血清炎症因子水平在血流感染性疾病中的表达及与病原菌、病情程度及预后的相关性研究
本文选题:炎症因子 + 血流感染 ; 参考:《中国现代医学杂志》2017年21期
【摘要】:目的探讨血清炎症因子表达水平在血流感染性疾病中与病原菌、病情程度及预后的相关性。方法采用回顾性分析2015年1月-2016年5月该院收治的97例血流感染性疾病患者作为研究对象,根据患者病情、病原菌种类及治疗效果等来分析血清炎性因子降钙素原(PCT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)、白细胞数(WBC)及肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的表达水平在血流感染性疾病中的变化。结果血培养阳性的血流感染性疾病患者的血清炎症因子水平普遍高于血培养阴性患者的血清炎症因子水平,两者比较差异有统计学意义[PCT(t=170.410,P=0.000);IL-6(t=187.223,P=0.000);WBC(t=19.244,P=0.000);CRP(t=47.941,P=0.000);TN F-α(t=20.484,P=0.000)];血清炎症因子PCT、IL-6、WBC、CR P及TN F-α表达水平在革兰阴性菌组中最高,真菌组最低,三者间比较差异有统计学意义[PCT(F=5.367,P=0.019);IL-6(F=10.321,P=0.001);WBC(F=9.587,P=0.000);CR P(F=15.894,P=0.000);TN F-α(F=13.254,P=0.000)];各组血清炎症因子表达水平有差异,进一步两两比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗无效的血流感染性疾病患者的血清炎症因子表达水平均升高,治疗前后两者比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗好转的血流感染性疾病患者血清炎症因子表达水平均下降,治疗前后两者比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗好转组与治疗无效组血流感染性疾病患者的血清炎性因子表达水平在治疗前后差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论血清炎性因子表达水平与血流感染性疾病的严重程度、病原菌种类等有一定相关性,对治疗效果的早期判断有一定参考价值。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between the expression of serum inflammatory factors and pathogenic bacteria, severity and prognosis in blood stream infectious diseases.Methods from January 2015 to May 2016, 97 patients with blood flow infection were analyzed retrospectively.The types of pathogenic bacteria and the therapeutic effects were used to analyze the changes of the expression levels of serum inflammatory cytokines, such as the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines, such as CRP, IL-6, WBC- 伪 and TNF- 伪, in blood stream infectious diseases.Results the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines in patients with blood stream infectious diseases were higher than those in patients with negative blood culture.There were significant differences between the two groups [the expression levels of IL-6T 187.223P0.000 were the highest in the Gram-negative group and the lowest in the fungus group, and the expression levels of TN F- 伪 T20.484P0.000 were the lowest in the Gram-negative bacteria group, and the expression levels of TNF- 伪 and TNF- 伪 were the highest in the Gram-negative group, and the highest in the fungus group, and the highest in the Gram-negative group, and the highest in the fungus group, and the highest in the Gram-negative bacteria group, and the highest in the fungus group, and the highest in the Gram-negative bacteria group, and the highest in the fungus group, and the highest in the Gram-negative bacteria group, and the highest in the fungus group, and the highest in the Gram-negative bacteria group, and the highest in the fungus group.There were significant differences among the three groups [the expression level of IL-6FN 10.321 P0. 001WBCCU F9. 587P0. 000 was significantly different among the three groups], and the expression level of serum inflammatory factors was different among the three groups (P 0. 05 0. 000), and the level of serum inflammatory factors in each group was different, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0. 05 0. 0. 0. 05, P < 0. 05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the expression of serum inflammatory factors (P 0. 050), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the expression of TNF- 伪 F- 伪 F- 伪 F13. 254P0. 000 (P < 0. 05).The levels of serum inflammatory cytokines in patients with blood flow infectious diseases without effective treatment were significantly higher than those before and after treatment (P 0.05), and the expression levels of serum inflammatory factors in patients with improved blood flow infectious diseases were all lower than those before and after treatment, and there was no significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment.There was significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment (P 0.05).The expression of serum inflammatory factors in patients with blood flow infectious diseases was significantly different before and after treatment between the treatment group and the ineffective group (P 0.05).Conclusion the expression level of serum inflammatory factors is correlated with the severity of blood stream infectious diseases and the types of pathogenic bacteria, which has some reference value for the early judgement of therapeutic effect.
