平面酒广告中视觉隐喻的多模态认知—语用研究
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of information technology and multimedia technology, the way people convey information is no longer confined to the pure text representation, but extended to the interwoven multi-modal discourse of text, image and sound. Forceville (1996, 2009) and other scholars first carried out the study of image metaphor, and then proposed multi-modal metaphor on this basis. At present, many scholars have studied image metaphor and multimodal metaphor. The genre mainly involves advertisements, cartoons, gestures and so on. The research contents include the extension of conceptual metaphor theory to the test of non-verbal domain, and the operation mechanism of multimodal metaphor. However, most of the relevant studies are conducted from a single functional or cognitive perspective, with relatively single perspectives and low reliability. The use of corpus to explore visual metaphor from a cognitive-pragmatic perspective is in line with the new trend of cognitive-pragmatic research and is conducive to expanding multimodal implicitness. Graphic advertising is a means of communication that relies on visual symbols: images and words to persuade consumers to buy goods. It uses consumers'multi-modal perception ability to metaphorically convey advertising intentions. In advertising circles, wine advertising is due to economic development and people's living water. Therefore, based on the conceptual metaphor theory from the cognitive perspective and the multimodal metaphor theory developed on this basis, and the relevance theory from the pragmatic perspective, this paper explores the visual metaphor in the plane wine advertisement together, with the emphasis on the following three questions Questions: (1) What are the types and frequencies of visual metaphors in print wine advertisements, and what are their characteristics? (2) How do different types of visual metaphors construct meanings in print wine advertisements? (3) What are the cognitive and pragmatic functions of visual metaphors in print wine advertisements? Forceville (2008) and Zhao Xiufeng (2010) classify visual metaphors into frameworks to identify and classify visual metaphors in print wine advertisements. The latest multimedia data processing and analysis software Nvivo11 is used as a tool to annotate and statistics data by importing, editing, coding and creating nodes. The study finds that: (1) According to the modal types involved, visual metaphors in print wine advertisements can be divided into two categories: single-modal metaphor (43.3%) and multi-modal metaphor (56.7%) and multi-modal metaphor (pictorial-textual metaphor). According to the relationship between source domain and target domain, the two types of visual metaphors can be divided into four types: contextual metaphor (16.7%), mixed metaphor (23.3%), juxtaposed metaphor (26.7%) and composite metaphor (33.3%). Through comparison, it is found that the visual metaphor of ALCOHOLIC DRINK IS WOMAN is often used in print wine advertisements, and different types of wine involve different visual metaphors due to different taste: beer is refreshing, commonly used BEER IS SEA; wine is mellow, WINE IS RED SILK; liquor stimulation, commonly used VODKA IS PEAK, etc. 36.7% of the metaphorical mapping processes involve metonymy, which provides the necessary basis for metaphor and constructs meaning through interaction and integration. (2) The number of visual metaphors in print wine advertisements is different, but the interpretation process is similar, including two steps: the ostensive process and the inferential process. The audience shows the information intention and the communicative intention behind it; for the audience, when they feel the explicit stimulus, they will read the context (including the text context and the text context) carefully to understand the information intention, then pursue the communicative intention and interpret the visual metaphor using the principle of optimal relevance. In the end, the cognitive environment of the audience changes. Although the interpretation of visual metaphors in print wine advertisements is a process of seeking optimal relevance, identifying visual metaphors and pursuing the merchant's information and communicative intentions, different types of visual perceptions do exist. The key to interpreting contextual metaphor is to fully understand the context and infer the source domain; the key to interpreting juxtapositional metaphor is to discover the contrastive relationship between the source domain and the target domain, in which text, encyclopedic knowledge and experience play an important role; mixed metaphor and composite metaphor are similar, and both source domain and target domain have been presented. Grasping the similarity between the two domains is the key to interpreting the two visual metaphors. Compared with graphic multi-modal metaphors, image single-modal metaphors provide relatively little information. Therefore, in order to make the audience understand metaphors correctly, the image single-modal metaphors used by advertisers are mostly simple metaphors. (3) The visual wine metaphors in plane wine advertisements are persuasive. Persuasion is the most important function, including cognitive persuasion and emotional persuasion. Cognitive persuasion attracts attention by creating semantic conflicts. Part of the mapping highlights the advantages of alcohol, ignores the disadvantages of excessive drinking and creates physical and psychological harmfulness of drinking and other activities. Similarity can be realized in three ways; emotional persuasion can be realized in two ways: one is to convey emotions through the source domain, such as love; the other is to elicit positive emotions from the audience through novel metaphors or similar experiences. The realization of information function depends on two ways: using polite utterances to euphemistically convey intention, reducing the audience's distrust of wine advertisements; using old words to talk about new things to create new meanings. The aesthetic function can not be ignored: a novel metaphor is full of creativity; and different types of wine use different color metaphors to highlight different liquors. It is the rich function of visual metaphor that makes it widely used in print wine advertisements. This paper further proves conceptual metaphor, especially multimodal metaphor, comprehensively from the cognitive and pragmatic perspectives. It is of great significance to explore the visual metaphor in plane wine advertisement for expanding the study of metaphor and multimodal metaphor. In addition, from the practical aspect, this paper provides useful inspiration for the design of plane wine advertisement. Advertisers can convey information intention and communicative intention through visual metaphor. At the same time, this paper also helps consumers to be objective. Accurately understand flat wine advertising, rational consumption.
