来去荒岛与鲁滨逊的自然法政治抉择

发布时间：2017-12-28 21:36

本文关键词：来去荒岛与鲁滨逊的自然法政治抉择　出处：《外国文学研究》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基于自然法,鲁滨逊占领了荒岛,并对先后来到荒岛的人采取了不同的态度,但其核心是君主专制。为了确保自己的绝对君主专制,他以建立在自然法基础上的马基雅维里的国家理由为依据,对岛上的臣民进行了武装震慑、策略手段和宗教皈依等统治方式。鲁滨逊离开后,荒岛上的居民处在人人平等的自然状态,因此,建立了一个以"同意"为基础,以西班牙船长为总督的民主政治体制。鲁滨逊最终放弃荒岛,远走中国等地寻求贸易,表明笛福更倾向基于平等和自由贸易的民主政治。有鉴于此,不难理解鲁滨逊对于闭关锁国的中国的批评。
[Abstract]:Based on the natural law, Robinson occupied the desert island and took different attitudes to the people who came to the desert island, but the core of the monarchy was autocratic monarchy. In order to ensure his absolute monarchy, he established the rule of Machiavel on the basis of natural law, and carried out armed deterrence, strategy and religious conversion. After Robinson left, the inhabitants of the desert island were in the equal state of equality. Therefore, a democratic political system based on "consent" and a captain of Spain was established. Robinson finally gave up the desert island and went away from China to seek trade, indicating that Defoe was more inclined to be based on democracy on the basis of equality and free trade. In view of this, it is not difficult to understand Robinson for the seclusion of the China criticism.
【作者单位】：湖北大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“丹尼尔·笛福的决疑论政治思想研究”【项目批号:16BWW046】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I561.074
【正文快照】： 《鲁滨逊漂流记》这部历久弥新的名著被不同的批评家从不同的角度进行过分析,但从政治的角度对该作品进行分析的较少。伊恩·瓦特在《小说的兴起》中将小说看做个人主义的产物,没有关注《鲁滨逊漂流记》对公共事务的探讨。读者往往将小说与个人生活和社会秩序相联系,通常很难

【相似文献】