巴赫金审美活动主体“非复调”对话关系视角下的《防守》解析

发布时间：2018-11-19 20:30

【摘要】：评论界普遍认为巴赫金和纳博科夫的文艺美学思想存在一定差异性。巴赫金对复调小说推崇备至,而纳博科夫则认定作者的绝对权威。然而,巴赫金对于审美活动的"他者"与"我",即作者和主人公的对话模式分析是动态而多元的。如果说巴赫金在《陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题》中侧重于作者和主人公的平等对话关系,那么在《审美活动中的作者和主人公》中则强调了作者对主人公和作品整体性的超视建构,彰显了审美主体间的非平等、"非复调"关系。而在纳博科夫声明作者始终在场的同时,自然也指明了作者与主人公的强弱对立。可以说,就探讨审美活动主体关系性这一问题,巴赫金与纳博科夫的思想是共性中存在差异,差异中又存在共性。鉴于此,本文试图以巴赫金审美主体非平等对话视角来分析纳博科夫小说《防守》中作者与主人公的博弈关系,以期拓展对巴赫金理论和纳博科夫创作的阐释空间。
[Abstract]:Critics generally think that there are some differences between Bakhtin and Nabokov's literary aesthetics. Bakhtin admires polyphonic novels, while Nabokov affirms the author's absolute authority. However, Bakhtin's analysis of the "other" and "I" in aesthetic activities, that is, the dialogue mode between the author and the protagonist, is dynamic and multivariate. If Bakhtin focuses on the equal dialogue between the author and the protagonist in Dostoevsky's Poetics, The author and the protagonist in Aesthetic activities emphasize the author's overlooking construction of the protagonist and the work as a whole, which reveals the unequal and "non-polyphonic" relationship between the aesthetic subjects. While Nabokov's statement that the author was always present, nature also pointed out the strength and weakness of the author and the protagonist. It can be said that Bakhtin and Nabokov have differences in generality and there are commonalities in the discussion of the relationship between aesthetic activity subjects. In view of this, this paper attempts to analyze the game relationship between the author and the protagonist in Nabokov's novel "Defense" from the perspective of unequal dialogue between the aesthetic subject of Bakhtin and his works in order to expand the interpretation space of Bakhtin's theory and Nabokov's creation.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学外国语学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“东正教与俄罗斯文学”子项目“东正教与俄罗斯文学中的国家形象构建”(项目编号:15ZDB092) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(优势学科代码:20110101) 2013年南京师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I712.074

【相似文献】