肝乐颗粒联合西药治疗慢性乙型肝炎(肝郁脾虚型)临床疗效观察
本文选题:慢乙肝 + 肝郁脾虚 ; 参考:《安徽中医药大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:1目的通过对肝乐颗粒联合恩替卡韦在肝郁脾虚型慢性乙型肝炎(Chronic Hepatitis B,CHB)临床治疗中作用研究,观察肝乐颗粒对慢乙肝患者临床症状及实验室指标的影响,评价肝乐颗粒的安全性及疗效,探讨肝乐颗粒在慢乙肝治疗中的可能作用机制,为中西医结合治疗慢乙肝提供新的治疗策略,为今后中医临床优化治疗慢乙肝提供更多的选择和科学依据。2方法选取60名慢性HBV感染肝郁脾虚证患者,随机分为对照组与治疗组,治疗组予恩替卡韦联合肝乐颗粒治疗,对照组仅予恩替卡韦治疗。分别于治疗前、治疗24w、治疗48w后观察两组患者中医症状、肝功能(ALT、AST、GGT、AKP、TBIL、ALB)、HBsAg、HBV DNA、肝纤四项(HA、LN、PⅢNP、CⅣ)及相关安全性指标。评估肝乐颗粒治疗慢乙肝的即时疗效。3结果3.1两组治疗后均可明显改善患者总体中医证候,且治疗48w后明显优于治疗24w后(P0.01);两组对比,治疗组对总体中医证候改善明显优于对照组(P0.05)。3.2治疗组治疗24w及48w后在所有症状改善均优于治疗前(P0.05);治疗24w后与治疗48w后比较,治疗48w后在胸胁胀痛、纳差、胃脘胀满、口淡、便溏、嗳气、乳房胀痛改善优于治疗24w后(P0.05),在善太息、乏力、舌脉方面无可比性,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。3.3对照组治疗24w后,除乳房胀痛外(P0.05),其他症状改善优于未治疗前(P0.05);治疗48w后所有症状改善均优于治疗前(P0.05);治疗24w后与治疗48w后比较,治疗48w后除舌脉外(P0.05),其他症状改善优于治疗24w后(P0.05)。3.4两组治疗24w后比较,治疗组在善太息、胃脘胀满、乏力、口淡、便溏改善方面优于对照组(P0.05),在胸胁胀痛、纳差、嗳气、乳房胀痛、舌脉方面无可比性(P0.05);治疗48w后比较,治疗组在善太息、胃脘胀满、乏力、口淡、便溏改善方面优于对照组(P0.05),在胸胁胀满、纳差、嗳气、乳房胀痛、舌脉方面无可比性(P0.05)。3.5治疗24w及48w后,治疗组总有效率明显优于对照组(P0.01)。3.6治疗组治疗24w及48w后在各个实验室指标方面改善均明显优于治疗前(P0.01);治疗24w与治疗48w后比较,治疗48w后ALB、HBsAg、肝纤四项方面改善优于治疗24w后(P0.05)。3.7对照组治疗24w及48w后在各个实验室指标方面均明显优于治疗前(P0.01);治疗24w与治疗48w后比较,治疗48w后HBsAg、肝纤四项改善优于治疗24w后(P0.05)。3.8两组治疗24w后比较,治疗组在肝纤四项方面改善优于对照组(P0.05);治疗48w后比较,治疗组在肝纤四项及TBIL方面改善优于对照组(P0.05)。3.9两组治疗前后安全性指标均在医学参考值范围内波动,治疗前后无明显变化,无统计学意义。4结论4.1在西医抗病毒的基础上联合肝乐颗粒治疗肝郁脾虚型慢性乙型肝炎疗效确切,肝乐颗粒可有效改善患者临床症状及中医证候。4.2肝乐颗粒可降低患者TBIL及肝纤四项指标,但具体作用机制仍需进一步探讨。4.3肝乐颗粒临床应用无明显不良反应,安全性良好。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the effect of Ganle granule combined with entecavir on the clinical treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients with chronic hepatitis B with liver stagnation and spleen deficiency, and to observe the effect of Ganle granule on the clinical symptoms and laboratory indexes of patients with chronic hepatitis B. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ganle granule, to explore the possible mechanism of Ganle granule in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, and to provide a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with integrated Chinese and western medicine. Methods 60 patients with chronic HBV infection with liver stagnation and spleen deficiency syndrome were randomly divided into control group and treatment group. The treatment group was treated with entecavir combined with Ganle granule. The control group was treated only with entecavir. Before treatment, 24 weeks after treatment and 48 weeks after treatment, the TCM symptoms, liver function of the two groups were observed, and the related safety indexes were measured. The liver function of the two groups was compared with that of the control group. The liver function of the two groups was compared with that of the control group. The liver function of the two groups was compared with that of the control group. The liver function of the two groups was compared with that of the control group. The liver function of the two groups was compared with that of the control group. Evaluation of the immediate curative effect of Ganle granule on chronic Hepatitis B results 3.1 after treatment, both groups could obviously improve the overall TCM syndromes of the patients, and after 48 weeks of treatment, it was significantly better than that after 24 weeks of treatment (P 0.01), and the two groups were compared with each other. The improvement of TCM syndromes in the treatment group was obviously better than that in the control group at 24 and 48 weeks after treatment, and after 24 weeks and 48 weeks, the symptoms in the treatment group were better than those in the control group after 24 weeks and 48 weeks respectively, and