【作者单位】: 川北医学院附属医院感染科;首都医科大学;
【分类号】:R51
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁立新办;吴志华;;174种“新出现的疾病”研究发现新感染性疾病75%为人畜共患[J];中国社区医师(综合版);2005年21期
2 ;2007年度感染性疾病前10位新闻[J];中国感染控制杂志;2008年02期
3 施碧胜;袁正宏;;新发感染性疾病[J];微生物与感染;2008年01期
4 吕玮;;感染性疾病与发热[J];中国临床医生;2012年10期
5 樊成辉,王国俊,蔡雄,,刘志民;感染性疾病患者外周血单个核白细胞糖皮质激素受体改变的初步观察[J];中华传染病杂志;1994年04期
6 彭文伟;感染性疾病概述——感染性疾病(1)[J];新医学;1996年09期
7 杨永弘,沈叙庄;必须重视我国感染性疾病的研究[J];中华医学杂志;2001年15期
8 倪武,缪晓辉,王国俊,蔡雄,张瑞祺,王俊学,徐文胜;以不明原因发热为表现的感染性疾病50例临床分析[J];中华传染病杂志;2003年05期
9 翁心华;评分子生物学技术在感染性疾病检测中的评价[J];诊断学理论与实践;2004年01期
10 门司和彦;蔡国喜;陈华;张卓;;论现代社会面对感染性疾病的脆弱性[J];海峡预防医学杂志;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王燕燕;;中西医结合治疗感染性疾病的临床观察[A];中国中西医结合学会疡科分会第十一次全国学术交流会论文汇编[C];2003年
2 翁心华;;当前感染性疾病领域的一些热点与证据[A];第六届全国抗菌药物临床药理学术会议论文集[C];2006年
3 张华芳;应子勇;徐卫星;;感染性疾病对我国居民的危害性探讨[A];2008年浙江省感染病、肝病学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
4 陆一鸣;;感染性疾病的急诊实验室检查[A];第三届全国中西医结合重症医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
5 邵京;;边疆·道德·治理:以感染性疾病的控制为例[A];边疆发展中国论坛文集(2010)·发展理念卷[C];2010年
6 姜敏;;重视学习相关学科知识,合理治疗感染性疾病[A];江西省中西医结合学会呼吸病专业委员会首次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
7 吕萍;沈叙庄;;甘露糖结合凝集素与感染性疾病[A];第五次全国中青年检验医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
8 娄国强;;糖皮质激素在感染性疾病中的合理应用[A];第四届中国医师协会感染科医师大会暨传染病诊治高峰论坛、浙江省医学会肝病、感染病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
9 童明庆;;感染的证据[A];中华医学会第七次全国检验医学学术会议资料汇编[C];2008年
10 程丽萍;武华;;感染性疾病门诊建设管理现状调查分析[A];中国医院协会第十四届全国医院感染管理学术年会资料汇编[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 ;感染性疾病检测酝酿革命[N];中国医药报;2002年
2 天津市疾病预防控制中心主任医师 于长水;致病双因素 防治两途径[N];健康报;2007年
3 袁立新 吴志华;专家关注“新出现的感染性疾病”[N];中国医药报;2005年
4 李想;生物标志物助力感染性疾病临床诊疗[N];健康报;2014年
5 郭莲舫;心理障碍可致感染性疾病[N];卫生与生活报;2007年
6 袁立新 吴志华;新感染性疾病75%为人畜共患[N];大众卫生报;2006年
7 曹彬 王燕松;“感染病”不仅仅是“传染病”[N];健康报;2007年
8 本报记者 马艳红;联合检测PCT与IL—6可优化感染性疾病管理[N];中国医药报;2014年
9 记者 姚琳;广西第五期感染性疾病暨艾滋病专题学术研讨会在邕召开[N];广西日报;2005年
本文编号:1767844
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/chuanranbingxuelunwen/1767844.html