儿童对请求言语行为理解的比较研究
[Abstract]:The acquisition and development of children's language is very rapid and has its unique regularity. The characteristics of children's language make linguists and psychologists at home and abroad have a strong interest in the study of children's language. Domestic researches on children's language are mostly focused on the case study of children's language characteristics or language acquisition, but there are few researches on one or several speech acts of children. Based on Searle's speech act theory (1965-1969-1979) and the request strategy put forward by Bloom Kolka et al. (1984), this study explores the understanding of the speech act of request in children aged 3 and 5. The purpose is to answer the following two research questions: 1. What are the similarities and differences between the three and five year old Chinese children's understanding of direct request, statutory indirect request and non-prescriptive indirect request? 2. How does the unsatisfied condition or sincere condition affect the understanding of the request language in Chinese children aged 3 and 5? In this study, the story completion method (Story Completion Task Method) is used to design the experiment, and the story completion method is partially adjusted. In this study, two groups of experiments were carried out. In experiment 1, the preparation conditions, the age of the subjects and the request strategy were taken as independent variables, and in experiment 2, the sincere condition, the age of the subjects and the request strategy were taken as independent variables. In each group, 18 story scenarios were set up, and 20 subjects in two age groups (three and five years old) were tested, and the results were analyzed and compared. The results show that: (1) the children in the two age groups have better understanding of direct and indirect requests than of non-prescriptive indirect requests. In terms of differences, (2) first of all, five-year-old children as a whole have a better understanding than three-year-old children; Secondly, the three-year-old child has a relatively better understanding of the indirect statutory request than the direct request, while the five-year-old child has a similar understanding of the direct request and the statutory indirect request. (2) from the point of view of the appropriate conditions, In cases where conditions of readiness are not met, failure to satisfy genuine conditions can have a greater negative impact on children's understanding of the language of request, which means that children can understand the conditions of preparation earlier and better. Instead of sincere conditions. (1) the lack of satisfaction of preparatory conditions significantly reduces the correct response of three-year-olds to requests, while the understanding of five-year-olds does not have a significant impact, This shows that the child has begun to understand the preparatory conditions by the age of three and by the age of five has been able to fully grasp this condition. (2) the lack of satisfaction of the sincere conditions will greatly hinder the understanding of the two groups of children, This suggests that children have begun to understand the sincere condition at or before the age of five, but that it is not yet fully grasped. The present study is expected to provide data for relevant studies on children's understanding of speech acts and enrich existing data. At the same time, the findings of this study can help us to understand the rules of preschool children's language development to a certain extent, thus promoting communication with children and better understanding of children's language development.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:H136
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 涂青;浅谈言语行为和言语行为能力[J];乐山师范学院学报;2003年08期
2 刘卫兵;;跨文化交际中的言语行为[J];三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年S1期
3 王爱华,吴贵凉;对英汉拒绝言语行为直接性层面的调查研究[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
4 付习涛;论言语行为的性质[J];南京社会科学;2005年04期
5 钱乐奕;道歉言语行为中请求策略的使用[J];合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
6 刘思;樊葳葳;;言语行为集理论及其应用初探[J];外语教育;2005年00期
7 胡方芳;;对言语行为构成规则的重新思考[J];重庆社会科学;2007年05期
8 刘琼;殷正坤;;虚构话语是一种言语行为吗[J];高等工程教育研究;2008年S1期
9 张晶;危鸣辉;;英汉外交语篇言语行为构建及其异同[J];沙洋师范高等专科学校学报;2008年06期
10 沈志;;请求言语行为面面观[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年S1期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 陈咪咪;;批评言语行为中日对照研究——以电视剧为题材[A];福建省外国语文学会2012年会论文集[C];2012年
2 林大津;;论言语行为“得体性”探讨中的概念混乱[A];福建省外国语文学会2002年会论文集[C];2002年
3 郑立华;;试论言语行为的社会意义[A];中国社会语言学(2004年第2期)[C];2004年
4 叶华;;医生言语行为浅析[A];2008年浙江省神经病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
5 唐炎;龚坚;郭礼;张新;;基于言语行为的体育教师课堂角色的实证研究[A];第八届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(一)[C];2007年
6 晏小萍;;性别、权势与礼貌策略在汉语请求、拒绝言语行为中的表现[A];中国社会语言学(2004年第2期)[C];2004年
7 陈俊;张积家;张艳辉;;教师管教言语行为语效的比较研究[A];第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2007年
8 胡友信;;“THANK YOU”用语的言语行为与作用[A];外语语言教学研究——黑龙江省外国语学会第十次学术年会论文集[C];1996年
9 黄永红;;群体文化和个体文化在言语行为中的体现[A];中国英汉语比较研究会第七次全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王蕊;汉语“说”类言语行为标记研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年
2 文兵;汉英维护言语行为[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
3 唐礼勇;中国人言语行为的社会学分析[D];浙江大学;2006年
4 关英明;现代汉语致歉言语行为研究[D];吉林大学;2014年
5 尚晓明;人和世界语境中的言语行为建构与透视研究[D];上海外国语大学;2008年
6 谢龙新;文学叙事与言语行为[D];华中师范大学;2011年
7 赵明炜;会话的交互言语行为模式[D];上海外国语大学;2004年
8 段芸;言语行为语力的认知语言学研究[D];西南大学;2011年
9 崔蓬克;言语行为视角下的政府微博语言研究[D];华东师范大学;2014年
10 曾莉;非规约间接否定:作为语用策略的言语行为[D];华中科技大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 胡树伟;俄语言语交际中的“高兴”类言语行为[D];中国人民大学;2009年
2 伊曼;跨文化交际中的言语行为[D];东北财经大学;2007年
3 洪姗;中澳大学生警告言语行为对比研究[D];安徽大学;2012年
4 邱竹;拒绝言语行为的性别差异研究[D];渤海大学;2015年
5 孙晓;韩国语请求言语行为的谦逊表现研究[D];中国海洋大学;2015年
6 孔雪龙;英汉广告中的言语行为转喻对比研究[D];南京财经大学;2014年
7 李文波;中日道歉言语行为的对比研究[D];吉林财经大学;2016年
8 王君寒;会话诗歌言语行为研究[D];江苏大学;2016年
9 吉晓彤;东乡语与兰州方言拒绝言语行为的语用策略对比研究[D];兰州大学;2016年
10 KWON JOO HEE(权珠姬);中韩道歉言语行为对比研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
,本文编号:2384246
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2384246.html