《秘密》的开篇场景:沉默和言说
发布时间：2019-05-14 01:36
【摘要】：彼得拉克在《秘密》的开篇场景中设置了很多非常有趣但同时又令人疑惑不解的文本时刻。第一点也是其中最为奇异的一点,是开篇场景从头到尾弗朗西斯科和圣奥古斯丁都没有和对方说过一句话:真理女神毫无缘由地突然说话,恰好阻碍了弗朗西斯科和圣奥古斯丁在开篇第一次也是唯一一次的对话机会。第二点,真理女神身份的真正寓意到底是什么?很多学者将她的文本源头归结到波埃修斯的"哲学女神",但本文通过文本比较却发现彼得拉克的真理女神却是圣奥古斯丁口中所谴责的"荣耀"。第三点,圣奥古斯丁为何在真理女神对自己说话前,一直出奇地保持着沉默?沉默抑或是言说?它们不仅仅是修辞行为,同时也体现了彼得拉克在面对"出世的隐逸生活"和"入世的荣耀"间的艰难选择。彼得拉克的犹豫不定正是他思想复杂性的来源:这种情感体现了他和中世纪经院哲学、神学之间千丝万缕的联系和断裂。沉默和言说之间的对抗,以及沉默的哲学、道德意义成为解释在《秘密》开篇文本中这几个问题的关键点。
[Abstract]:Peter Luck sets a lot of very interesting but puzzling text moments in the opening scene of Secret. The first and most bizarre of them was that Francisco and St. Augustine did not say a word to each other from beginning to end: the goddess of truth suddenly spoke for no reason. It just hinders Francesco and St. Augustine's first and only opportunity to talk at the beginning. Second, what is the true implication of the identity of the goddess of truth? Many scholars attribute the source of her text to Portheus's "goddess of philosophy", but through the comparison of the text, this paper finds that Peter Lak's goddess of truth is the "glory" condemned by St. Augustine. Third, why did St. Augustine keep surprisingly silent until the goddess of truth spoke to herself? Silence or words? They are not only rhetorical acts, but also reflect Peter Luck's difficult choice in the face of "seclusion of birth" and "glory of China's entry into the WTO". Petrarch's hesitation is the source of his ideological complexity: this emotion reflects his inextricably linked and broken relationship with medieval Confucian philosophy and theology. The confrontation between silence and speech, as well as the philosophy of silence, the moral meaning has become the key point to explain these problems in the opening text of Secret.
【作者单位】： 同济大学人文学院;帕多瓦大学文学与语言学学院;
【分类号】：I546.075
本文编号：2476338
[Abstract]:Peter Luck sets a lot of very interesting but puzzling text moments in the opening scene of Secret. The first and most bizarre of them was that Francisco and St. Augustine did not say a word to each other from beginning to end: the goddess of truth suddenly spoke for no reason. It just hinders Francesco and St. Augustine's first and only opportunity to talk at the beginning. Second, what is the true implication of the identity of the goddess of truth? Many scholars attribute the source of her text to Portheus's "goddess of philosophy", but through the comparison of the text, this paper finds that Peter Lak's goddess of truth is the "glory" condemned by St. Augustine. Third, why did St. Augustine keep surprisingly silent until the goddess of truth spoke to herself? Silence or words? They are not only rhetorical acts, but also reflect Peter Luck's difficult choice in the face of "seclusion of birth" and "glory of China's entry into the WTO". Petrarch's hesitation is the source of his ideological complexity: this emotion reflects his inextricably linked and broken relationship with medieval Confucian philosophy and theology. The confrontation between silence and speech, as well as the philosophy of silence, the moral meaning has become the key point to explain these problems in the opening text of Secret.
【作者单位】： 同济大学人文学院;帕多瓦大学文学与语言学学院;
【分类号】：I546.075
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 李兴华;;慰藉:《雅歌》中彼得拉克爱情的指向[J];铜陵职业技术学院学报;2008年04期
2 辛旭;彼得拉克的读书与交游:早期人文主义的知识语境和社会资源[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
3 菲戈;;彼得拉克,回不去的时代[J];世界;2006年06期
4 梁丽;申霖;;关于彼得拉克体与莎士比亚体的分析[J];时代文学(理论学术版);2007年01期
5 王雪飞;;从“翡冷翠”到“彼得拉克的阿夸”[J];散文;1997年05期
6 任诚刚;;浅释莎士比亚十四行诗的“起、承、转、合”[J];云南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
7 凌雪;一篇画龙点睛的故事——评《十日谈》第四天故事一[J];昭乌达蒙族师专学报(哲学社会科学版);1982年00期
8 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 辛旭;弗朗切斯科·彼得拉克：知识史与社会史视角的一项研究[D];四川大学;2002年
，本文编号：2476338
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2476338.html
