“宅”族网络新词语的认知机制研究

发布时间：2018-04-28 13:03

本文选题：概念整合 + 压制　；参考：《湖南科技大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,“宅”族网络新词语日益流行,吸引了学者们的关注。但是,前人对该词族的研究大多停留在语义、语法等层面的静态研究阶段,并没有找出其生成和意义发展变化的内部机制。本研究拟以概念整合理论(Conceptual Blending Theory,以下简称CBT)和压制理论(Coercion Theory,以下简称CT)为理论背景。针对CBT在解释词语语式形成机制方面存在不足以及CT无法充分解释新词语意义生成机制的特点,本文尝试将CBT和CT融合起来以揭示出“宅”族网络新词语的生成机制进而验证了其融合的有效性。本研究中,我们认为“宅”族新词语新创意义的产出和理解并非某种单一认知机制可以解释,而是需要多种认知方式的协调与整合运作。我们以认知语言学中的概念整合理论以及压制理论为理论背景,以百度网,人民日报,新华网,凤凰网以及中国语言生活状况报告等近五年的287个“宅”族新词语为语料,结合定性与定量的研究方法,探讨这一新的语言现象背后的认知运作机制和过程,对“宅”族网络新词语现象作出较为合理的解释。论文主要围绕以下问题进行论述:概念整合理论和压制理论在解释“宅”族新词语的生成机制中二者融合的可行性;不同类型的“宅”族新词语意义的生成过程有哪些不同。研究结果表明:第一,概念整合理论在解释“宅”族词语形成机制方面存在自身的不足之处,即概念整合理论不能解释某些输入空间之间相互冲突的成分为什么能以及如何进入合成空间的,但该问题可以通过压制理论加以解决。而压制理论不能解释“宅”族词语意义构建的整个过程。这是概念整合理论与压制理论在解释“宅”族网络新词语的生成机制中融合的可行性。第二,通过对“宅+X”结构以及“X+宅”结构进行详尽的分析,我们发现,在“宅”族新词语意义的生成过程中,都需要经历概念整合的过程,在这个过程中,还需要压制来化解冲突。对于“宅+X”结构,压制常常发生在整个构式与“宅”之间,而在“X+宅”结构中,压制的发生则与X的词性有关。当X为形容词时,压制通常发生在两个词项之间(X和“宅”)。当X为名词时,压制常常发生在整个构式与两个词项之间。当X为副词时,压制发生在副词与“宅”之间。另外,当X为名词时,整个“名词+宅”结构意义最终的生成与识解还需要隐喻过程的参与。本研究比较全面和系统的讨论了“宅”族网络新词语意义生成的认知机制,进一步验证了CBT与CT融合的有效性和可行性,对认知语言学的发展有一定的意义,也有利于在吸引人们对网络新词语关注的同时,对其产生认知的影响。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the online neologisms of "house" have become more and more popular and attracted the attention of scholars. However, most of the previous researches on the word family remain at the static stage of semantic and grammatical studies, and fail to find out the internal mechanism of its generation and meaning development and change. This study is based on Conceptual Blending Theory (CBT) and suppression Theory (CTT). In view of the deficiency of CBT in explaining the formation mechanism of lexical form and the inability of CT to fully explain the mechanism of neologism, In this paper, we try to combine CBT and CT to reveal the mechanism of the generation of new words in the "house" family network, and then verify the validity of the fusion. In this study, we believe that the output and understanding of the new meaning of the new words in the "house" family is not a single cognitive mechanism to be explained, but requires the coordination and integration of multiple cognitive styles. We take the conceptual integration theory and the suppression theory in cognitive linguistics as the theoretical background, and we use 287new words and expressions of "house" family in Baidu, People's Daily, Xinhuanet, Phoenix New Media and the State of Chinese language Life report in the past five years as the corpus. Combined with qualitative and quantitative research methods, this paper probes into the cognitive operation mechanism and process behind this new linguistic phenomenon, and makes a more reasonable explanation for the phenomenon of "curtilage" network neologisms. This paper mainly discusses the following questions: the feasibility of the integration of the concept theory and the suppression theory in explaining the formation mechanism of the "house" family neologisms, and the differences in the generation process of the meaning of the new words in different types of "house" families. The results show that: first, the theory of conceptual integration has its own shortcomings in explaining the formation mechanism of "curtilage" family words. That is, conceptual integration theory can not explain why and how some conflicting components of input space can enter composite space, but this problem can be solved by suppression theory. The theory of suppression can not explain the whole process of the meaning construction of the word "house". This is the feasibility of the combination of conceptual integration theory and suppression theory in explaining the generation mechanism of the neologisms of "house" family network. Secondly, through the detailed analysis of the "house X" structure and the "X house" structure, we find that the process of conceptual integration is needed in the process of the generation of the meaning of the new words of the "house" family. Repression is also needed to resolve conflicts. For the "house X" structure, suppression often occurs between the whole construction and the "house", while in the "X house" structure, the occurrence of repression is related to the part of speech of X. When X is an adjective, repression usually occurs between terms X and "house". When X is a noun, repression often occurs between the whole construction and two word items. When X is an adverb, suppression occurs between adverbs and "houses". In addition, when X is a noun, the final generation and interpretation of the meaning of the noun house structure require the participation of the metaphorical process. This study comprehensively and systematically discusses the cognitive mechanism of the meaning generation of the new words in the "house" network, and further verifies the validity and feasibility of the fusion of CBT and CT, which is of certain significance to the development of cognitive linguistics. It is also beneficial to attract people to pay attention to the new words on the Internet, at the same time, to have a cognitive impact on them.
【学位授予单位】：湖南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】