多余意义与文学史研究发展的新契机
发布时间：2018-09-11 12:25
【摘要】：文学文本在历史的演替中,可能会产生一系列不是作者设想,甚至也不是文本自身所包含的意义,它不是文本所固有的东西,因此称之为多余意义。本文分为三个方面:其一,指明多余意义的含义及其在文学史中可能体现的问题;其二,区分多余意义和文本本身所包含的剩余意义;其三,多余意义作为文学史论说的材料,即文学史不只是要论说文学的过去,也要论说文学的发展乃至在当今视野下的景观,这种关于多余意义的研讨可能成为文学史新的发见的契机。最后,多余意义作为文学史过程中生成的产物,需要我们积极地去发现而不是被动地等待。
[Abstract]:In the historical succession of literary texts, there may be a series of meanings which are not conceived by the author, or even contained by the text itself. They are not inherent in the text, so they are called redundant meanings. Thirdly, redundant meaning is regarded as the material of literary history, that is, literary history is not only about the past of literature, but also about the development of literature and even the landscape in today's vision. This discussion on redundant meaning may become a new opportunity for literary history. As a product of the process of literary history, redundant meaning needs us to discover actively rather than wait passively.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学文学院;
【分类号】：I109
，
本文编号：2236679
[Abstract]:In the historical succession of literary texts, there may be a series of meanings which are not conceived by the author, or even contained by the text itself. They are not inherent in the text, so they are called redundant meanings. Thirdly, redundant meaning is regarded as the material of literary history, that is, literary history is not only about the past of literature, but also about the development of literature and even the landscape in today's vision. This discussion on redundant meaning may become a new opportunity for literary history. As a product of the process of literary history, redundant meaning needs us to discover actively rather than wait passively.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学文学院;
【分类号】：I109
，
本文编号：2236679
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2236679.html
