微信在线会话下的恭维应答语研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 00:41

  本文选题：恭维 + 恭维应答策略　； 参考：《兰州理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：20世纪80年代以来,国内外语言学者Manes,Pomerantz,Golato,李俊儒,冯江鸿等对恭维语及恭维应答语的研究做出了巨大的贡献。其中,对恭维应答语进行了不同角度的分析:研究恭维应答句式的特征;研究年龄、性别、社会地位、教育背景等社会变量对恭维应答策略选择的影响;从跨文化角度对恭维应答策略进行了对比分析。学者们采用了不同的语料收集方式:(1)话语补全测试和问卷(BarnlundAkari 1985;Yuan 1996,(2)回想法(Knapp et al.1984),(3)角色扮演法(SatioBeechen 1997),(4)实地观察法(WolfsonMane 1981),(4)对自然交互对话的录音(Golato 2002a,Pomerantz 1978)。本文旨在分析年龄18至35岁的大学生和研究生群体微信在线会话中恭维应答使用上的特征。着重分析了微信在线会话中这一群体的恭维应答语的语言特征;恭维应答策略的总体分布;对比了男女性别使用恭维应答策略的不同并与前人研究口语语境下得出的结果加以对比分析。微信被认为是在线交际的一种媒介,其语境不同于口语和笔语语境的特点,会影响语言的使用。正如王建华在《关于语境的构成与分类》中提到:“网上聊天这种方式日益成为青少年交流的手段,这种新的媒介影响着语用交际……这种与传统语用不同的媒介体,可以视为一种新的语境因素。”(郑燕芳2005)。因此以下三个问题将会被讨论:(1)微信在线会话下的恭维应答语在语言使用方面有哪些特征?(2)微信在线会话下的恭维应答策略总体分布如何?与前人研究的自然会话中恭维应答策略的分布结果是否一致?(3)微信在线会话下,男女在恭维应答策略选择上是否相同?本文选取了50名经常使用微信的本科生和研究生作为研究对象,为使结果更加客观,其中选取的男女比例大致相等。并且要求每个人提供最少6条与恭维有关的聊天记录,每个人的聊天记录要来自于不同的交谈对象。经过语料筛选,最终得到300条相关语料。研究结果如下:(1)微信在线会话下的恭维应答的语言使用方面具有如下特征:使用口语词;短句;创新使用表情符号和标点符号。(2)微信在线会话中大学生和研究生群体的恭维应答策略是转移/回避策略占据优势,其次是拒绝和接受策略。这一结果与先前的学者研究认为当代的大学生更趋于接受赞美有所不同。说明即使在微信聊天时,这一群体仍遵循谦虚原则,考虑面子和礼貌。(3)微信在线会话中,男女在恭维应答策略的选择上具有显著差异(卡方值为9.828,P值0.007小于0.05,最小期望计数大于5)。女性多礼貌接受别人恭维,男性则倾向于回避,这与先前的学者得出的结论一致。不同之处在于女性拒绝别人的恭维也是多于男性的,这是因为本研究中女性收到的恭维大多是来自于男性对其外貌的恭维,而选择拒绝这样的恭维与女性更多考虑了自己的面子有关。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, Manesi Pomerantzan Golato, Li Junru and Feng Jianghong have made great contributions to the study of compliment and compliment response. Among them, the author analyzes compliment response from different angles: the characteristics of compliment response sentence, the influence of social variables such as age, sex, social status, educational background, etc, on the choice of compliment response strategy, and the influence of social variables such as age, sex, social status and educational background on the choice of compliment response strategy. This paper makes a comparative analysis of compliment response strategies from a cross-cultural perspective. Different data collection methods were used: (1) speech complement test and questionnaire (BarnlundAkari 1985 Yuan 1996, (2) Knapp et al.1984), (3) role playing method (Satio Beechen 1997), (4) Wolfson Mane 1981), (4 recording of natural interactive dialogue (Golato 2002aPomerantz 1978). The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of compliment response in online conversation of college students and graduate students aged 18 to 35. This paper focuses on the linguistic characteristics of the compliment responders in WeChat online conversations and the general distribution of compliment response strategies. The differences between male and female in the use of compliment response strategies were compared and compared with the results obtained from previous studies in oral context. WeChat is considered to be a medium for online communication, and its context is different from the characteristics of spoken and pen contexts, which will affect the use of language. As Wang Jianhua points out in the composition and Classification of context, "chatting online is increasingly becoming a means of communication among teenagers, and this new medium influences pragmatic communication." This medium, which is different from traditional pragmatics, can be regarded as a new contextual factor. " Zheng Yanfang 2005 Therefore, the following three questions will be discussed: (1) what are the characteristics of compliment responses in WeChat online conversations? (2) what are the overall distribution of compliment response strategies in WeChat online conversations? Is it consistent with the previous studies on the distribution of compliment response strategies in natural conversations? (3) under WeChat online conversation, are men and women the same in the choice of compliment response strategies? In order to make the results more objective, 50 undergraduates and postgraduates who often use WeChat were chosen to make the results more objective, in which the proportion of men and women was roughly equal. Each person is asked to provide at least 6 complimentary chat notes, each from a different subject. After data selection, 300 related data were obtained. The results are as follows: (1) the language use of compliment response under WeChat online conversation has the following characteristics: use of spoken words, short sentences, and short sentences; Creative use of emoji and punctuation. (2) the compliment response strategy of college students and graduate students in WeChat online conversation is dominated by transfer / avoidance strategy followed by rejection and acceptance strategy. This result is different from previous scholars' opinion that contemporary college students tend to accept praise. It shows that even in WeChat chat, this group still follows the principle of modesty, considering face and politeness. (3) WeChat online conversation, There were significant differences in the choice of compliment response strategies between men and women (the chi-square value was 9.828 P < 0.05 and the minimum expectation count was more than 5). Women politely accept compliments, men tend to avoid, which is consistent with previous scholars. The difference is that women also reject more compliments than men, because most of the compliments women received in this study came from men's compliments about their appearance. And the choice to refuse such compliments and women more consideration of their own face related.
【学位授予单位】：兰州理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 崔璨;;大学生微信问候语的文化语言学解读[J];吉林省教育学院学报(下旬);2014年08期

2 张爱萍;;中国英、日语学习者汉语赞扬应答言语行为中的反向概念迁移研究[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2014年01期

3 李文婷;;英美恭维语的应答模式对比[J];外国语文;2013年S1期

4 李明钺;;从话语分析角度看微信用语的特点[J];吉林广播电视大学学报;2013年05期

5 常明;;高校班主任微信管理模式的探究[J];中国科教创新导刊;2013年01期

6 覃凯;;微信在企业营销中的利与弊[J];电子商务;2012年11期

7 何姗;;微信在警务信息处理中的应用[J];计算机光盘软件与应用;2012年18期

8 党昊祺;;从传播学角度解构微信的信息传播模式[J];东南传播;2012年07期

9 李俊儒;;称赞语及其应答语对比研究[J];国外外语教学;2007年04期

10 黄国文;;电子语篇的特点[J];外语与外语教学;2005年12期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前1条

1 郑燕芳;网络言语行为分析[D];福建师范大学;2005年

，

本文编号：2059181