretical support. The second part discusses the existence of synchronic two "also said:" the true meaning of "still say 1" and "pragmatic markers still say 2." "it said 1" specific speech is based on a certain action to increase or supplement a speech act, is an objective description; "it said 2" is a representation of Pragmatic markers complain emotion. The third part analyzes the pragmatic features of pragmatic markers, "it said." "still say" mainly in the lead response language environment; clear the trigger two statements and two kinds of inquiry the trigger will touch the speaker said "" to express their emotional complain summed up the response; "it said" three kinds of mode, and through the analysis on the mode of "say" can in turn start, can also be located in the center of the turn, can also appear in the turn end position of the object of pragmatic markers "; still say" emotionfocused trigger can be caused by people complain, or to cause about objects or events in the language. The fourth part discusses the pragmatic markedness "still say" with the discourse function. The textual function, "said." In the entire layout, organization of discourse, the specific performance can be used to maintain the topic, change the subject, topic relevance; "still say" also has the function of contextual adaptation. Analysis of the impact of the expected function for anti interpersonal function, "said" can express their dissatisfaction, blame, rebuke such emotional complain. The fifth part briefly reviews the evolution of "still say" idiom in the tagging process, in this process that is the cause of formation of Pragmatic Rhetorical Question in the context of absorption; the negative meaning, through pragmatic inference and ellipsis, repeated mechanism, "it said" implicature statute emotional complain down, become a pragmatic markers. The sixth part will be pragmatic markers "still say" and "also said," related to the format of "nothing" are compared, the "still say" and "said" are two different formats; "still say" and The use of "do not mention" has made a clear distinction, which provides a reference for people to master their usage.

【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H136

【相似文献】