异形法律术语规范化研究

发布时间：2018-08-24 10:19

【摘要】：随着国家“四个全面”战略布局的深入开展,依法治国也受到越来越多的重视。在这样的大背景下,推进法律语言的规范化显得尤为重要。而法律术语作为法律语言的核心,其规范化工作的重要性和紧迫性不言而喻。异形法律术语的规范化是法律术语规范工作的重要内容,本文将针对异形法律术语存在的一些问题进行规范化研究,并在“术语价”理论方法的基础之上,创造性地提出了一种解决异形法律术语规范化问题的新思路、新方法,希望能够将异形法律术语规范化工作落到实处,同时为推进依法治国尽一份绵薄之力。论文共分为七个部分,各部分具体内容如下:首先是绪论部分。主要包括研究对象、研究背景、研究综述、研究目的和意义、研究选材、研究思路和研究方法。第一章是“术语价”理论的介绍。提出了异形法律术语的四个术语价群,分别是认知价群、语义价群、语用价群和功能价群。其中,认知价群又包括普通认知价、专家认知价、语形价、易识价、模因结构价五个术语价;语义价群又包括理据价、语义透明价和反义系统价三个术语价;语用价群又包括频率价、分布价、地域价、语体价和时代价五个术语价;功能价群又包括反映价、突显价和释义元语言价三个术语价。第二章是异形法律术语的共性研究。我们从共性的角度出发,基于“术语价”的理论对异形法律术语进行了表层和深层特征分析与规范。首先是表层形式特征的分析,通过对1000组异形法律术语的分析,我们将其分成了成分逆序、同音近音现象、缩略、分段相同、个别字相同、用字完全不同和综合方式七种情况;然后是深层特征分析,结合异形法律术语的一些特殊情况,我们先后基于“专科语义三角”“模因论”和“语义三环”探讨了异形法律术语的命名、模因结构和语义透明度等方面的差异情况;最后在“术语价”理论的基础上结合具体的实例对一般的异形法律术语进行了规范化的操作演示。第三章是异形法律术语的个类研究。针对异形法律术语中翻译异形差异的情况对其进行了分析与规范。首先从正误译差、共存译差和地域译差等三个方面对异形法律术语的译差进行了分析,然后又结合“术语价”分别从正误译差、共存译差和地域译差等三个方面对其进行了译名统一与规范化的操作。第四章也是异形法律术语的个类研究。首先对异形法律术语中存在的新旧差进行了分析,并在“术语价”理论的基础上结合具体实例对其进行了规范化操作演示;然后又对正俗差的情况进行了分析,同样结合“术语价”理论对其进行了规范化操作。最后根据得出的结果检验某些异形法律术语的新称和正称是否一定比对应的旧称和俗称更适合作为主形。第五章是对异形法律术语规范化相关工作提出的一些建议。首先是异形法律术语规范化的流程,我们认为,异形法律术语规范化工作应该遵循以下几个流程:1.术语搜集;2.分类整理、描写分析;3.确立主形、进行规范;4.征询各界意见、形成规范文件;5.构建术语数据库;6.动态维护与更新术语库。其次是异形法律术语规范化的原则,我们认为异形法律术语规范化至少应遵循以下几个原则:俗成性原则、理据性原则、系统性原则和简明性原则。最后我们对异形法律术语分类规范问题以及异形法律术语的规范化研究对法律新术语定名的指导问题谈了一些看法。最后是结语部分。首先是对本文的研究进行了总结,然后指出了本文研究存在的一些不足之处,最后谈了本文研究未来的可拓展空间。
[Abstract]:With the development of the "four comprehensive" strategic layout of the country, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law. Under such a background, it is particularly important to promote the standardization of legal language. Normalization is an important part of legal terminology standardization work. This paper will study some problems existing in abnormal legal terminology standardization, and creatively put forward a new way to solve the problem of abnormal legal terminology standardization based on the theory and method of "terminology price", hoping to regulate abnormal legal terminology. The thesis is divided into seven parts, each part of the specific content is as follows: First, the introduction part. It mainly includes the research object, research background, research summary, research purpose and significance, research materials, research ideas and research methods. The first chapter is the theory of term price. Four term price groups of abnormal legal terms are put forward, which are cognitive price group, semantic price group, pragmatic price group and functional price group. Three term valences; pragmatic valence group includes five term valences: frequency valence, distributive valence, regional valence, stylistic valence and temporal valence; functional valence group includes three term valences: reflective valence, salient valence and metalinguistic valence. The first is the analysis of the surface and deep features of legal terminology. Through the analysis of 1000 groups of abnormal legal terminology, we divide them into seven types: inverse order of components, homonym, abbreviation, segmental similarity, single character similarity, completely different use of words and comprehensive methods. According to the special circumstances of the abnormal legal terms, we have discussed the differences in the naming, memetic structure and semantic transparency of the abnormal legal terms based on the "specialized semantic triangle", "memetics" and "semantic triangle". Finally, we have discussed the general differences based on the "term price" theory and specific examples. Chapter three is the category study of the abnormal legal terminology. It analyzes and standardizes the abnormal differences in the translation of the abnormal legal terminology. Firstly, it analyzes the translation errors of the abnormal legal terminology from three aspects: correctness and error, coexistence of translation errors and regional translation errors. Combining with the term price, this paper unifies and standardizes the translated names from three aspects: correctness and error, coexistence and regional difference. Chapter 4 is also a specific study of the abnormal legal terms. The example demonstrates its standardized operation, and then analyzes the situation of correctness and vulgarity, and carries out the standardized operation with the theory of "term price". Finally, according to the results obtained, it tests whether the new and proper terms of some abnormal legal terms are more suitable for the main form than the corresponding old ones. First of all, we think that the standardization of legal terminology of special-shaped law should follow the following procedures: 1. terminology collection; 2. classification, description and analysis; 3. establish the main form, standardization; 4. solicit opinions from all walks of life, form a normative text. 5. Constructing terminology database; 6. Maintaining and updating terminology database dynamically. Secondly, the principle of standardization of abnormal legal terminology. We believe that the standardization of abnormal legal terminology should follow at least the following principles: the principle of vulgarity, the principle of motivation, the principle of systematicness and the principle of conciseness. The last part is the conclusion. Firstly, it summarizes the research of this paper, then points out some shortcomings of this study, and finally discusses the future of this study.
【学位授予单位】：鲁东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】