金裕贞和蔡万植短篇小说中反讽手法比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 14:35

本文选题：金裕贞 + 蔡万植　；参考：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：金裕贞和蔡万植是韩国20世纪三十年代重要的小说家。众所周知,20世纪30年代,日本强化了对韩国的殖民地围堵政策。在这种暗淡的现实社会中,韩国的作家们用各自的方式寻找着拯救韩国文学的出路。作为韩国30年代重要的小说家,金裕贞和蔡万植并没有回避当时的社会现实,他们选择了委婉的反讽手法,揭露了当时穷乏的社会生活景象。由于两人有着不同人生经历,他们作品中表现出来的反讽手法也有呈现出了不同。反讽,是一种带有讽刺意味的修辞手法,单纯从字面上不能了解其真正要表达的事物,而事实上其原本的意义正好是字面上所能理解的意涵的相反,通常要从上下文及语境来了解其用意。在研究修辞手法时应与作品文本分析相结合。本文选择了金裕贞和蔡万植具有代表性的短篇小说作为基础文本,通过作品中的人物以及他们对待现实的态度,分析两位作家在反讽手法运用及现实意识上的不同。本文将第2章分为三个部分。首先,从社会环境及作家生活经历两个方面探究了两位作家选择反讽手法的原因。在日本帝国主义的高压政策下,金裕贞和蔡万植面对现实生活中的病痛与穷乏、不遇与不幸,反讽的表现手法是他们唯一的抵抗方式。其次,分别分析了金裕贞和蔡万植的作品。金裕贞将无知蠢笨的人作为小说的主人公,讲述了他们在贫困又不幸的现实中悲惨的经历,引发了读者的同情之心;蔡万植则通过殖民地社会中知识分子所经历的挫折,表达了自己对现实社会的否定态度。最后,总结了前一部分所分析的作品的异同点,从而比较了金裕贞与蔡万植在韩国文学史意义上的不同。金裕贞作品中的人物主要是无知且愚钝的“傻瓜”形象,他们面对不合理的现实没有任何反抗,反而采取了更加消极的态度;而蔡万植作品中的人物大多是有一定知识的人,他们用自己的方式反抗着现实社会,表现出好不妥协的一面。
[Abstract]:Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih were important Korean novelists in the 1930 s. It is well known that in the 1930 s, Japan strengthened its colonial siege of South Korea. In this bleak society, Korean writers are looking for ways to save Korean literature in their own ways. As an important novelist in the 1930s, Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih did not shy away from the social reality at that time. They chose euphemistic irony and exposed the poor social life scene at that time. Because of their different life experiences, the irony in their works is different. Irony is a rhetorical device with a sarcastic connotation that simply does not understand what it is intended to express, but in fact its original meaning is exactly the opposite of what is literally understood. It is usually understood in context and context. In the study of rhetorical devices, it should be combined with the text analysis of the works. This paper chooses Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi's representative short stories as the basic text. Through the characters in the works and their attitudes towards reality, this paper analyzes the differences in the use of irony and realistic consciousness between the two writers. Chapter 2 is divided into three parts. First of all, from the social environment and the writer's life experience, the author explores the reasons why the two writers choose irony. Under the high-pressure policy of Japanese imperialism, Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi face the illness and poverty in real life, not meet and unfortunate, irony is their only way of resistance. Secondly, it analyzes the works of Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi respectively. Jin Yuzhen takes the ignorant and stupid people as the protagonists of the novel, tells their tragic experiences in the poor and unfortunate reality, and arouses the sympathy of the readers, while Tsai Wan-shih experiences the setbacks experienced by the intellectuals in the colonial society. Expressed their negative attitude to the real society. Finally, the author summarizes the similarities and differences of the works analyzed in the previous part, and compares the significance of Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih in Korean literary history. The characters in Jin Yuzhen's works are mainly ignorant and dull images of "fools." instead of any resistance to unreasonable reality, they take a more passive attitude, while most of the characters in Cai Wanzhi's works are people with certain knowledge. They use their own way to resist the real society, showing good intransigence.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I312.607.4

【相似文献】