不同厂家猪瘟疫苗剂量快速检测方法建立及临床免疫效果比较
[Abstract]:Swine fever is a severe infectious disease caused by swine fever virus. Vaccination is an effective measure to prevent swine fever. There are many manufacturers producing CSFV vaccine, but the dose of CSFV vaccine is different, which may affect the clinical immune effect. In this study, a fluorescent quantitative PCR method was established to detect the viral load of classical swine fever vaccine from six manufacturers in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. The dynamic changes of antibody to swine fever virus in serum of swine swarm were detected after inoculation of high and low doses of swine fever vaccine, and the clinical immune effects of two kinds of classical swine fever vaccine were compared and analyzed. The 200bp fragment of (HCLV) gene of CSV was amplified by RT-PCR method and cloned into T vector. The recombinant plasmid containing 200bp fragment was constructed. The recombinant plasmid was diluted by serial dilution and used as SYBR Green I fluorescent quantitative PCR template. To draw the standard curve for quantitative detection of HCLV. The results showed that in the range of (6.4 脳 10 ~ (7) 脳 10 ~ (2) copies/ 渭 L template concentration, the amplification efficiency of fluorescent quantitative PCR was 92.2, and the determination coefficient of the standard curve was 0.9997. The accurate sensitivity of this method is 6.4 脳 10 ~ (2) copies/ 渭 L, the coefficient of variation of repeatability test is less than 2, and the detection results of bovine viral diarrhea virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus are all negative. Sensitivity and reproducibility of HCLV fluorescence quantitative PCR assay. This method was used to detect the viral load of each dose of swine fever vaccine from six manufacturers in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. The results showed that the HCLV load of swine fever vaccine from different manufacturers had obvious difference. High dose swine fever vaccine E and low dose swine fever vaccine A were selected for clinical immunological test in a 900 pig farm with base sows. 60 weanling empty pregnant sows were randomly divided into two groups, one group was vaccinated with E (E group, the other group was vaccinated with A (A group (6 months later), and the piglets were immunized once at 20 days and 60 days after birth. Serum samples were collected from sows on day 55, day 14, day 14 at day 14, piglet serum from day 35 to day 56 and serum from growing pig from day 77 at day 98 to day 119 at day 140. The antibody against swine fever virus was detected by blocking ELISA method. The results showed that there was no difference between the two groups in the stage of empty pregnant sows. The blocking rate of CSFV antibody in group E was significantly higher than that in group A in other test stages (P0.05). Except for 35 d and 56 d of piglets, the coefficient of variation of antibody blocking of swine fever virus in group E was lower than that in group A, and the positive rate of antibody in group E was higher than that in group A, and reached a significant level at the stage of 35 d. The results of antibody detection showed that the data of CSFV antibody in group E was better than that in group A, which indicated that the clinical immune effect of CSFV vaccine E was better than that of vaccine A, indicating that the clinical immune effect of high dose CSFV vaccine was better than that of low dose vaccine. Comprehensive analysis showed that a fluorescent quantitative PCR method was established for rapid detection of CSFV doses. The dose of CSFV vaccine from different manufacturers was significantly different, and the clinical immunization effect of high dose CSFV vaccine was better than that of low dose CSFV vaccine. It provides experimental basis for clinical selection of swine fever vaccine from different manufacturers with different doses.
【学位授予单位】:北京农学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S858.28
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李安鹏;赵力;张智鹏;;不同厂家猪瘟疫苗免疫效果比对试验[J];动物医学进展;2017年01期
2 杨倩;周维依;于红欣;周双海;;猪圆环病毒2型减少猪肺泡巨噬细胞中伪狂犬病疫苗载量和CD80-CD86基因转录[J];北京农学院学报;2016年04期
3 张文;李忠华;余庆;胡群山;奎兴彪;王科文;;规模化猪场的猪瘟流行情况与免疫策略[J];养猪;2016年05期
4 杨德全;鞠厚斌;葛菲菲;刘健;李鑫;王建;周锦萍;;猪瘟病毒基因组遗传变异研究进展[J];中国动物传染病学报;2016年05期
5 章秋月;马华魁;郑新平;陈鹏强;陈秋勇;胡崇伟;修金生;吴波平;;实时荧光定量RT-PCR法比较猪瘟疫苗病毒含量[J];福建畜牧兽医;2016年04期
6 张志;李晓成;;我国猪瘟流行现状和防控建议[J];中国动物检疫;2015年08期
7 张雪;杨倩;于红欣;王俊;孟凡伟;周双海;;猪传染性胃肠炎病毒实时荧光定量PCR检测方法的建立与应用[J];中国兽医科学;2015年06期
8 杨红杰;于长青;林树伯;于红欣;周双海;李继良;;伪狂犬病病毒gB基因荧光定量PCR检测方法的建立[J];北京农学院学报;2015年03期
9 王斌仙;;猪瘟疫苗的种类及选择和使用方法[J];浙江畜牧兽医;2014年04期
10 栾培贤;肖建华;赵靓;王洪斌;;猪瘟国内外流行情况概述[J];东北农业大学学报;2013年09期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 涂长春;中国猪瘟流行病学现状与防制研究[D];中国农业大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李晶;猪瘟兔化弱毒疫苗国家标准品的初步研究与建立[D];西南大学;2009年
,本文编号:2190235
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2190235.html