after 24 weeks and 48 weeks, the symptoms of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group, and after 48 weeks of treatment, the symptoms of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group. The improvement of loose stools, belching and breast distending pain was better than that of P0.05 after 24 weeks of treatment. The difference was not statistically significant after 24 weeks of treatment in the control group. With the exception of breast distending pain, the improvement of other symptoms was better than that before treatment (P 0.05); after 48 weeks of treatment, all symptoms were improved better than that before treatment (P 0.05); after 24 weeks of treatment, it was compared with that after 48 weeks of treatment. After 48 weeks of treatment, the improvement of other symptoms was better than that of the two groups after 24 weeks of treatment. The treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of good information, full stomach distension, fatigue, light mouth, loose stools, pain in chest and flank, anorexia, belching, and the improvement of loose stools was better than that of the control group in the improvement of P0.05, and the improvement of other symptoms was better than that of the control group after 24 weeks of treatment, and that of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. After 48 weeks of treatment, the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of good rest, full stomach distension, fatigue, light mouth, loose stool improvement, full chest distention, anorexia, belching, and breast distending pain. After 24 and 48 weeks of treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group after 24 weeks and 48 weeks of treatment, and the improvement of each laboratory index in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group at 24 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment, and at 24 weeks after treatment and 48 weeks after treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group. After 48 weeks of treatment, the improvement of four aspects of ALB HBsAg and liver fiber was better than that of 24 weeks after treatment and 48 weeks after treatment. The control group was significantly better than the control group in each laboratory index after 24 weeks and 48 weeks, and 24 weeks after treatment and 48 weeks after treatment, the improvement of liver fiber was significantly better than that of 24 weeks after treatment and 48 weeks after treatment. After 48 weeks of treatment, the four improvements of HBsAg and liver fiber were better than those of the two groups after 24 weeks of treatment (P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, respectively), and the improvement of liver fibrils in the treatment group was better than that in the control group, and after 48 weeks, the improvement was better in the treatment group. The improvement of liver fiber and TBIL in the treatment group was better than that in the control group (P 0.05N. 3.9). The safety indexes of the two groups fluctuated within the medical reference value before and after treatment, but there was no obvious change before and after treatment. Conclusion 4.1 on the basis of western medicine antiviral therapy combined with Ganle granule is effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with liver stagnation and spleen deficiency. Ganle granule can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients and TCM syndromes .4.2 Ganle granule can reduce the TBIL and liver fiber four indexes, but the specific mechanism still need to further explore the clinical application of .4.3 Ganle granule no obvious adverse reactions, good safety.
