韩国现代文学中的南京叙事研究(1919-1945)
[Abstract]:Taking the poems, prose, novels and dramas published in the Korean modern media as the research object, this paper mainly studies the literary cognition of the historical tradition and modern transformation of Nanjing by the modern Korean writers. It also analyzes the different images of Nanjing in Korean literature before and after the War of Resistance against Japan broke out. The purpose of this paper is to correctly explain the contradiction and complexity of the cognition of Korean writer Nanjing under the historical background of Japanese colonization, and on this basis to re-examine the Chinese image and its significance in Korean modern literature. Although Chinese and Korean scholars have begun to pay attention to the Chinese and Chinese images in modern Korean literature, most of the studies focus on the integrity of the Chinese image, while the study on the image of some regions and cities is confined to the Northeast region and Shanghai, Beijing. The study of the image of Nanjing in modern Korean literature will be an important supplement to the study of Chinese image. On the one hand, it will help to broaden the perspective of the study. On the other hand, the reconstruction of Korean national identity under Japanese colonial rule from the angle of ideology is helpful to grasp the co-construction relationship between Korean's Chinese cognition and their internal identity construction from the frame of modernity. First of all, this paper focuses on Nanjing in Korean modern literature from two aspects: traditional culture and modern civilization. For traditional culture, on the one hand, Korean writers express their feelings of homecoming by visiting historic sites; on the other hand, Korean writers express their nostalgia and yearning for traditional Oriental civilization by feeling the decline of empires in the past. As a result, Nanjing was seen as a utopia that could temporarily escape the realities of its native colony. In terms of modern civilization, the construction of the new capital shows the determination of connecting Nanjing with the modern western civilization, and the construction project, which can be seen everywhere, embodies a new face. South Korean writers also show two attitudes, one is support, the other is a new beginning of rejuvenating China, the other is scepticism about the ability of the national government and the nature of the Chinese people. Both attitudes reflect the yearning for modern civilization. Secondly, this paper is divided into two stages before and after the War of Resistance against Japan to examine the writing of Nanjing in modern Korean literature. Before the Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1937, Nanjing, as the new capital of the National Government, was also the symbol of a new China. It is an important window for Koreans to understand China from a political point of view, and an opportunity for Koreans colonized by Japan to observe the process of modernization of the independent nation. After the fall of Nanjing in 1937, Japan carried out the so-called post-war reconstruction work. And support Wang Jingwei's puppet regime. The Korean writers in this period were more obviously influenced by the ideology of Japanese colonialism, and Nanjing in his works became a city full of vitality, which was attributed to the revival and construction of Japan in Nanjing. In the final analysis, the Korean writers' praise or demotion to Nanjing is the embodiment of a kind of latent ideology, and the ultimate purpose is to confirm their own value through Nanjing. To sum up, the Korean writers' writing of Nanjing is embodied in the imagination of history and the critique of reality, showing a complex and contradictory variety of cognition, which is also a microcosm of the complex situation in East Asia at that time. At the same time, it contains the knowledge of Korean people through history and reality.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I312.606
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;现代文学观的发生与形成[J];当代作家评论;2000年05期
2 朱寿桐;中国现代文学学术规范笔谈[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);2000年04期
3 张莉;多向的思维 新颖的理论─—《评中日现代文学比较论》[J];烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年01期
4 杨昌江;中国现代文学的总主题[J];培训与研究(湖北教育学院学报);2001年06期
5 ;现代文学的合理性意义[J];文艺理论研究;2002年02期
6 汪应果;关于中国现代文学观念的几点思考[J];文艺争鸣;2002年04期
7 卢学英;现代文学教学改革探析[J];江西社会科学;2003年07期
8 徐志伟;“中国现代文学专家学术座谈会”综述[J];文学评论;2003年06期
9 季玢;“中国现代文学学术史”建构刍议[J];连云港师范高等专科学校学报;2003年01期
10 本刊编辑部;关于设立“中国现代文学关键词”栏目的说明[J];信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 邱雪松;;20世纪初叶现代文学与现代出版的关系演变考[A];中国现代文学研究会第十届年会论文摘要汇编[C];2010年
2 王文英;;一个城市与文学的关系——上海的现代文学(提纲)[A];都市文化——文学学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
3 李圣;;在高校《现代文学》教学改革中如何运用多媒体课件[A];“高教强省”探索与实践——高教科研2008[C];2009年
4 王卫平;;现代文学经典的厘定与当代文化建设[A];中国现代文学研究会第十届年会论文摘要汇编[C];2010年
5 陈伟华;;论现代文学经典作品的当代大学教学——以《阿Q正传》为例[A];中国现代文学研究会第十届年会论文摘要汇编[C];2010年
6 哈迎飞;;中国现代文学经典阐释与当代语文教学[A];中国现代文学研究会第十届年会论文摘要汇编[C];2010年
7 旷新年;;现代文学发生中的现代性问题[A];《中国现代文学研究丛刊》30年精编:文学史研究·史料研究卷(史料研究卷)[C];2009年
8 朱金顺;;辑佚·版本·“全集不全”——读“中国现代文学的文献问题座谈会”论文随想[A];《中国现代文学研究丛刊》30年精编:文学史研究·史料研究卷(文学史研究卷)[C];2009年
9 王润龙;;从中国现代文学看文艺与政治的关系[A];《毛泽东文艺思想研究》第九辑暨全国毛泽东文艺思想研究会1993年年会论文集[C];1993年
10 杨洪承;;上海与中国现代文学社群的关系考[A];都市文化——文学学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 余三定;“中国现代文学”学科的建构[N];文艺报;2012年
2 袁盛勇;“中国现代文学”:命定会受到质疑[N];社会科学报;2003年
3 杨阳 王泽龙;评李蓉《中国现代文学的身体阐释》[N];光明日报;2010年
4 刘保昌 湖北省社会科学院文学研究所;反思“现代文学与传统文化”[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
5 祝晓风;2005,见证文学研究“史料年”[N];中华读书报;2005年
6 张清芳;日本现代文学如何摆脱困境?[N];中国图书商报;2008年
7 易晖 中国现代文学馆;发掘中国现代文学新史料[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
8 金惠俊 韩国釜山大学教授;中国现代文学的韩文翻译[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
9 张岩 辽宁大学历史学院;现代文学中的神话书写[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
10 颜同林 贵州师范大学文学院;中国现代文学中的方言入诗[N];中国社会科学报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 黄林非;理性话语与中国现代文学的理性精神[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
2 高群;清末民初教育制度的变革与现代文学的建构[D];苏州大学;2007年
3 赖斯捷;近现代湖南报刊与现代文学[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
4 雷启立;印刷现代性与中国现代文学的发生[D];华东师范大学;2008年
5 周海波;现代传媒视野中的中国现代文学[D];山东师范大学;2004年
6 崔一;韩国现代文学中的中国形象研究[D];延边大学;2002年
7 申宜f,
本文编号:2274824
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2274824.html