不同放牧管理制度对家畜行为的影响
本文选题:放牧强度 + 牛羊混牧 ; 参考:《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:放牧生态学是草地生态学研究的重要领域。放牧生态系统中家畜行为不仅与家畜本身有关,也与草地类型、放牧强度及不同家畜配置的放牧方式有关。本文通过设置于内蒙古锡林郭勒典型草原区不同放牧强度(轻牧、中牧和重牧)及不同放牧组合(牛羊混牧和单牧)的控制实验,采用人工全天追踪观察结合缩时拍和GPS观测记录绵羊和牛的采食、反刍、站立、卧息以及游走等行为规律,系统分析放牧强度和放牧方式等草地管理制度对家畜行为的影响,这一研究对充实放牧生态学理论及草地合理利用的应用实践均有一定的意义。主要结论如下:1)各放牧强度和放牧方式绵羊全天时间分布基本上都表现为:采食时间反刍时间保养时间。2)放牧强度对家畜行为有显著影响。重度放牧延长绵羊的采食时间(有季节差异);放牧后期,中牧条件下,反刍速率降低;轻、中牧下绵羊保养时间有延长趋势;6月份家畜在轻牧区游走里程较高,7月份在重牧区较高,9月份在重牧区较低,8月份各放牧强度间无明显差异。3)放牧方式对家畜行为有显著影响。混牧能够延长绵羊采食时间,缩短牛采食时间;混牧能够增加采食速率;混牧延长绵羊站立时间,缩短卧息时间。绵羊的采食走步速率和咀嚼每个食团的次数与时间都明显高于牛。4)放牧季节对家畜行为也有显著影响。随着生长季的推移,绵羊采食时间先缩短后延长;由于植物生长的季节变化,家畜反刍每个食团的口数和次数都随生长季的推移而增加;绵羊的站立、卧息行为随着气温变化而变化明显,牛则相对稳定,天气炎热时,绵羊站立时间延长,卧息时间缩短,反之,卧息时间延长,站立时间缩短;家畜游走里程与草场食物资源质量和数量有关,放牧初期,食物资源较少,家畜游走里程增加。总之,中等的放牧强度,结合合理的家畜组合,可在保持草地可持续的基础上,充分利用草地资源,获得更大的经济利益。
[Abstract]:Grazing ecology is an important field in grassland ecology. The behavior of livestock in grazing ecosystem is not only related to livestock itself, but also to grassland types, grazing intensity and grazing patterns of different animal configurations. The control experiments of different grazing intensities (light, medium and heavy grazing) and different grazing combinations (cattle and sheep mixed grazing and single grazing) were carried out in the typical grassland area of Xilingol, Inner Mongolia. The feeding, ruminating, standing, resting and wandering behaviors of sheep and cattle were recorded by artificial full-day tracking and GPS observation. The effects of grazing intensity and grazing methods on livestock behavior were systematically analyzed. This study has certain significance to enrich grazing ecology theory and the application practice of grassland rational utilization. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the whole day time distribution of sheep under different grazing intensity and grazing mode is basically: feeding time ruminant time maintenance time. 2) grazing intensity has significant influence on livestock behavior. Heavy grazing prolonged the feeding time of sheep (there were seasonal differences; late grazing, moderate grazing conditions, the ruminant rate decreased; light, There was a tendency to prolong the maintenance time of sheep under middle grazing. The mileage of livestock walking in light grazing areas was higher in June and higher in heavy grazing areas in July. There was no significant difference in grazing intensity between different grazing intensities in heavy grazing areas in September and August. 