意义研究的流变:语义-语用界面视角

发布时间：2018-06-28 18:47

本文选题：意义理论 + 语义-语用界面　；参考：《外语与外语教学》2017年04期

【摘要】：本文旨在探讨意义研究的流变,聚焦于语境论和语义最简论两种对立的后格赖斯学说对经典格赖斯会话含义理论的批判与发展。经考察发现:1)针对格赖斯的"所言",语境论者采用扩展视角将语用因素或部分、或整体纳入所言,扩充经典格赖斯所言的内涵成分。而语义最简论者却采用窄化视角根除语用因素对语义的影响,保证语义的独立性,重构所言的触发因素;2)关于一般会话含义的处理,两派学者就其语用过程的性质形成三种解释路向:默认推理、语境推论和协同推理;3)围绕语用过程的解释,语境论和语义最简论就所言命题中的语用涉入倡导不同的补全路径,即强语境效应的自由充实和句法约束的逻辑扩展。本研究为该领域学者把握意义理论的新进展提供可行的观察视角和分析思路,也为初涉意义研究的新手描摹一幅概览意义理论发展脉络的清晰简图,以期推动意义研究的"博采-纵深"式发展。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to explore the evolution of the study of meaning, focusing on the criticism and development of the classical Grice's conversational implicature by two opposing post- Grice theories: contextualism and semantics. It is found that: 1) in response to Grice's "what he says", contextualists use an extended perspective to include pragmatic factors or parts, or the whole, and to expand the connotative elements of the classical Grice's remarks. On the other hand, the minimalist uses a narrow perspective to eradicate the influence of pragmatic factors on semantics, to ensure the independence of semantics, to reconstruct the trigger factors mentioned above, and to deal with the general conversational implicature. The two schools of scholars have formed three ways of explaining the nature of their pragmatic process: default reasoning, contextual inference and synergistic reasoning (3) the interpretation of the pragmatic process around which contextualism and semantics are most brief advocates different complementary approaches to the pragmatic involvement in the proposition. That is, the free enrichment of strong contextual effects and the logical expansion of syntactic constraints. This study provides a feasible visual angle and analytical thinking for the scholars in this field to grasp the new progress of the theory of meaning, and also provides a clear sketch of the development of the theory of meaning for the beginners of the preliminary study of meaning. In order to promote the significance of the study of the "extensive-depth" type of development.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“基于语科库的英汉话语标记语语义结构与语用功能研究”(项目编号:13BYY018) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目“困境求变:语用研究的经济分析视角”(项目编号:13WYB006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：H030

【相似文献】