一次性宫腔组织吸引管在异常子宫出血诊断中的临床价值

发布时间：2018-02-10 08:36

本文关键词： 子宫出血子宫内膜活组织检查一次性宫腔组织吸引管　出处：《重庆医学》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的探讨一次性宫腔组织吸引管在异常子宫出血诊断中的临床价值。方法选取因异常子宫出血需进行子宫内膜活检的患者75例,在接受常规分段诊刮术前利用一次性宫腔组织吸引管先获取子宫内膜组织。比较两种方法的取材标本满意率和诊断符合率。结果一次性宫腔组织吸引管取材标本满意率为85.3%(64/75),常规分段诊刮术取材标本满意率为94.7%(71/75),差异无统计学意义(P0.05);一次性宫腔组织吸引管取材诊断符合率为90.3%(56/62),常规分段诊刮术取材诊断符合率为93.5%(58/62),差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论一次性宫腔组织吸引管经济、有效、安全,可在一定程度上取代常规分段诊刮术作为评估异常子宫出血的初始检查。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical value of one-off aspiration tube of uterine cavity in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine hemorrhage. Methods 75 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding needed endometrial biopsy. The endometrial tissue was obtained before conventional curettage. The satisfactory rate and diagnostic coincidence rate of the two methods were compared. Results the disposable uterine cavity tissue suction tube was used to obtain the samples. The satisfaction rate was 85.3 / 75, and the satisfaction rate of conventional curettage was 94.775 / 77.The difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05); the diagnostic coincidence rate of one-off suction tube in uterine cavity was 90.33 / 56 / 62 and that of conventional curettage was 93.558 / 62a, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion one time uterine cavity tissue suction tube is economical. It is effective and safe, and can replace the conventional segmental curettage as the initial examination for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.
【作者单位】：广西医科大学第四附属医院病理科;广西医科大学第四附属医院妇科;
【基金】：广西壮族自治区卫生厅自筹经费科研课题(Z2012541)
【分类号】：R711.74

【参考文献】