比较文学究竟是跨国的还是跨民族的
发布时间：2018-11-22 07:28
【摘要】：自比较文学产生以来,法、美学派一直坚持跨国研究,陈淳、刘象愚否定了跨国研究之后,提出了比较文学的跨民族研究。跨民族研究的提出,不但没有厘清比较文学的研究对象,反而使得比较文学研究陷入了更大的困惑之中。比较文学是跨国的还是跨民族的,长期以来一直是比较文学界争议较大的一个话题,厘清它们之间的关系是比较文学研究者的当务之急。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of comparative literature, the school of law and the United States has always insisted on transnational studies. After Chen Chun and Liu Xiangyu denied the cross-national studies, they put forward the cross-national study of comparative literature. The proposal of cross-ethnic studies has not only failed to clarify the objects of comparative literature, but also led to greater confusion in the study of comparative literature. It has long been a controversial topic in the field of comparative literature that comparative literature is transnational or inter-national. It is urgent for researchers to clarify the relationship between them.
【作者单位】： 四川大学文学与新闻学院;西北民族大学文学院;
【分类号】：I106
本文编号：2348504
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of comparative literature, the school of law and the United States has always insisted on transnational studies. After Chen Chun and Liu Xiangyu denied the cross-national studies, they put forward the cross-national study of comparative literature. The proposal of cross-ethnic studies has not only failed to clarify the objects of comparative literature, but also led to greater confusion in the study of comparative literature. It has long been a controversial topic in the field of comparative literature that comparative literature is transnational or inter-national. It is urgent for researchers to clarify the relationship between them.
【作者单位】： 四川大学文学与新闻学院;西北民族大学文学院;
【分类号】：I106
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 ;少数民族文学作品简介[J];教学参考;1979年02期
2 李淑言;后现代时期的美国少数民族文学研究[J];国外文学;1993年04期
3 曾令富;;简论后工业时代美国少数民族文学的崛起[J];四川教育学院学报;2006年01期
4 渠红丽;;从文化多元化角度看美国少数民族文学的崛起[J];前沿;2013年02期
5 吴重阳;;春雨后,又是一番新绿——一九八三年少数民族短篇小说概评[J];民族文学;1984年06期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘伟;文化翻译视野下的“少数民族文学”[D];南开大学;2010年
，本文编号：2348504
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2348504.html
