汉英专有名词非范畴化的对比研究
[Abstract]:Language, like anything that develops, is a dynamic process of continuous development and innovation. It advances in the process of keeping and breaking the balance, which will inevitably lead to more novel language phenomena. To make up for the gap between cognitive concepts and language expression. Human beings use their cognitive ability to reprocess and utilize their language resources in a certain way, which not only reflects the creativity of language, but also reflects the innovation of human cognition. The non-categorization of language is one of the manifestations of the continuous development of language. Decategorization is the process by which a member of a category loses some of the features or functions of the category and acquires some of the features or functions of other categories. The present study finds that there is a phenomenon of non-categorization in both English and Chinese. Based on the theory of non-categorization, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the phenomenon of proper nouns' de-categorization in both Chinese and English in terms of lexical meaning and functional meaning. It shows that language is from categorization-non-categorization-re-categorization. It is an important stage in the process of categorization. It is not only the result of language development, but also the way and way of language innovation. The change of language entity in meaning and function is not a mutation, but a gradual change, or return to the original state, or enter into a new category, or itself into two, belong to the original category and the new category, which is a continuous process of change. The theory of non-categorization provides a new perspective for the contrastive study of Chinese and English nouns, and provides a more scientific and reasonable explanation for more "unconventional" linguistic phenomena in language. In addition, the cognitive mechanism in the process of de-categorization is also discussed. From the perspective of metonymy, metonymy and the subjective meaning of metonymy are the operational mechanisms in the phenomenon of non-categorization of proper nouns in Chinese and English. The existing meanings of words are enriched constantly, which not only accord with the law of language development, but also accord with the economic principle of language. The process of decategorization of nouns not only reflects the power of language development and creation, but also reflects the basic way of human cognition. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the theoretical basis, introduced the definition of non-categorization, importance; The operational mechanism of non-categorization, and the relationship between de-categorization and categorization, point out that de-categorization is as important as categorization, and that non-categorization is a dynamic development process. It plays a very important role in explaining the changing phenomenon of "abnormal" language; The second chapter analyzes the different expressions of Chinese proper nouns and English nouns in terms of word meaning and part of speech, and compares the different expressions between Chinese and English. The third chapter analyzes in detail the operational mechanism of proper nouns in the process of de-categorization and the role of metonymy. The last chapter is the conclusion of the article and the deficiency of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:西安外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H146.2;H314.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于艳;陈全献;;探究去范畴化的定义[J];科技信息;2009年02期
2 罗建平;;语言非范畴化理论简述及讨论[J];广东石油化工学院学报;2011年02期
3 贾志高,程杰;隐喻语言中的范畴化[J];山东师大外国语学院学报;2000年02期
4 刘润清,刘正光;名词非范畴化的特征[J];语言教学与研究;2004年03期
5 陈建生;杨玉娟;;词义的范畴化与非范畴化[J];长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
6 张士奇;;模糊语言与原型范畴化理论[J];科技信息(科学教研);2008年14期
7 王莉;;限制性和非限制性关系分句使用规律的次范畴化研究[J];长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
8 梅晴;;诌议语言的范畴化及其过程[J];读与写(教育教学刊);2010年07期
9 齐红霞;谢勇;;名词的功能游移是名词非范畴化的结果[J];兰州教育学院学报;2010年05期
10 宋江录;;语言非范畴化理论研究评介[J];河北北方学院学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 宗守云;;范畴化理论与四个世界理论[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
2 黄伟红;;类典型论,范畴化和词义扩展[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
3 陆红艳;;非范畴化视角下的多义性分析[A];首届海峡两岸外语教学与研究学术研讨会暨福建省外国语文学会2011年会论文集[C];2011年
4 韩习武;王金勇;;汉英动词次范畴化对应关系的形式描写[A];黑龙江省计算机学会2009年学术交流年会论文集[C];2010年
5 韩习武;刘春阳;;汉语动词次范畴化的形式描写[A];黑龙江省计算机学会2009年学术交流年会论文集[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 陈勇;汉语数量范畴及其非范畴化研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
2 陈伟;范畴化理论中几个问题的研究[D];华南理工大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘昭;《汉俄大词典》单字条目词类标注实证研究[D];四川外国语大学;2015年
2 罗亚喃;范畴化的剖析:fMRI和ERP研究综述[D];南京航空航天大学;2014年
3 郭建强;范畴化理论在高中英语词汇教学中的实证研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2015年
4 张海宁;范畴化理论在高中英语词汇教学中的实证研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
5 沈丽双;中国日报中名词非范畴化现象的研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
6 赵璐;《论语》中“仁”的认知语言学研究[D];西南大学;2016年
7 韩秋静;基于范畴化理论的初中英语词汇教学研究[D];青海师范大学;2016年
8 张丽晶;基于基本范畴化理论的教学方法对初中生英语词汇习得影响研究[D];扬州大学;2016年
9 崔璨;基于范畴化理论的高中英语词汇教学研究[D];延安大学;2016年
10 宋琦;“七A八B”的非范畴化数词分析[D];长沙理工大学;2015年
,本文编号:2380115
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2380115.html