R-A-C-C架构：《圣经》隐喻阐释的语用认知研究
发布时间：2021-03-08 14:35
《圣经》不仅是基督教的一部圣典,同时也是西方文明的文化基础和文学基础。20世纪中叶以来,人们开始将《圣经》从整体上看作是一部伟大的文学著作,并在西方形成了一门新的研究学科。20世纪后半叶,在西方开始形成用文学批评理论和手段来阐释《圣经》的热潮。《圣经》研究中重要的一个方面是针对圣经隐喻（包括寓言故事）的研究。隐喻可以说是《圣经》中最常见的一种语言现象,它贯穿于《圣经》的新约和旧约。国内外专门针对圣经隐喻的研究大多是在文学和文化维度上进行的。从认知语言学和语用学的层面上对圣经隐喻进行专门研究,目前国内外并不多见。本研究是基于以下假设而展开:圣经隐喻是一种特殊的语言现象,同时也是言语交际活动的一种特殊形式。这一假设为从认知语言学和语用学视角研究圣经隐喻现象提供了可能。该研究以语用学中的关联理论（RT）和顺应理论（AT）以及认知语言学中的概念隐喻理论（CMT）和概念整合理论（CBT）为理论基础,以经验现实主义为哲学基础,试图创建一个R-A-C-C架构,此架构可以作为圣经隐喻阐释的理论框架。R-A-C-C架构的创建,主要是基于以下理论对比:第一,目前国内外还没有一个相对理想化的理论和应用架构,...
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：243 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgement
Abbreviati
Abstract
中文摘要
List of Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Lead-in remark
1.2 The study of biblical metaphor in retrospect
1.3 Rationale of the research
1.4 Research objective
1.5 Methodology and data for the research
1.6 Layout of the research
Chapter 2 Delimiting of Metaphors
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Metaphor reconsidered
2.2.1 Defining metaphors
2.2.2 The classification of metaphors
2.2.2.1 General classification
2.2.2.2 Lakoff & Johnson’s classification
2.2.3 Metaphor production and function
2.2.3.1 Metaphor production
2.2.3.2 The function of metaphor
2.2.4 Metaphor comprehension
2.2.4.1 The recognition of metaphor
2.2.4.2 The inference of metaphorical meaning
2.3 Metaphor in relation to language, communication, and cognition
2.3.1 Language and communication reviewed
2.3.2 Metaphor and communication
2.3.3 Metaphor and cognition
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Literature Review on the Theoretical Background of Metaphor Studies
3.1 Traditional assumptions to metaphors
3.1.1 The substitution theory
3.1.2 The comparison theory
3.1.3 The interaction theory
3.2 Pragmatic assumptions to metaphors
3.2.1 The Gricean perspective
3.2.2 Searle’s perspective
3.2.3 The relevant perspective
3.2.4 The adaptive perspective
3.3 Cognitive assumptions to metaphors
3.3.1 Image schema
3.3.2 The conceptual metaphor theory
3.3.3 The conceptual blending theory
3.3.3.1 Mental space theory
3.3.3.2 Basic processing of CBT
3.3.3.3 Universal features of blending
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 R-A-C-C Framework for Biblical Metaphor Interpretation
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Theoretical considerations in establishing a framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.2.1 Pragmatic concerns
4.2.2 Cognitive concerns
4.3 The philosophical basis for establishing the framework
4.3.1 Experiential realism
4.3.2 Pragmatic-cognitive meaning from experiential realism
4.3.3 The necessities for establishing R-A-C-C framework
4.4 A proposed framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.1 Relevance-adaptation framework to biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.2 A tentative CMT-CIT framework to biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.3 A comprehensive R-A-C-C framework for biblical metaphor interpretati
4.4.3.1 The possibility of constructing R-A-C-C
4.4.3.2 The primary manifestation of R-A-C-C framework
4.4.3.3 The ultimate version of R-A-C-C framework
4.5 A description of R-A-C-C framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.5.1 Interpreted from the perspective of metaphorical inference within R-A-C-C model
4.5.2 Interpreted from the cognitive mapping and blending process
4.5.3 Interpreted from the addressee’s cognitive subjectivity
4.6 Summary
Chapter 5 R-A-C-C Approach to Metaphors in the Old Testament
5.1 Introduction
5.2 The characteristics of metaphors in the Old Testament
