当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言艺术论文 >

类型学视野下广西壮语方言和汉语方言分类词接触研究

发布时间:2018-04-23 18:48

  本文选题:类型学 + 壮语方言 ; 参考:《广西大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文以四个壮语方言点(东兰、贵港、田阳、崇左)和六个汉语方言点(隆安、扶绥、南宁、桂平、博白、贺州)的分类词为研究对象,以Aikhenvald(2000)对分类词的研究理论为框架,从类型学的角度描写广西壮语方言和汉语方言分类词的语义和句法功能,通过对比的方法分析壮语方言和汉语方言分类词在类型学特点上的异同,最后从接触的角度,探讨广西区内壮语方言和汉语方言分类词的语义和句法功能由于接触产生的相互变异现象。全文分为四章,第二第三章是本文的主体。第一章绪论。介绍了与本文有关的分类词理论知识、壮语和汉语方言分类词的研究现状、课题的研究意义、研究方法、创新点、本文的研究框架、语料来源、术语界定等问题。第二章广西壮语方言和汉语方言分类词的语义系统。这一章分为四小节,一、二节分别描写归纳壮语方言和汉语方言分类词的语义系统,总结其类型学特点。第三节对比分析壮语方言和汉语方言分类词语义系统的类型学差异。第四节从接触的视角,分析壮语方言和汉语方言由于接触,语义系统上带来的相互变异现象。第三章广西壮语方言和汉语方言分类词的句法功能。这一章分为四小节,一、二节列举描写壮语和汉语各方言点分类词的句法功能。第三节对比分析壮语方言和汉语方言分类词在句法功能上类型学特点的差异。第四节从接触的视角,论证壮语方言和汉语方言由于接触,句法功能上带来的相互变异现象。第四章结语。总结壮语方言和汉语方言分类词在语义和句法功能上的类型学特点,以及由于接触所带来的相互变异现象。本文初步得出的结论有:语义上,汉语方言对人区分“性别”、“年龄”、“厌恶”等语义;动物视为“有生”;一维无生物的“分叉”语义,都是汉语方言与壮语接触带来的变异现象。而壮语方言分类词语义方面的变异现象是汉语方言分类词的借入,如“个、点”,丰富了壮语方言分类词的语义系统。句法功能上,壮语分类词的句法功能受汉语方言影响较大,如:“分类词+名词”表定指、分类词重叠表全量、“数词+分类词+名词”语序的来源。相反,汉语方言受壮语影响而产生的变异现象较弱,目前发现的是平话的前缀化现象是跟壮语接触所致。
[Abstract]:This paper takes four Zhuang dialect points (Donglan, Guigang, Tianyang, Chongleft) and six Chinese dialect points (long'an, Fusui, Nanning, Guiping, Bobai and Hezhou) as the research objects, and takes Aikhenvaldnian 2000 as the framework. This paper describes the semantic and syntactic functions of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier from the perspective of typology, analyzes the similarities and differences between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier in typology by means of contrastive method, and finally from the angle of contact. This paper probes into the variation of semantic and syntactic functions of classifiers of Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect in Guangxi due to contact. The full text is divided into four chapters, the second and third chapter is the main body of this paper. The first chapter is introduction. This paper introduces the theoretical knowledge of classifiers related to this article, the present situation of the research on the classifiers in Zhuang and Chinese dialects, the significance of the research, the research methods, the innovation points, the research framework, the source of the corpus, the definition of terms, and so on. The second chapter is the semantic system of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier. This chapter is divided into four sections. The first and second sections describe the semantic system of classifying Chinese dialects and Chinese dialects, and summarize their typological characteristics. The third section contrasts and analyzes the typology difference between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. In the fourth section, from the perspective of contact, we analyze the phenomenon of semantic variation brought about by the contact between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. The third chapter is the syntactic function of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier. This chapter is divided into four sections. The first and second sections enumerate the syntactic functions of the Zhuang dialect and the Chinese dialects. The third section contrasts and analyzes the differences of syntactic function between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. From the perspective of contact, the fourth section demonstrates the phenomenon of syntactic variation caused by the contact between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. Chapter four: conclusion. This paper summarizes the typological characteristics of Chinese and Zhuang dialects in terms of semantic and syntactic functions, as well as the phenomena of mutual variation brought about by contact. The preliminary conclusions of this paper are as follows: semantically, Chinese dialects distinguish between "gender", "age", "disgust" and so on; animals are regarded as "living"; Both of them are variations brought about by the contact between Chinese dialects and Zhuang languages. However, the variation in the meaning of the Chinese dialect classification words is the borrowing of the Chinese dialect classifiers, such as "Jiao, Duan", which enriches the semantic system of the Zhuang dialect classifiers. In terms of syntactic functions, the syntactic functions of Zhuang classifiers are greatly influenced by Chinese dialects, such as the categorical nouns, the total number of classifiers, and the source of the word order of numerals. On the contrary, the phenomenon of variation in Chinese dialects influenced by Zhuang language is weak. At present, it is found that the phenomenon of prefixed dialect is caused by contact with Zhuang dialect.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H218;H17

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张志达;“皆”类词同义连用举隅[J];古汉语研究;1992年04期

2 李秋菊;;“迷”类词的生成分析[J];现代语文(语言研究版);2010年02期

3 芜崧;也谈“×化”类词[J];九江师专学报;2000年04期

4 王瑾;;类词头“软”小议[J];沙洋师范高等专科学校学报;2006年01期

5 王晓静;;“族”及“族”类词浅析[J];传奇·传记文学选刊(理论研究);2010年07期

6 胡琳;;论汉语数分类词的界定[J];文学界(理论版);2012年11期

7 范云涛;;非典型级类词浅析[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2013年01期

8 肖雨潞;俄语中的类词组合[J];中国俄语教学;1987年04期

9 孙继善;多类词的分布与辨析[J];文科教学;1995年02期

10 王剑雄;英汉──汉英科技分类词库即将建成[J];中国信息导报;1995年11期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 覃世贞;;“死”类词探异,等级制度管窥[A];国家教师科研基金十二五阶段性成果集(华南卷)[C];2012年

2 孙淑娟;;释“杖”——兼论“~杖”“杖~”类词的刑具义及其他[A];江西省语言学会第七次会员代表大会暨2012年学术年会论文集[C];2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 李彩红;类型学视野下广西壮语方言和汉语方言分类词接触研究[D];广西大学;2017年

2 郝晓艳;基于HSK动态作文语料库的情感类词偏误研究[D];山西大学;2015年

3 仝政;面向外国学习者的“苦”类词教学研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年

4 曹瑞玲;留学生习得“必”类词的偏误分析[D];湖南师范大学;2016年

5 李曼钰;基于HSK动态作文语料库的“然”类词偏误研究[D];广西师范大学;2016年

6 徐梅娟;《说文》饮食器具类词研究[D];江西师范大学;2013年

7 李军;湖北仙桃方言封闭类词研究[D];贵州大学;2009年

8 崔一方;口语格式“X+个+P类词”的构式研究[D];山东大学;2014年

9 王菲宇;从语义地图看汉语“和”类词[D];北京大学;2012年

10 夏露;情态范畴下现代汉语保证类词研究[D];上海师范大学;2017年



本文编号:1793165

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/1793165.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6263c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com