中国大学生心理弹性现状及其特征的Meta分析

发布时间：2019-02-14 09:38

【摘要】：目的:系统评价中国大学生的心理弹性总体情况及其特征差异,为规范心理弹性的研究方法提供依据。方法:计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBMdisc)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、相关期刊论文(CNKI)、万方数据库(Wanfang)、PubMed和Embase数据库中截至2013年9月12日发表的文献,纳入有关大学生心理弹性现状的横断面研究。2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、质量评价和资料提取,而后交叉核对,若有分歧,讨论解决。采用RevMan 5.1进行Meta分析,分析不同性别、年级、专业、居住地和是否为独生子女的大学生的心理弹性得分差异。结果:总共纳入31篇文献共计19 285名大学生。大学生的心理弹性处于良好水平。男生的心理弹性得分略高于女生[OR(95%CI):0.11(0.03,0.19),P0.05],大一学生的心理弹性得分高于大四学生[OR(95%CI):0.19(0.09,0.30),P0.05],理工医科类专业学生的心理弹性得分高于文科类专业的学生[OR(95%CI):-0.13(-0.20,-0.06),P0.05],城市学生、非独生子女的心理弹性得分分别高于农村学生[OR(95%CI):0.12(0.02,0.21),P0.05]和独生子女[OR(95%CI):-0.09(-0.17,0.00),P0.05]。结论:国内大学生群体的心理弹性存在差异。
[Abstract]:Objective: to systematically evaluate the general situation and characteristics of Chinese college students' psychological resilience, and to provide the basis for standardizing the research methods of psychological resilience. Methods: to retrieve Chinese biomedical literature database (CBMdisc), Weipu Chinese sci-tech journal database (VIP), Chinese periodical full-text database (CNKI), Wanfang database (Wanfang), The literature published in the databases of PubMed and Embase as of September 12, 2013, included cross-sectional studies on the current status of college students' psychological resilience. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction, then cross-checked, if there were differences. Discuss the solution. Meta analysis was carried out with RevMan 5.1 to analyze the differences in scores of resilience of college students with different gender, grade, specialty, residence and whether they were only children. Results: a total of 19 285 college students were included in 31 articles. The psychological flexibility of college students is at a good level. The scores of resilience of male students were slightly higher than that of female students [OR (95%CI): 0.11 (0.03 卤0.19), P0.05]. The scores of mental resilience of freshmen were higher than those of senior students [OR (95%CI): 0.19 (0.09 卤0.30)]. The scores of resilience of students majoring in science and technology medicine were higher than those of students majoring in liberal arts [OR (95%CI): -0.13 (-0.20- 0.06), P0.05]. The scores of resilience of non-only children were higher than those of rural students [OR (95%CI): 0.12 (0.020.21), P0.05] and only children [OR (95%CI): -0.09 (-0.170.00), P0.05]. Conclusion: there are differences in psychological resilience of college students in China.
【作者单位】：重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院妇幼保健与儿少卫生教研室;
【基金】：重庆市教委科研基金资助课题(KJ120309)
【分类号】：R395

【参考文献】