章太炎政治学术的互文及其对场域规训的体认——基于章太炎对出土文献态度的考察

发布时间：2018-03-05 22:03

本文选题：章太炎　切入点：出土文献　出处：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通常以为,国学大师章太炎的学术保守与政治激进似构成一对矛盾体。就前者而言,最典型的表现便是抵制其时新发现的出土文献。然而关于章氏对甲骨的态度,"一贯否定"说和"始疑终信"说均有待商榷。晚年章氏实已承认了部分甲骨的真实性(对释读仍表怀疑)。此外也肯定了大部分钟鼎彝器以及宋以前的考释(对宋以后的释读仍持怀疑),而对《陈仓石鼓》、《三体石经》的文字学意义则更是予以了高度肯定,甚至将《三体石经》提高到了与《说文解字》同等的地位。由章氏关于出土文献态度的考察,不但显示出其学术上并非简单"保守",也揭示出其对学术场域内在运行逻辑的尊重。章氏在学术场域中的严谨与政治场域中的激进均基于其对不同场域内在规训的深刻体认,看似矛盾,实则互文见义,内蕴了深层次的高度一致性。
[Abstract]:It is generally believed that the academic conservatism and political radicalization of Zhang Taiyan, the master of Chinese culture, constitute a pair of contradictions. The most typical manifestation is to resist the newly discovered documents. However, regarding Zhang's attitude to oracle bones, both the "consistent negation" theory and the "initial doubt and final belief" theory are open to question. In his later years, Zhang Shih has admitted the truth of some of the oracle bones. In addition, most of the Yi wares of Chung Ding and the textual research before the Song Dynasty (still doubtful about the interpretation after the Song Dynasty), and the philological significance of "Chen Cang Shi Du" and "San body Shi Jing" were highly affirmed. He even raised the Triple Stone Sutra to the same position as Shuowen Jie Zi. According to Zhang's attitude toward unearthed literature, It not only shows that it is not simply "conservative" academically, but also reveals its respect for the operational logic in the academic field. Zhang's preciseness in the academic field and the radicalization in the political field are all based on his profound understanding of the internal discipline of different fields. Seemingly contradictory, in fact, intertextuality, contains a deep level of high consistency.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学;华东师范大学国家话语生态研究中心;华东师范大学对外汉语学院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学十二五规划青年课题“东汉至晚清传统互文理论研究”(2014EYY001) 上海市“晨光计划”项目“西方互文性理论与汉语文本理论中“互文”范畴的关联与比较”(16CG26) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
【分类号】：B259.2;H121

【相似文献】