【学位授予单位】:江南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H030
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈彦瑞;;国内外多模态隐喻研究新动态[J];许昌学院学报;2013年06期
2 白美娴;;人-机-人交流中符号模态选择及其意义整合——以多模态语篇博客网页分析为例[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
3 张帮印;;话语意义的多模态构建——以2010年上海世博会会徽为例[J];复旦外国语言文学论丛;2009年02期
4 韦琴红;;论多模态话语中的模态、媒介与情态[J];外语教学;2009年04期
5 曾方本;;多模态符号整合后语篇意义的嬗变与调控——兼论从语言语篇分析到多模态语篇分析转向时期的若干问题[J];外语教学;2009年06期
6 张时倩;;中外两则企业图标的多模态对比分析[J];北方文学(下半月);2010年05期
7 李毅;石磊;;教学中的多模态隐喻——应用隐喻研究的新方向[J];外语电化教学;2010年03期
8 谢竞贤;董剑桥;;论多媒体与多模态条件下的大学英语听力教学[J];外语电化教学;2010年06期
9 胡壮麟;;多模态小品的问世与发展[J];外语电化教学;2010年04期
10 丁薇;;意义的多模态构建与大学生的多元表达能力研究[J];哈尔滨职业技术学院学报;2011年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王爱东;谷珍;杨燕平;白鹤;;多媒体多模态教学在民办高校大学英语教学中的适用性及效果研究[A];语言与文化研究(第十四辑)[C];2014年
2 张霄军;;多模态语料库:抢救濒危语言的有效途径[A];民族语言文字信息技术研究——第十一届全国民族语言文字信息学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
3 夏凡;王宏;;多模态情感数据标注方法与实现[A];第一届建立和谐人机环境联合学术会议(HHME2005)论文集[C];2005年
4 赵贤;;多模态基底系统性质研究[A];2010年全国应用逻辑研讨会会议论文集[C];2010年
5 ;An Overview of Metaphor Research[A];语言与文化研究(第一辑)[C];2007年
6 张友安;胡云安;周绍磊;;Hammerstein系统的多模态模型及其两步辨识法[A];1996中国控制与决策学术年会论文集[C];1996年
7 钟若飞;郭华东;王为民;朱博勤;;SZ-4多模态传感器辐射模态数据处理与应用评价研究[A];第十四届全国遥感技术学术交流会论文摘要集[C];2003年
8 康志峰;;口译中多模态的AA研究[A];第十四届全国科技翻译研讨会论文汇编[C];2011年
9 李妙;;隐喻力、创造力与儿童教学(英文)[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
10 安虹;;A Comparative Study of Bird Metaphors in Chinese and English Poetry[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 记者 刘垠;在分子水平上认识疾病[N];大众科技报;2009年
2 罗绵卫 王建成;中国航天科工高分专项实现零突破[N];中国航天报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 高静;信息物理融合系统中基于多模态数据的事件监测问题研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
2 聂为之;多模态媒体数据分析关键技术研究[D];天津大学;2014年
3 刘鹏;慢性伤口光学仿体的多尺度多模态医学影像技术研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2016年
4 柴瑞峰;小儿神经重症患者术后多模态监测的临床研究[D];新疆医科大学;2017年
5 苗迪;基于特征层与分数层的多模态生物特征融合[D];中国科学技术大学;2017年
6 张征;英语课堂多模态读写能力实证研究[D];山东大学;2011年
7 李宝磊;多元优化过程记忆算法及动静条件下多模态寻优研究[D];云南大学;2015年
8 王雷全;基于图模型的多模态社会媒体分析[D];北京邮电大学;2016年
9 潘鸣威;多模态视角下的口语交际能力:重构与探究[D];上海外国语大学;2011年
10 逯波;多模态媒体信息检索技术研究[D];东北大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王牧;平面酒广告中视觉隐喻的多模态认知—语用研究[D];江南大学;2017年
2 奎清泉;禁烟广告的多模态隐喻研究[D];云南师范大学;2017年
3 吴敏;封面漫画多模态隐喻的表征机制研究[D];南京师范大学;2017年
4 常院利;商业广告中的多模态隐喻分析[D];山西师范大学;2017年
5 樊瑾;纪录片多模态语篇的动态构建研究[D];西北大学;2017年
6 尹紫玮;中文车贴中多模态隐喻的意义构建[D];西安外国语大学;2017年
7 刘洁;大学英语课堂中的多模态话语对学生多元识读能力的影响[D];西南大学;2015年
8 邵荣;牛津版高中英语教材的多模态语篇分析[D];西南大学;2015年
9 王玉竹;中美报刊政治漫画的批评性多模态话语分析[D];西南大学;2015年
10 周德英;基于多模态互动意义的公益广告研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
,本文编号:2226465
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2226465.html