当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 妇产科论文 >

改良超长激素替代方案改善胚胎种植失败患者冻融胚胎移植妊娠结局

发布时间:2018-03-19 11:34

  本文选题:胚胎移植 切入点:激素替代疗法 出处:《第二军医大学学报》2017年07期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:目的探讨改良超长激素替代方案对既往胚胎种植失败再行冻融胚胎移植(FET)患者妊娠结局的影响。方法选择2015年1月至2017年1月于第二军医大学长海医院生殖医学中心体外受精/卵胞质内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)着床失败再次行FET的患者669例,根据本次FET周期子宫内膜准备方案分为2组:改良超长激素组(n=184)患者接受改良超长激素替代方案,单纯激素组(n=485)患者接受单纯激素替代方案。回顾性分析2种子宫内膜准备方案对患者妊娠结局的影响。结果 2组患者的年龄、体质量指数、不孕年限、移植胚胎数、转化日子宫内膜厚度、移植日子宫内膜厚度差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);改良超长激素组的优质胚胎率低于单纯激素组(50.9%vs 64.8%,P0.01),但囊胚移植率高于单纯激素组(57.4%vs 18.3%,P0.01);改良超长激素组胚胎着床率和临床妊娠率均高于单纯激素组,差异有统计学意义(29.8%vs 23.8%,46.7%vs 35.9%;P均0.05)。临床妊娠的logistic多因素回归分析提示,囊胚移植率和优质胚胎率是临床妊娠的独立影响因素。按照移植胚胎胎龄进行的亚组分析结果显示,卵裂期胚胎移植周期中,虽然单纯激素组的优质胚胎率高于改良超长激素组(67.5%vs 58.0%,P0.05),但两组的胚胎着床率和临床妊娠率差异均无统计学意义(23.0%vs 16.7%;34.9%vs 32.0%;P均0.05);在囊胚移植周期中,单纯激素组与改良超长激素组的优质胚胎率差异无统计学意义(52.7%vs 45.5%,P0.05),改良超长激素组的胚胎着床率和临床妊娠率均高于单纯激素组(39.6%vs 27.2%,56.9%vs 40.2%;P均0.05)。结论对于既往胚胎种植失败再次行FET助孕的不孕患者,改良超长激素替代方案可提高胚胎着床率及临床妊娠率,值得临床推广。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of modified super-long hormone replacement protocol on pregnancy outcome in patients with frozen and thawed embryo transfer after failed embryo implantation. Methods from January 2015 to January 2017, reproductive medicine was selected in Changhai Hospital, second military Medical University. In vitro fertilization / intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF / ICSI-ETT) implantation failed to perform FET again in 669 patients. According to the current FET cycle endometrial preparation program was divided into two groups: the modified super-long hormone group was treated with modified super-long hormone replacement regimen. The effects of two kinds of endometrial preparation regimen on pregnancy outcome were analyzed retrospectively. Results the age, body mass index, infertile years, number of embryos transferred in the two groups were analyzed retrospectively. The thickness of endometrium on the day of transformation, There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness on the day of transplantation; the rate of high quality embryos in the modified super long hormone group was lower than that in the simple hormone group (50.9 vs 64.8% P 0.01), but the blastocyst transfer rate was higher than that in the simple hormone group (57.4% vs 18.3% P 0.01); the embryo implantation rate and the impending rate in the modified super long hormone group were higher than those in the control group. The pregnancy rate in bed was higher than that in single hormone group. The difference was statistically significant (29.8 vs 23.8 vs 46.7 vs 35.9P). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the rate of blastocyst transfer and the rate of high quality embryos were independent influencing factors of clinical pregnancy. The results of subgroup analysis according to the gestational age of transplanted embryos showed that the rate of blastocyst transfer and the rate of high quality embryos were independent factors of clinical pregnancy. In the cleavage embryo transfer cycle, although the rate of high quality embryos in the simple hormone group was higher than that in the modified super long hormone group (67.5 vs 58.0), there was no significant difference in embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (23.0 vs 16.734. 9 vs 32. 0% P 0. 05). In the blastocyst transfer cycle, there was no significant difference in embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate (P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the rate of high quality embryos between the simple hormone group and the modified super long hormone group. The embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in the modified super long hormone group were higher than those in the simple hormone group (P < 0.05). Conclusion the embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in the modified super long hormone group are higher than those in the simple hormone group (39.6 vs 27.2g / 56.9 vs 40.2%, P < 0.05). Conclusion for the former embryo species, the implantation rate and the clinical pregnancy rate of the modified super long hormone group are higher than those of the simple hormone group. The infertile patient who failed to receive FET to help pregnancy again, The modified super-long hormone replacement can increase embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate, which is worth popularizing.
【作者单位】: 第二军医大学长海医院生殖医学中心;
【分类号】:R714.8

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 ;请远离家中有毒有害生活用品[J];科学生活;2009年10期

2 决明子;;有害家居用品的替代方案[J];人生与伴侣(月末版);2008年01期

3 ;17种日用品有毒[J];品牌与标准化;2010年03期

4 ;危害宝宝的有毒日常用品[J];人生与伴侣(上半月版);2010年09期

5 ;有害家居用品的替代方案[J];医药与保健;2010年11期

6 张军;某污染企业搬迁替代方案的优化选择[J];中国公共卫生;2005年05期

7 小君;;有毒用品知多少[J];健康;2010年07期

8 ;[J];;年期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 李柴;莹莹;徐凌;张树深;;基于SD TOPSIS的交通规划环境影响替代方案优化研究[A];2011中国可持续发展论坛2011年专刊(一)[C];2011年

2 Kevin Buckner;;无铅清洗及清洁测试替代方案[A];2007中国高端SMT学术会议论文集[C];2007年

3 高世明;Nathaniel S.Pearre;赵菊芬;;南(中国)海争端潜在替代方案之分析[A];《中国海洋法学评论》2013年卷第1期[C];2013年

相关重要报纸文章 前9条

1 ;准备,再准备[N];民营经济报;2006年

2 梁言顺;我们怎样定目标[N];学习时报;2008年

3 【美】埃里克·欧林·赖特 著 李彩艳 译;“解放的社会科学”的三项基本任务[N];中国社会科学院报;2008年

4 记者 张环;美参议院否决两党替代方案[N];金融时报;2013年

5 李春元;推行烟花爆竹替代方案正当时[N];中国环境报;2013年

6 ;AvantGo服务的替代方案[N];电脑报;2002年

7 记者 张锦芳;就迁都替代方案韩国野达成协议[N];新华每日电讯;2005年

8 作者 拉尔夫·达伦道夫;让大学拥有办学自主权[N];经济观察报;2003年

9 黄保才;正视“校车”停开后的上学难题[N];台州日报;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 许野;城市交通规划环境影响评价的替代方案研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年

2 于铭;美国环境影响评价制度中的替代方案研究[D];中国海洋大学;2006年

3 杨洋;城市交通发展战略环境评价替代方案研究[D];大连理工大学;2010年

4 周超;我国建设项目环境影响评价制度实施中存在的问题及对策研究[D];江西理工大学;2010年



本文编号:1634082

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/1634082.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户85c14***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com