批评话语分析再思考——基于辩证唯物主义的语言与社会关系研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 19:56

本文选题：语言与社会 + 批评话语分析　；参考：《当代语言学》2017年04期

【摘要】：考察马克思主义哲学和批评话语分析关于语言与社会关系的认识,可以发现二者的观点侧重不尽相同。然而,批评话语分析不仅在西方马克思主义性质的法兰克福学派寻根,还在经典马克思主义那里问祖,将马克思也说成是批评话语分析者。对批评话语分析的这些论点进行思考,我们认为,如果说批评话语分析与经典马克思主义有所联系,那便是辩证唯物主义为批评话语分析理论的进一步发展提供了前提和基础。在此基础上,我们提出批评话语分析回归马克思,坚持辩证唯物主义物质第一、意识第二,以及认识的基础是实践的观点,认为这样可以使批评话语分析对话语建构作用的强调不走入极端,不脱离社会实在对于话语建构的基础和决定作用这一根基,同时可以使批评话语分析在实现理论发展的过程中更加注重来自现实世界的挑战和机遇。
[Abstract]:After examining the understanding of Marxist philosophy and critical discourse analysis on language and social relations, we can find that their views are different.However, critical discourse analysis not only seeks the roots of the Frankfurt school of western Marxism, but also asks the ancestors of classical Marxism. Marx is also described as a critical discourse analyst.Considering these arguments of critical discourse analysis, we believe that if critical discourse analysis is related to classical Marxism, it is dialectical materialism that provides the premise and foundation for the further development of critical discourse analysis theory.On this basis, we propose that critical discourse analysis return to Marx, adhere to the dialectical materialist material first, consciousness second, and the basis of understanding is the viewpoint of practice.It is believed that the emphasis of critical discourse analysis on the role of discourse construction will not go to the extreme, nor will it break away from the foundation and decisive role of social reality in discourse construction.At the same time, it can make critical discourse analysis pay more attention to the challenges and opportunities from the real world in the process of theoretical development.
【作者单位】：天津外国语大学语言符号应用传播研究中心;天津商业大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目《中国学术话语体系的构建及其与国际学术话语交流策略研究》(项目编号:14BYY070)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：H0-05

【相似文献】