中西文论对话的主体性建基
发布时间：2018-09-14 15:16
【摘要】：文论危机或者失语是在1980年代末期就已经提出、并迅速获得基本共识,此后一直是被反复讨论的热点话题,为了摆脱由于对西方话语的习惯性依赖所造成的能指浮泛与所指错位,恢复文论研究的阐释能效,学界提出了返回现实、转换古代思想资源等途径,但却始终未能取得有效的成果。所以如此,乃在于主体性不足或者空缺。在生命感知、文化浸润与现实关注的场域中重建话语的主体性,才可能获得面对西方、古代以及现实的第一人称视角,致力于理论的吸收与创造。
[Abstract]:The crisis of literary theory or aphasia was raised in the late 1980s and quickly gained a basic consensus. Since then, it has been a hot topic of repeated discussion. In order to get rid of the deviation of signifier and signified caused by the habitual dependence on western discourse, and to restore the energy efficiency of literary theory research, the academic circles put forward some ways to return to reality and to transform ancient ideological resources. However, it has never been able to achieve effective results. So, it lies in the lack of subjectivity or vacancy. Only by reconstructing the subjectivity of discourse in the field of life perception, cultural infiltration and reality attention can we gain the first person perspective in the face of the West, ancient times and reality, and devote ourselves to the absorption and creation of theory.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“20世纪西方文论中的中国问题”(16ZDA194)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I106
本文编号：2243084
[Abstract]:The crisis of literary theory or aphasia was raised in the late 1980s and quickly gained a basic consensus. Since then, it has been a hot topic of repeated discussion. In order to get rid of the deviation of signifier and signified caused by the habitual dependence on western discourse, and to restore the energy efficiency of literary theory research, the academic circles put forward some ways to return to reality and to transform ancient ideological resources. However, it has never been able to achieve effective results. So, it lies in the lack of subjectivity or vacancy. Only by reconstructing the subjectivity of discourse in the field of life perception, cultural infiltration and reality attention can we gain the first person perspective in the face of the West, ancient times and reality, and devote ourselves to the absorption and creation of theory.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“20世纪西方文论中的中国问题”(16ZDA194)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I106
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 李家骧;;中西文论的运用比例观念[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
2 李蓓;中西文论互比互识的三个层面[J];中国比较文学;1996年04期
3 运丽君;;14——17世纪的中西文论比较[J];语文学刊;2006年10期
4 叶嘉莹;中西文论视域中的“赋、比、兴”[J];河北学刊;2004年03期
5 马建智;跨文明的中西文论整合[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年03期
6 徐达;;中西文论比较研究探微[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);1987年01期
7 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 吴玲;情动辞发[D];西南交通大学;2007年
，本文编号：2243084
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2243084.html