3) grazing patterns had significant effects on livestock behavior. Mixed grazing can prolong the feeding time of sheep, shorten the feeding time of cattle, increase the feeding rate of mixed grazing, prolong the standing time and shorten the rest time of sheep. The feeding and walking rate of sheep and the number and time of chewing each feeding mass were significantly higher than that of cattle .4) the grazing season also had a significant effect on the behavior of domestic animals. As the growing season goes on, the feeding time of sheep first shortens and then prolongs; because of the seasonal variation of plant growth, the number and number of ruminants per pellet increase with the growth season; the standing of sheep, The behavior of lying rest changed obviously with the change of temperature, while that of cattle was relatively stable. When the weather was hot, the standing time of sheep was prolonged, the rest time of lying was shortened, the time of lying rest was prolonged and the time of standing was shortened. The walking mileage of livestock is related to the quality and quantity of food resources in pastures. In the early stage of grazing, the food resources are less and the mileage of livestock walks is increased. In a word, moderate grazing intensity and reasonable livestock combination can make full use of grassland resources on the basis of keeping grassland sustainable, and obtain greater economic benefits.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S812.8
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周道玮;孙海霞;钟荣珍;房义;黄迎新;;草地畜牧理论与实践[J];草地学报;2016年04期
2 方精云;;我国草原牧区呼唤新的草业发展模式[J];科学通报;2016年02期
3 沈海花;朱言坤;赵霞;耿晓庆;高树琴;方精云;;中国草地资源的现状分析[J];科学通报;2016年02期
4 张晓庆;张英俊;;绵羊牧食行为对限时放牧加补饲制度的响应[J];畜牧兽医学报;2015年11期
5 王萨仁娜;韩国栋;张圣微;包玉海;乌兰;王忠武;武春燕;;基于3S技术的绵羊牧食行为与草地环境相互作用研究[J];中国生态农业学报;2015年07期
6 刘晓娟;杨昌祥;丁丹;张洪丹;朱国栋;姚鸿云;王成杰;;牛羊混合放牧对荒漠草原植物群落特征的影响[J];中国草地学报;2015年03期
7 武倩;韩国栋;王成杰;刘晓娟;王忠武;李治国;;短期内混合放牧对荒漠草原植物群落特征的影响[J];草原与草业;2015年01期
8 周道玮;钟荣珍;孙海霞;黄迎新;房义;;草地划区轮牧饲养原则及设计[J];草业学报;2015年02期
9 魏鹏;安沙舟;孙宗玖;李海;邓海峰;张伟功;梁伊;卡斯达尔·努尔旦别克;;放牧条件下乳用伊犁马采食量的初步研究[J];草业科学;2015年01期
10 万里强;陈玮玮;李向林;何峰;万江春;吴维达;赵云;;放牧强度对山羊采食行为的影响[J];草业学报;2013年04期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 希吉日塔娜;不同放牧制度和轮牧时间对短花针茅荒漠草原植被的影响[D];内蒙古农业大学;2013年
2 房健;不同体尺大型草食动物采食对松嫩草地植被特征的响应及作用研究[D];东北师范大学;2013年
3 王岭;大型草食动物采食对植物多样性与空间格局的响应及行为适应机制[D];东北师范大学;2010年
4 白哈斯;放牧牛行为生态及其生产能力研究[D];东北师范大学;2003年
5 卫智军;荒漠草原放牧制度与家庭牧场可持续经营研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吕湾湾;放牧对典型草原优势植物水分利用率的影响[D];内蒙古大学;2016年
2 史亚博;放牧对典型草原群落地下生物量及植物个体根系功能性状的影响[D];内蒙古大学;2016年
3 李静;大型草食动物采食空间异质性的初步研究[D];东北师范大学;2014年
4 尤健;放牧方式对羊草草地土壤理化性质及放线菌遗传多样性的影响[D];东北师范大学;2013年
5 海兰;不同放牧强度下季节性休牧与放牧家畜牧食行为的研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2012年
6 王斐;典型草原地区放牧肉羊采食量预测模型建立[D];内蒙古农业大学;2011年
7 陈玮玮;栽培草地不同载畜率下放牧山羊牧食行为研究[D];兰州大学;2011年
8 乌日娜;内蒙古典型草原放牧绵羊牧食行为和采食量及消化率[D];内蒙古农业大学;2010年
9 闫学慧;暖季放牧针茅+杂类草草甸草原植物群落变化与放牧羔羊采食与生长的研究[D];新疆农业大学;2009年
10 萨格萨;不同品种放牧绵羊牧食行为与生产性能的比较研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2009年
,本文编号:1796327
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/1796327.html