“亘”与“亘先”——上博楚竹书《亘先》的关键概念研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 04:19

本文选题：楚竹书　切入点：亘　出处：《新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：文本指出:第一,同意《亘先》第12号简那两个被李零读作"恒"的字应当隶作"亟止"和"亟心",并读作"极"。至于第1-9号简那六个被裘锡圭读作"极"的"亘"字,文本认为应当读作"恒"。由此,这篇竹书可直接称名为《恒先》;第二,"恒"概念包含"恒先"在内,后一概念是从前一概念分化出来的。学者多将这两个概念等同起来,甚至以"恒先"为此一概念的优先表达形式,这是不正确的;第三,竹书的"恒"有别于老子的"道"。在《恒先》中,"恒"只是表示宇宙生化的初始阶段,而"恒先"则推至其极,表示宇宙的端初,跟《淮南子》的"太始"约略相当;第四,"恒"与"天道"在竹书中对应的宇宙生成论的阶段不同。"恒"居于初始阶段,即虚无阶段;而"天道"则居于形下界,是用来描述天地万物生成变化之客观法则的概念;第五,在《恒先》中,"恒"是一个特定的概念,它与"极"并非互为表里的关系。"恒"为恒常义,包含着质朴、静止和虚无的特性,它仅表示宇宙生化的初始阶段;而"极"训"准则",是以"天道"为其内涵的。
[Abstract]:The text points out: first, it is agreed that the two words of Jane No. 12, which were read as "Heng" by Li Chi, should be read as "eager" and "eager heart" and read "extremely". As for the six words of Jane No. 1-9, which Qiu Xigui read as the "span" of "pole", The text holds that it should be read as "Heng". Thus, the bamboo book can be called "Heng first" directly; second, the concept of "Heng" includes "Heng first", the latter one being separated from the former one. Many scholars equate these two concepts. This is not true even in the preferred form of expression of the concept of "Heng first". Third, the bamboo book "Heng" is different from Laozi's "Tao". In "Hengxian", "Heng" is only the initial stage of cosmic biochemistry. "Heng first" is pushed to its pole, indicating that the beginning of the universe is about the same as the "Taishi" of Huainan Zi. Fourth, the stage of "Heng" and "Tian Dao" in the corresponding universe generation theory in bamboo books is different. "Heng" is at the initial stage. That is, the stage of nothingness; the "Tao of heaven", on the other hand, resides in the lower bound of the form, which is the concept used to describe the objective law of the generation and change of everything in heaven and earth; and fifthly, in "constant first", "constant" is a particular concept. The relationship between "pole" and "pole" is not a mutual innermost relationship. "Heng" is constant Chang Yi, which contains the characteristics of simplicity, stillness and nothingness, and it represents only the initial stage of cosmic biochemistry, while the "pole" training criterion takes the "heavenly Tao" as its connotation.
【作者单位】：清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“出土简帛四古本《老子》综合研究”(15ZDB006)的成果武汉大学自主科研项目“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”的资助
【分类号】：H121;K877.5

【相似文献】