【学位授予单位】:安徽中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R512.62
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王改梅;肝乐宁治疗慢性乙型肝炎及肝硬化疗效观察[J];甘肃中医学院学报;1997年04期
2 李诚秀,李玲,罗俊,杨文秀,张小蕾,黄能慧,程明亮;汉丹肝乐的毒性研究[J];贵阳医学院学报;1999年02期
3 喻洪伟,张春梅;酒肝乐治疗酒精性肝病疗效观察[J];辽宁中医杂志;2003年04期
4 余海峰,林明增,陈霄峰,洪荣标;肝乐宁治疗肝硬变近期疗效分析[J];临床荟萃;1998年24期
5 刘志军;;脂肝乐降血脂20例临床观察[J];北方药学;2012年03期
6 苗芊,马洪波,金瑞;鑫肝乐治疗慢性乙型肝炎的近期疗效观察[J];北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版);2003年01期
7 唐树林;脂肝乐治疗脂肪肝100例[J];辽宁中医杂志;1997年04期
8 罗天永,吴君,刘琴,梁跃东,张影影;汉丹肝乐治疗慢性活动性肝炎肝纤维化分析[J];贵阳医学院学报;1999年02期
9 吴君;陆荫英;程明亮;丁一生;;汉丹肝乐对免疫性肝纤维化模型大鼠转化生长因子-β_1的影响[J];中国中西医结合杂志;2002年S1期
10 曹军;杨静;陈雷;杨志福;王磊;李华;崔佳;文爱东;;肝乐舒颗粒的质量标准研究[J];中国药师;2012年08期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 付荣泉;程明亮;;汉丹肝乐对猪血清免疫性肝纤维化肝中氧化及抗氧化的影响[A];第十二次全国中西医结合肝病学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
2 吴君;王一凡;闫超;刘芙蓉;;复方中药汉丹肝乐对砷暴露大鼠肝脏损伤的保护作用[A];全国第2届中西医结合传染病学术会议暨国家中医药管理局第1届传染病协作组会议论文汇编[C];2008年
3 吴君;罗天永;梁耀东;;复方中药汉丹肝乐抗肝纤维化的临床观察[A];第一次全国中西医结合传染病学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
4 王鑫;李勇;;十宝消ve方治疗慢性乙型肝炎后肝硬化(肝郁脾虚型)的临床观察研究[A];中华中医药学会脾胃病分会第二十四次全国脾胃病学术交流会论文汇编[C];2012年
5 陈志伟;邵雅斐;;60例肝郁脾虚型亚健康疲劳状态患者的可视化诊断[A];中华中医药学会亚健康分会换届选举暨“‘治未病’及亚健康防治论坛”论文集[C];2008年
6 陈志伟;邵雅斐;;肝郁脾虚型亚健康疲劳状态患者的可视化诊断[A];第三届中和亚健康论坛暨2009·亚健康产业展览会论文集[C];2009年
7 胡爱荣;丁一生;程明亮;;汉丹肝乐对免疫性肝纤维化大鼠HSCs增殖、活化及凋亡的影响[A];第十二次全国中西医结合肝病学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
8 甘爱萍;;肠泻安对肝郁脾虚型慢性腹泻临床观察[A];中华中医药学会第二十二届全国脾胃病学术交流会暨2010年脾胃病诊疗新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2010年
9 李跃华;相田园;张兰凤;金京南;张占强;杨京;;抑郁症患者肝郁气滞及肝郁脾虚型HAMD抑郁量表结构因素分析[A];中国中西医结合学会养生学与康复医学专业委员会委员会议暨第七次学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
10 李跃华;相田园;张兰凤;金京南;张占强;杨京;;抑郁症患者肝郁气滞及肝郁脾虚型HAMD抑郁量表结构因素分析[A];第六次全国中西医结合养生学与康复医学学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 田佳;苗药宜肝乐通过重点科技推广项目认证[N];人民日报海外版;2004年
2 山西省平遥县中医院 王金亮;乳房胀痛非独肝郁[N];中国中医药报;2013年
3 钟燕宇 韩萍 张雅静北京小汤山医院;中医调治肝郁脾虚型亚健康[N];中国中医药报;2009年
4 上海中医药大学 胡义扬;乙型肝炎如何预防[N];上海中医药报;2004年
5 宋欣荣;乙型肝炎新药素比伏在中国获准上市[N];科技日报;2007年
6 解放军458医院全军肝病中心主任医师 刘树人;乙型肝炎化验单怎样看[N];广东科技报;2008年
7 ;乙型肝炎的消毒处理[N];保健时报;2005年
8 陈黎明;乙型肝炎[N];家庭医生报;2006年
9 郑灵巧;慢性乙型肝炎仍难治愈[N];健康报;2008年
10 ;中西医结合治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效好[N];中国中医药报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 付义;女性肝郁患者心身状态初探及畅郁方药效作用实验研究[D];北京中医药大学;2005年
2 曾斌芳;脂肪性肝病病证、用方用药及其临床的一体化研究[D];新疆医科大学;2009年
3 赵晶;中医辨证治疗抑郁症肾虚肝郁型和肝郁脾虚型的临床研究[D];北京中医药大学;2008年
4 郇述玲;慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭和慢性乙型肝炎患者IL-33和ST2测定的临床价值[D];山东大学;2015年
5 程红球;慢性乙型肝炎中医证型对拉米夫定抗病毒的疗效评价及机制研究[D];湖北中医药大学;2015年
6 王珍丽;慢性乙型肝炎与慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者TACE甲基化状态的研究[D];山东大学;2015年
7 范玉琛;免疫负调控分子TIPE2在慢性HBV感染患者中的表达及临床意义[D];山东大学;2015年
8 朱艳玲;IFNα治疗慢性乙型肝炎无应答患者USP18的表达及调控研究[D];重庆医科大学;2012年
9 张华;江苏省乙型肝炎疾病负担与防治策略评价研究[D];东南大学;2015年
10 杨铂;基于中医传承辅助系统的慢性乙型肝炎活血化瘀方药研究[D];山东中医药大学;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 程德美;肝乐颗粒联合西药治疗慢性乙型肝炎(肝郁脾虚型)临床疗效观察[D];安徽中医药大学;2017年
2 沈银河;失眠症肝郁类证中医证型分布及其临床特点研究[D];福建中医药大学;2015年
3 成亚亚;柴芍调肝方治疗肝郁脾虚型肠易激综合征临床研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
4 柳江;针刺治疗肝郁脾虚型慢性泄泻(肠易激综合征)的临床研究[D];长春中医药大学;2015年
5 李西云;刺络放血配以针刺治疗肝郁脾虚型失眠的临床研究[D];成都中医药大学;2015年
6 郝春花;加减逍遥汤治疗耳鸣(肝郁脾虚型)的临床观察[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2016年
7 陈昀;愈溃汤治疗肝郁脾虚型消化性溃疡的临床疗效观察[D];山东中医药大学;2015年
8 周泽鹏;五行音乐辅助治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的疗效评价研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
9 梁巧文;基于5-HT信号系统枳芍散对肝郁脾虚型IBS的作用机理研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
10 王忱;解郁止泻方治疗缓解期慢性溃疡性结肠炎的疗效观察[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2016年
,本文编号:1800077
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/chuanranbingxuelunwen/1800077.html