英语学界社交媒体“隐私悖论”研究

发布时间：2018-07-25 18:21

【摘要】：近年来,域外英文学术期刊中比较集中地发表了一批研究"隐私悖论"问题的成果,涉及新闻传播学、法学、情报学、信息科学等学科。通过对这些研究成果的梳理发现,它们主要围绕以下三个主题开展论述:"隐私悖论"的概念界定;"隐私悖论"的成因分析;网络用户应对"隐私悖论"困境的策略。这些研究成果表明,"隐私悖论"现象普遍存在于用户对社交网站的使用之中;自我披露带来的实际益处是造成这一悖论的主因;对这一悖论的应对更多地需要网络用户自觉主动的隐私保护行为。"隐私悖论"现象说明,在网络时代,"个人信息不得非法公开"的被动隐私含义难以成立,信息公开与否已经不能成为判断隐私的标准。对信息的主动控制,尤其是控制谁能看到自我披露的信息已经成为隐私含义的核心,用户对已经披露公开的信息依然具有合理的隐私期待。
[Abstract]:In recent years, a number of researches on "privacy paradox" have been published in overseas English academic journals, involving the subjects of news communication, law, information science, information science and so on. Through combing these research results, we find that they mainly focus on the following three themes: definition of the concept of "privacy paradox"; analysis of the causes of "privacy paradox"; strategies for network users to deal with the dilemma of "privacy paradox". These results show that the phenomenon of "privacy paradox" generally exists in the use of social networking sites by users, and the actual benefits of self-disclosure are the main cause of this paradox. The response to this paradox requires more active privacy protection on the part of network users. " The phenomenon of "privacy paradox" shows that in the network age, the passive meaning of "no illegal disclosure of personal information" is difficult to establish, and whether or not information disclosure can no longer be the standard of judging privacy. The active control of information, especially the control of who can see the self-disclosure of information, has become the core of the meaning of privacy. Users still have reasonable privacy expectations for the information that has been disclosed.
【作者单位】：浙江工业大学人文学院;华南理工大学新闻与传播学院;华南理工大学传播法与传播伦理研究中心;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金青年项目“我国法律引入‘被遗忘权’的可行性研究”(项目编号:16CXW023)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：G206

【相似文献】