《墨子》排比研究
发布时间:2018-04-29 23:21
本文选题:《墨子》 + 排比 ; 参考:《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:《墨子》中排比运用形式多样,内容丰富。本文以《墨子》排比运用为研究点,收集《墨子》中全部排比运用的语料,进行全面细致的分析,系统地梳理《墨子》排比运用的的特点。本文一共分为四个部分。首先是绪论,主要介绍本文研究主题的研究现状,以及对排比辞格的界定。第一章介绍《墨子》的排比类型。按照前人对排比类型的分类,本文将排比分为短语、句子和段落的排比。其中依据短语充当句法成分的作用,将短句排比又细分为充当主语、谓语、宾语和定语的排比。句子排比又可细分为单句排比和复句排比。根据单句谓语的词性特点将单句排比分为动词性谓语句排比、形容词性谓语句排比和名词性谓语句排比。根据主句和从句之间的逻辑关系,将复句排比细分为并列复句排比、因果复句排比、假设复句排比、转折复句排比等。《墨子》中排比辞格运用广泛,其排比辞格往往不会单独运用,而是与其他辞格综合运用,主要是与层递、反复、设问、顶真及对比等辞格的综合运用。所以,第二章从排比与其他辞格综合运用的角度,进一步探讨《墨子》排比运用的特点。第一部分从排比与层递的综合运用,分析《墨子》排比运用重视语言表述的逻辑性特点。第二部分从排比的连用,与顶真辞格的综合运用,分析《墨子》排比运用重视语言表述的连贯性特点。第三部分从排比与设问、反复、对比等辞格的综合运用,分析《墨子》排比运用重视语言表述的突显性特点。第三章比较《墨子》排比和《孟子》排比运用的特点,突出《墨子》排比运用的特点。第三章分为三个部分,第一部分在前人研究的基础上,进一步探析《孟子》的排比特点。第二部分对二者排比运用作具体分析,首先是相同点,二者语言均选取通俗易懂的语言进行说理,与比喻结合使得语言生动有趣。不同点有两方面,《墨子》排比多复句排比和段落排比,说理清晰严密。《孟子》排比则多使用短句,生动活泼。最后,在情感抒发方面,《墨子》排比语言冷静客观,《孟子》则显得情感充沛。
[Abstract]:Mozi in the use of various forms, rich content. This paper takes "Mozi" as the research point, collects all the data of the use of the ranking ratio in the "Mozi", makes a comprehensive and detailed analysis, and systematically combs the characteristics of the use of the "Mozi" ranking ratio. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is the introduction, which mainly introduces the research status of the subject of this paper, and the definition of the comparative rhetoric. The first chapter introduces the ranking type of Mozi. According to the previous classification of scale types, this paper classifies the ratio into phrase, sentence and paragraph. According to the function of phrase as syntactic component, the short sentence ratio is subdivided into the proportion of subject, predicate, object and attribute. Sentence ratio can be subdivided into single sentence ratio and complex sentence ratio. According to the characteristics of single sentence predicate, the simple sentence ratio is divided into verb predicate, adjective predicate and noun predicate. According to the logical relationship between the main sentence and the clause, the ranking ratio of complex sentence is subdivided into parallel complex sentence, causal complex sentence, hypothetical complex sentence, turning complex sentence, etc. < Mozi > is widely used. It is often not used alone, but with other words and cases, mainly with hierarchical, repeated, ask, top truth and comparison of the comprehensive use of words. Therefore, the second chapter further discusses the characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the perspective of comprehensive use of ranking ratio and other figures of speech. The first part analyzes the logical characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the comprehensive application of ratio and stratification. In the second part, the author analyzes the coherence characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the use of the parallelism and the comprehensive use of the top true words. The third part analyzes the salient features of "Mozi" which attaches importance to language expression from the comprehensive application of comparison and question, repetition, contrast and so on. The third chapter compares the characteristics of the comparison between Mozi and Mencius. The third chapter is divided into three parts. The first part analyzes the characteristics of Mencius' ranking on the basis of previous studies. In the second part, the author makes a concrete analysis of the application of the two ranking ratio. Firstly, the two languages choose the common language to reason, and the combination of metaphor and metaphor makes the language lively and interesting. There are two differences: Mozi, multiple sentences and paragraphs, the reasoning is clear and strict, but the < Mencius > ratio uses short sentences and is lively. Finally, in the aspect of emotional expression, Mozi's comparison language is calm and objective, and Mencius is full of emotion.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H141
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张艺娇;;先秦时期的设问辞格及其审美价值[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
2 查德华;;突显观与模因论在城市形象主题口号中的应用[J];浙江万里学院学报;2011年06期
3 刘瑞琴;;设问辞格的修辞特征和艺术魅力[J];时代文学(上半月);2011年02期
4 徐默凡;;语形辞格的象似性研究[J];当代修辞学;2010年01期
5 罗玉敏;罗荷香;;“反复”修辞格的文体语用功能探析[J];江西科技师范学院学报;2009年03期
6 邹莹洁;;层递的语用分析[J];宜宾学院学报;2009年04期
7 尚康康;;顶真修辞的语篇功能分析[J];广东工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年S1期
8 康梅林;李鹏洲;;层递辞格的特点和心理依据探析[J];襄樊学院学报;2007年06期
9 杨树郁;对比辞格中比较思维的体现形态[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年05期
10 孔漫春;试析墨子比喻的类型及作用[J];平顶山师专学报;2002年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 艾红娟;墨家的语言学思想[D];曲阜师范大学;2002年
,本文编号:1822032
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/1822032.html