经济视野扩张、种群视野缺失与叙事政治阐释的盲视——詹姆逊叙事政治阐释学主符码评析之七

发布时间：2018-06-27 20:19

本文选题：叙事政治阐释 + 生产方式　；参考：《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》2016年03期

【摘要】：詹姆逊叙事政治阐释学的主符码是"总体性历史",而"总体性历史"的终极统摄性力量是"生产方式"。在詹姆逊的理论模式中,生产方式覆盖了从社会文化生产到政治体制生产到经济生产的所有层面。但从他大量的论文论著中可以看出,他特别强调经济生产方式在社会结构中的基础性地位,其理论还是潜在地存在着经济决定论的痕迹,但基于经济生产方式的分析在詹姆逊手上释放出前所未有的巨大解释力量。詹姆逊社会结构模式和生产理论最大的缺陷,就是完全无视种群生产方式在社会结构中的基础性地位,因此,其社会结构理论存在明显片面性。由于种群生产视野的缺失,导致他叙事政治阐释理论和实践中对种群生产与叙事活动内在关系的完全盲视,这是一个严重的缺憾。
[Abstract]:The main code of Jameson's narrative political hermeneutics is "total history", and the ultimate dominating force of "totality history" is "mode of production". In Jameson's theoretical model, the mode of production covers all levels from sociocultural production to political system production to economic production. However, it can be seen from his numerous papers that he particularly emphasizes the fundamental position of economic production in the social structure, and that his theory still has a trace of economic determinism. But the analysis based on the mode of economic production has unleashed an unprecedented power of explanation in Jameson's hands. The biggest defect of Jameson's social structure model and production theory is to completely ignore the basic position of the population production mode in the social structure, therefore, its social structure theory has obvious one-sidedness. Because of the lack of the visual field of population production, it is a serious defect that he completely blind the relationship between population production and narrative activities in his narrative political interpretation theory and practice.
【作者单位】：厦门大学嘉庚学院语言应用与叙事文化研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(10BZW004)
【分类号】：I106

【相似文献】