列维纳斯为他者伦理学视野下的库切文本《福》之研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 05:07

本文关键词：列维纳斯为他者伦理学视野下的库切文本《福》之研究　出处：《广东外语外贸大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本论文对后殖民时代背景下的殖民者/被殖民者,女/男,作者/角色三对二元对立的伦理关系进行了为他者伦理方面的探讨。通过细致的文本阅读,作者力图证明在南非的后殖民背景下,小说家库切透过小说《福》对上述三对伦理关系进行了相关阐释并且其伦理主张与列维纳斯的为他者伦理学相吻合,也就是后殖民时代中自我对他者负有不可推卸的责任,自我必须无条件尊重他者的选择和存在。库切认为,现代文明对世界的了解和探索都是建立在对事物的本体论认知上。自我通过对他者的同化获取知识,也即是消灭他者的他性并把他们纳入自我的认知系统当中。因此,为了抵制这种具有杀戮性质的认知倾向,还世界以真正的和平,库切认为通过星期五的沉默和身体符号,克鲁索鬼魂的萦扰,苏珊的历史再叙述质疑西方经典,还他者以声音,提倡一种对他者绝对负责的伦理观具有迫切的现实意义。本文总共包括五个章节。第一章重点介绍了库切及其作品《福》,相关的文献综述,论文研究的理论框架和中心论点。第二章主要针对殖民系统中语言与同者的合谋和他者对压迫的反抗对殖民关系进行解读。通过被殖民者的反抗,库切质疑了西方话语中对他者的殖民压迫,提倡以尊重他者的他性为前提的深入历史真相的伦理审视。第三章重点阐释了女/男二元对立关系。库切对两性关系的解构结果表明,女性在两性关系中上升到主导地位并且压迫男性他者。库切认为两性之间的这种互相压迫是由背后的本体论认知思维方式决定的,因此他通过男性他者鬼魂的萦扰暗示人们提倡一种对他者绝对负责的伦理观的重要性。第四章讨论了作者和角色之间的写作伦理。通过给角色以自由叙述历史的声音,库切针对西方经典中对他者的无视和写作的本身的含混性进行了聚焦和探讨,从而质疑了西方经典对历史反映的真实性和作家写作的权威性。第五章总结了库切在以上三对二元对立关系中所表现出来的伦理态度,并且认为库切通过模糊化的写作策略,表达了他的为他者的伦理主张。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the ethical relationship of duality between colonizers / colonizers, women / men, and writers / characters in the context of the post-colonial era. The author tries to prove that in the post-colonial background of South Africa, novelist Coetzee interprets these three pairs of ethical relationships through the novel "bliss", and his ethical claims coincide with Levinas' ethics of the other. That is, in the post-colonial era, the ego has an unshirkable responsibility to the other, and the ego must unconditionally respect the choice and existence of the other. Modern civilization's understanding and exploration of the world are based on the ontological cognition of things. Self acquires knowledge through assimilation of others. That is, to eliminate the otherness and to incorporate them into the ego's cognitive system. Therefore, in order to resist this tendency of killing, the world is truly at peace. Kuche believes that through Friday's silence and body symbols, Crusoe's ghost haunts, Susan's historical narration questions the Western classics, and returns his voice to the others. It is of urgent practical significance to advocate an ethical view of absolute responsibility to the other. This paper consists of five chapters. The first chapter focuses on the introduction of Kuche and his works, the related literature review. The second chapter mainly focuses on the collusion between language and the same person in the colonial system and the resistance of the other to oppression. The second chapter interprets the colonial relationship through the resistance of the colonized. Kuche questioned the colonial oppression of the other in Western discourse. The third chapter focuses on the explanation of the duality between women and men. Kuche's deconstruction of gender relations shows that the relationship between the two sexes is deconstructed. Women rise to the dominant position in the gender relationship and oppress the other of the male. Kuche believes that the oppression between the two sexes is determined by the ontological cognitive thinking behind it. So he hinted at the importance of promoting an ethic of absolute responsibility to the other through the haunting of the ghost of the other. Chapter 4th discusses the ethics of writing between the author and the character. Sound. Kuche focuses on the neglect of the other and the ambiguity of his writing in the western classics. In order to question the authenticity of the Western classics to the historical reflection and the authoritativeness of the writer's writing, chapter 5th summarizes the ethical attitude of Kuche in the above three pairs of dualistic opposites. Furthermore, Kucht expresses his ethical ideas of the other through his fuzzifying writing strategy.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I478.074

【参考文献】