5.3 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Law
5.3.1 Case study in Genesis
5.3.1.1 Main content
5.3.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.3.2 Case study in Exodus
5.3.2.1 Main content
5.3.2.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.4 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Prophets
5.4.1 Case study in Isaiah
5.4.1.1 Main content
5.4.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.5 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Writings
5.5.1 Case study in Psalms
5.5.1.1 Main content
5.5.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.6 Summary
Chapter 6 R-A-C-C Approach to Metaphors in New Testament
6.1 Introduction
6.2 The characteristics of metaphors in the New Testament
6.3 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Gospels
6.3.1 Case study of the sample parable 1
6.3.1.1 Main content
6.3.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
6.3.2 Case study of the sample parable 2
6.3.2.1 Main content
6.3.2.2 R-A-C-C analysis
6.4 Reflections on the superiorities of R-A-C-C approach to biblical metaphors
6.5 Summary
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Findings of the study
7.3 Implications of the study
7.4 Limitations of the study
7.5 Suggestions for further research
References
Appendice
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]基于模因论的知识转移进程分析[J]. 尹丕安,段婷婷,李健. 情报理论与实践. 2010(08)
[2]基于效应决策模式的认知言语交际分析[J]. 尹丕安,李健,延宏. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2010(01)
[3]量词“门、种、类”的用法及其认知基础——对外汉语量词教学个案研究之三[J]. 缑瑞隆,田明秋. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版). 2009(03)
[4]言语交际和传输过程中的话语原则分析[J]. 尹丕安. 西安外国语大学学报. 2008(01)
[5]圣言、隐喻和意义的诠释[J]. 刘锋. 四川外语学院学报. 2007(02)
[6]顺应—关联连续体下的语境及语义动态性分析[J]. 尹丕安. 语言教学与研究. 2007(02)
[7]模因论与隐喻的认知理据[J]. 尹丕安. 西安外国语学院学报. 2005(02)
[8]从认知语境及关联的视角探讨翻译文本的建构[J]. 尹丕安. 西安石油大学学报(社会科学版). 2004(04)
[9]从话语的认知层面解析翻译与语言的表层结构和深层结构[J]. 尹丕安. 外语教学. 2004(05)
[10]SB与RT的整合性研究[J]. 蒋勇,马玉蕾. 外语学刊. 2003(01)
博士论文
[1]圣经寓言故事的认知阐释[D]. 王磊.上海外国语大学 2008
[2]C-R-A模式：言语交际的三维阐释[D]. 廖巧云.上海外国语大学 2005
本文编号：3071213
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：243 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgement
Abbreviati
Abstract
中文摘要
List of Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Lead-in remark
1.2 The study of biblical metaphor in retrospect
1.3 Rationale of the research
1.4 Research objective
1.5 Methodology and data for the research
1.6 Layout of the research
Chapter 2 Delimiting of Metaphors
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Metaphor reconsidered
2.2.1 Defining metaphors
2.2.2 The classification of metaphors
2.2.2.1 General classification
2.2.2.2 Lakoff & Johnson’s classification
2.2.3 Metaphor production and function
2.2.3.1 Metaphor production
2.2.3.2 The function of metaphor
2.2.4 Metaphor comprehension
2.2.4.1 The recognition of metaphor
2.2.4.2 The inference of metaphorical meaning
2.3 Metaphor in relation to language, communication, and cognition
2.3.1 Language and communication reviewed
2.3.2 Metaphor and communication
2.3.3 Metaphor and cognition
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Literature Review on the Theoretical Background of Metaphor Studies
3.1 Traditional assumptions to metaphors
3.1.1 The substitution theory
3.1.2 The comparison theory
3.1.3 The interaction theory
3.2 Pragmatic assumptions to metaphors
3.2.1 The Gricean perspective
3.2.2 Searle’s perspective
3.2.3 The relevant perspective
3.2.4 The adaptive perspective
3.3 Cognitive assumptions to metaphors
3.3.1 Image schema
3.3.2 The conceptual metaphor theory
