跨文化视角下中美贸易摩擦官方报道的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 07:31

本文选题：跨文化　切入点：文化差异　出处：《天津商业大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：有关国家之间贸易摩擦的官方新闻报道对于研究相关国家的文化差异从而帮助找出减少或解决两国贸易摩擦的办法就是很有价值的。本文以霍夫斯塔德的文化价值维度理论及霍尔的高低文化语境作为理论基础,对中美两国2013年至2016年间关于贸易摩擦的40篇官方报道进行研究,其中,20篇中国报道选自中国商务部官方新闻网站,20篇美国报道选自美国贸易代表办公室官方网站。通过分析对比两国报道在语言使用上的差异,探索两国文化在价值维度及高低文化语境方面的差异,并进一步将研究所得数据与传统跨文化价值指数进行对比。文章由六个章节组成。第一章为本研究的简要介绍;第二张为文献综述及研究问题;第三章介绍了本篇研究的理论框架;第四章介绍了研究数据来源及研究方法;第五章对中美两国报道的语言使用差异及其所反映的文化特点进行了详细对比;第六章详述了研究的结果总结。本研究发现,两国关于贸易摩擦的官方报道在语言使用上具有明显差异,主要体现了其在文化方面的差异包括:个人主义与集体主义;不确定性规避;权力距离;长期时间取向与短期时间取向;高语境与低语境文化。值得注意的是,在权力距离方面,从一些具体词汇(如工人,家庭)的使用来看,美国属于低权力距离文化,这与传统的文化维度理论也相符。然而在美国的官方贸易摩擦报道中,高权力距离的相关词汇使用频率却高于低权力距离的相关词汇,这与传统跨文化理论中的指数有所差别——这正是贸易摩擦官方新闻报道的特别之处。本文不仅揭示了中美官方贸易摩擦报道在语言使用上差异及其所反映出的文化差异,也提出了跨文化研究方面一个新的视角,即对比现有研究结果所得出的数据以及文化价值体现与前人的文化价值理论中的维度指数是否一致,如果不一致,进一步发现是哪些差异。
[Abstract]:The trade friction between the countries concerned official news reports of cultural differences to study the relevant countries to help find out how to reduce or solve trade friction between the two countries is of great value. Based on the cultural dimension theory and Holzer Hofstede's level of cultural context as the theoretical basis, which of the two countries from 2013 to 2016 were research. On the 40 official report of the trade friction, the 20 Chinese reports from the Ministry of Commerce China official news website 20 reported in the United States from the United States Trade Representative Office official website. Through the analysis of the two countries reported differences in language use, to explore the differences in the value dimension and the level of cultural context and culture of the two countries will further study the data obtained with the traditional cultural value index were compared. The article consists of six chapters. The first chapter is the Research Brief The second is the problem; literature review and research; the third chapter introduces the theoretical framework of this study; the fourth chapter introduces the research data sources and research methods; the cultural characteristics of China and the United States reported the use of language and reflects the difference of the fifth chapter gives a detailed comparison; the sixth chapter expatiates on the research results of the summary. The study found that the two official reports about trade frictions have obvious differences in language use, mainly reflected in the cultural differences include: individualism and collectivism; uncertainty avoidance; power distance; long time orientation and short time orientation; high context and low context culture. It is worth noting that in power the distance, from some specific terms (such as workers, family use), the United States belongs to the low power distance culture, which is also consistent with the traditional theory of cultural dimensions. However, in the United States The official reports of trade friction, high - power distance is higher than the frequency of use of low power distance, - this is the special trade friction official news reports are different from the traditional theory of cross culture index. This paper not only reveals the Sino US trade friction official reported in the use of language differences and cultural differences reflected, also put forward a new perspective of cross-cultural research, the comparison of existing research results and the data dimension index reflects the value of cultural and cultural value in the previous theory is consistent, if not consistent, which is further found that the difference.

【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136;H313

【参考文献】