当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 现代文学论文 >

论荷尔德林悲剧思想中的“转向”

发布时间:2018-08-28 16:26
【摘要】:荷尔德林自1798年起开始尝试创作现代悲剧《恩培多克勒斯之死》,但最终这次创作被证明是不可能完成的。对他来说,有着辩证本质的悲剧不过是对表现为不可能的哲学思辨的比喻,因而这次戏剧创作的失败获得了一个"反形而上学"的意义,直接导致他在此后所写的《俄狄浦斯注释》和《安提戈涅注释》中修改早期在《论悲剧的含义》中对悲剧的定义,使得与诸神合而为一的"可怕"行为得以被认知和净化,而形而上学的思辨精神也得到了批判。此外,唯一能将神圣保存在纯粹中的办法不是如基督般去"模仿"神圣,而是实践"神圣的背弃"。荷尔德林从悲剧的角度对思辨理性进行了批判,这为德国唯心主义中自我意识的悖论找到了一条出路,其悲剧观对反思现代理性主义思潮也具有深远意义。
[Abstract]:Holdrin has tried to create Modern tragedy the death of Empedocles since 1798, but in the end this work proved impossible. To him, a tragedy with a dialectical essence is but a metaphor for philosophical speculation that is impossible, so the failure of this drama has acquired the meaning of "anti-metaphysics". As a direct result of his subsequent revision of the definition of tragedy in the Oedipus Notes and the Antigone Notes, the definition of tragedy in the early part of "on the meaning of tragedy" was made known and purified by the "terrible" act of being United with the gods. The speculative spirit of metaphysics has also been criticized. Moreover, the only way to preserve holiness in purity is not to "imitate" the divine, but to practice "holiness". Holdrin criticizes speculative reason from the perspective of tragedy, which finds a way out for the paradox of self-consciousness in German idealism.
【作者单位】: 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】:“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”(20720151278;20720161047)项目的阶段性成果
【分类号】:I516.073


本文编号:2209944

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2209944.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b7c32***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com