3.3.3 The conceptual blending theory
3.3.3.1 Mental space theory
3.3.3.2 Basic processing of CBT
3.3.3.3 Universal features of blending
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 R-A-C-C Framework for Biblical Metaphor Interpretation
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Theoretical considerations in establishing a framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.2.1 Pragmatic concerns
4.2.2 Cognitive concerns
4.3 The philosophical basis for establishing the framework
4.3.1 Experiential realism
4.3.2 Pragmatic-cognitive meaning from experiential realism
4.3.3 The necessities for establishing R-A-C-C framework
4.4 A proposed framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.1 Relevance-adaptation framework to biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.2 A tentative CMT-CIT framework to biblical metaphor interpretation
4.4.3 A comprehensive R-A-C-C framework for biblical metaphor interpretati
4.4.3.1 The possibility of constructing R-A-C-C
4.4.3.2 The primary manifestation of R-A-C-C framework
4.4.3.3 The ultimate version of R-A-C-C framework
4.5 A description of R-A-C-C framework for biblical metaphor interpretation
4.5.1 Interpreted from the perspective of metaphorical inference within R-A-C-C model
4.5.2 Interpreted from the cognitive mapping and blending process
4.5.3 Interpreted from the addressee’s cognitive subjectivity
4.6 Summary
Chapter 5 R-A-C-C Approach to Metaphors in the Old Testament
5.1 Introduction
5.2 The characteristics of metaphors in the Old Testament
5.3 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Law
5.3.1 Case study in Genesis
5.3.1.1 Main content
5.3.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.3.2 Case study in Exodus
5.3.2.1 Main content
5.3.2.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.4 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Prophets
5.4.1 Case study in Isaiah
5.4.1.1 Main content
5.4.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.5 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Writings
5.5.1 Case study in Psalms
5.5.1.1 Main content
5.5.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
5.6 Summary
Chapter 6 R-A-C-C Approach to Metaphors in New Testament
6.1 Introduction
6.2 The characteristics of metaphors in the New Testament
6.3 R-A-C-C approach to the metaphors in the Gospels
6.3.1 Case study of the sample parable 1
6.3.1.1 Main content
6.3.1.2 R-A-C-C analysis
6.3.2 Case study of the sample parable 2
6.3.2.1 Main content
6.3.2.2 R-A-C-C analysis
6.4 Reflections on the superiorities of R-A-C-C approach to biblical metaphors
6.5 Summary
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Findings of the study
7.3 Implications of the study
7.4 Limitations of the study
7.5 Suggestions for further research
References
Appendice
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]基于模因论的知识转移进程分析[J]. 尹丕安,段婷婷,李健. 情报理论与实践. 2010(08)
[2]基于效应决策模式的认知言语交际分析[J]. 尹丕安,李健,延宏. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2010(01)
[3]量词“门、种、类”的用法及其认知基础——对外汉语量词教学个案研究之三[J]. 缑瑞隆,田明秋. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版). 2009(03)
[4]言语交际和传输过程中的话语原则分析[J]. 尹丕安. 西安外国语大学学报. 2008(01)
[5]圣言、隐喻和意义的诠释[J]. 刘锋. 四川外语学院学报. 2007(02)
[6]顺应—关联连续体下的语境及语义动态性分析[J]. 尹丕安. 语言教学与研究. 2007(02)
[7]模因论与隐喻的认知理据[J]. 尹丕安. 西安外国语学院学报. 2005(02)
[8]从认知语境及关联的视角探讨翻译文本的建构[J]. 尹丕安. 西安石油大学学报(社会科学版). 2004(04)
[9]从话语的认知层面解析翻译与语言的表层结构和深层结构[J]. 尹丕安. 外语教学. 2004(05)
[10]SB与RT的整合性研究[J]. 蒋勇,马玉蕾. 外语学刊. 2003(01)
博士论文
[1]圣经寓言故事的认知阐释[D]. 王磊.上海外国语大学 2008
[2]C-R-A模式：言语交际的三维阐释[D]. 廖巧云.上海外国语大学 2005
本文编号：3071213
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/3071213.html
