采用产程新标准后产钳助产相关影响因素及对母儿结局影响研究
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the related factors of forceps delivery and to analyze the effect of forceps delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods from January 2010 to August 2015, 142 cases of parturient in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University who were given delivery with forceps due to the extension of the second stage of labor were selected. The observation group adopted the new standard of labor process (after August 2013) in a total of 32 cases. In the control group, 110 cases were treated with the old standard of labor process (January 2010 to July 2013). The clinical data before forceps delivery, the incidence of forceps delivery and perinatal outcome were analyzed, and the related factors of forceps delivery were analyzed by nested case-control study and conditional Logistic regression analysis. Results after the adoption of the new labor standard, the incidence of delivery by forceps was significantly decreased after the extension of the second stage of labor (0.56 vs 1.81 P 0.05). The standard of labor process was the independent protective factor of forceps delivery (B value -1.420 / OR 0.242 / 95 CI 0.131 / 0.445), while the admission BMI value (B value 0.492OR 1.63595 / CI 1.083 / 2.469) and amniotic fluid feces staining (B = 0.312), respectively. OR 1.367 ~ 95 CI 1.091 ~ 1.711) was an independent risk factor, which was closely related to forceps delivery (P0.05). The incidence of cervical laceration in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, while the neonatal 1 min Apgar score was significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion the new standard of labor process is related to the decrease of the incidence of forceps delivery, but the new and old standard forceps have no extensive influence on the outcome of mothers and infants.
【作者单位】: 重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科;重庆医科大学附属第一医院医保办;
【基金】:国家临床重点专科建设经费资助项目(201101ck ZD)
【分类号】:R717
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 ;新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)[J];中华妇产科杂志;2014年07期
2 吴艳欣;王子莲;;羊水胎粪污染的临床意义及处理[J];中华围产医学杂志;2012年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 余昕烊;张伟;王恒宇;徐萍;漆洪波;;采用产程新标准后产钳助产相关影响因素及对母儿结局影响研究[J];中国实用妇科与产科杂志;2016年07期
2 王永琴;魏兴武;桑灵;逯金祥;齐雪静;刘玉;何佳;;可行走式硬膜外分娩镇痛的应用研究[J];中国妇幼保健;2016年13期
3 徐丽梅;王静;;无痛分娩下新产程时限管理产程对母儿结局的临床分析[J];中国妇幼保健;2016年10期
4 王静敏;武璁;汪素坤;;新旧产程标准对分娩的影响[J];蚌埠医学院学报;2016年05期
5 杨师琪;钟梅;;产程研究进展[J];实用妇产科杂志;2016年05期
6 任瑞雪;贾晨阳;;新产程标准实行对阴道分娩中转剖宫产率的影响[J];中国临床医生杂志;2016年05期
7 柳亚芬;米鑫;;2009~2014年剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化的临床分析[J];中国临床医生杂志;2016年04期
8 邱洪涛;王剑鹰;刘晶;;运动及自由体位在无创分娩中的应用[J];中国妇幼健康研究;2016年02期
9 何梅;周文红;;间苯三酚加速产程进展的效果分析[J];国际妇产科学杂志;2016年01期
10 陈逢春;黄利川;徐燕媚;莫萍;;新产程标准处理产程的可行性分析[J];辽宁医学杂志;2016年01期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李小英;朱丽红;;产钳助产的应用及临床分析[J];新疆医学;2001年03期
2 向广静;杨厚泽;;产钳助产的临床应用[J];中原医刊;2006年04期
3 陈秀成;侯淑凤;;产钳助产临床应用体会[J];中国医药导报;2010年02期
4 严晨蕴;134例产钳助产临床分析[J];浙江临床医学;2000年10期
5 吴华芬;产钳助产202例临床体会[J];江苏医药;2003年11期
6 舒为群,肖琳,曹珍修,邵勇;产钳助产916例临床分析[J];重庆医学;2003年10期
7 李瑞敏,张爱勤,路旭娜;产钳助产234例临床分析[J];中原医刊;2004年03期
8 唐建瑛,潘晨萍;产钳助产122例临床分析[J];浙江临床医学;2004年04期
9 郭秀军;产钳助产临床分析[J];中国自然医学杂志;2004年02期
10 邓艾萍,李家英;产钳助产317例临床分析[J];重庆医学;2004年10期
,本文编号:2304317
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2304317.html