无保护会阴自然阴道分娩与常规阴道分娩效果对比

发布时间：2018-02-20 16:11

本文关键词： 无保护会阴自然阴道分娩常规阴道分娩会阴完整性并发症疼痛　出处：《实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版)》2016年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的探讨无保护会阴自然阴道分娩与常规阴道分娩效果对比。方法选取河南省洛阳协和医院妇产科2014年10月~2016年2月收治的产妇95例作为研究对象,并随机抽签方法分为研究组47例与对照组48例,研究组采取无保护会阴自然阴道分娩方式协助分娩,对照组则采取常规阴道分娩法,对比两组产妇会阴情况以及疼痛程度。结果 1研究组产妇的会阴完整率远高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),Ⅰ度会阴裂伤率、Ⅱ度会阴裂伤的组间对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),而侧切率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);2研究组产妇产后的VAS疼痛评分是(2.61±0.79)分,明显低于对照组的(6.76±1.32)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与常规阴道分娩法相比,无保护会阴自然阴道分娩的临床效果更佳,可有效提升产妇会阴完整性,降低侧切率,同时减轻其疼痛感,值得借鉴。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the effect of unprotected perineum spontaneous vaginal delivery with conventional vaginal delivery. Methods 95 cases of parturient admitted from October 2014 to February 2016 in Luoyang Union Hospital of Henan Province were selected as the research objects. The study group (47 cases) and the control group (48 cases) were randomly divided into two groups. The study group adopted the method of unprotected perineum spontaneous vaginal delivery, while the control group adopted the conventional vaginal delivery method. Results 1 the perineal integrity rate in the study group was much higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), the rate of perineal laceration in the first degree and the second degree perineal laceration were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference (P 0.05), but the side cut rate was significantly lower than that in the control group. The VAS pain score of the puerpera in the study group was 2.61 卤0.79, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.76 卤1.32). Conclusion compared with the conventional vaginal delivery method, the unprotected perineal spontaneous vaginal delivery has a better clinical effect, which can effectively improve perineal integrity, reduce the rate of lateral resection, and alleviate the pain of parturient, which is worthy of reference.
【作者单位】：河南省洛阳协和医院妇产科;
【分类号】：R714

【相似文献】