当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 妇产科论文 >

经阴道与腹部超声诊断宫角妊娠的临床价值

发布时间:2019-06-18 11:06
【摘要】:目的比较经阴道超声与经腹部超声检查对宫角妊娠的诊断价值。方法将我院妇产科2015年5月至2016年5月期间收治的80例疑为宫角妊娠的患者作为研究对象,所有患者均先行经腹部超声检查,再行经阴道超声检查,以病理诊断结果为金标准,比较两种检查方式对宫角妊娠的诊断准确率,总结宫角妊娠的超声特征。结果经腹部超声诊断对宫角妊娠的诊断敏感性为61.33%、特异性为20.00%、阳性预测值为92.00%、阴性预测值为3.33%、准确率为58.75%;经阴道超声对宫角妊娠的诊断敏感性为82.67%、特异性为80.00%、阳性预测值为98.41%、阴性预测值为23.53%、准确率为82.50%。经阴道超声检查对宫角妊娠的诊断准确性、敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值均明显高于经腹部超声检查,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。经腹部超声与经阴道超声联合诊断宫角妊娠的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为90.00%、90.67%、80.00%、98.55%、36.36%。结论与腹部超声检查比较,经阴道超声检查对宫角妊娠的诊断准确率更高,并且二者联用能够有效提高宫角妊娠的诊断敏感性与准确性,能够为临床早期诊断、处理宫角妊娠提供有效依据。
[Abstract]:Objective To compare the value of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of uterine horn pregnancy. Methods From May 2015 to May 2016,80 cases of suspected uterine horn pregnancy were treated as the subject of the study. All the patients were examined by transvaginal ultrasound, and the result of pathological diagnosis was the gold standard. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods to the pregnancy of the uterine horn, and to sum up the ultrasonic characteristics of the uterine horn pregnancy. Results The diagnostic sensitivity of abdominal ultrasound was 61.33%, the specificity was 20.00%, the positive predictive value was 92.00%, the negative predictive value was 3.33%, the accuracy rate was 58.75%, and the diagnostic sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound to the uterine horn pregnancy was 82.67% and the specificity was 80.00%. The positive predictive value was 98.41%, the negative predictive value was 23.53%, and the accuracy rate was 82.50%. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of uterine horn pregnancy were significantly higher than that of transabdominal ultrasonography (P0.05). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of abdominal ultrasound combined with transvaginal ultrasound were 90.00%, 90.67%, 80.00%, 98.55%, 36.36%, respectively. Conclusion Compared with abdominal ultrasonography, transvaginal ultrasonography is more accurate in the diagnosis of uterine horn pregnancy, and the combination of the two methods can effectively improve the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of the uterine horn pregnancy, and can provide an effective basis for the early diagnosis and treatment of the uterine horn pregnancy.
【作者单位】: 宝鸡市中医医院超声科;
【分类号】:R714.224;R445.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郑立红,李世英,唐小丽,石敏,谢蓉,袁俊玲;保守治疗右宫角妊娠1例的观察与护理[J];西南国防医药;2005年01期

2 王娟勤;;宫角妊娠保守治疗的观察及护理[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2009年02期

3 樊伟亚;;宫角妊娠患者的观察与护理[J];医药论坛杂志;2009年02期

4 余琴;曹毅;胡琢瑛;肖琳;;宫腔镜下宫角妊娠患者的诊治与护理[J];激光杂志;2009年02期

5 沈琼;;超声在宫角妊娠诊断及鉴别诊断中的应用[J];医学信息(中旬刊);2011年03期

6 熊艳;欧倩;;经阴道彩色多普勒超声对宫角妊娠和输卵管间质部妊娠的诊断及鉴别诊断[J];江西医药;2011年05期

7 杨沪;;宫角妊娠超声诊断要点[J];中国实用医药;2013年34期

8 朱素杰;谭双燕;;1例宫角妊娠保守治疗的观察与护理[J];现代护理;2006年15期

9 黄丽卿;杨璞;卢菁菁;;经阴道三维超声鉴别宫角妊娠与输卵管间质部妊娠的意义分析[J];实用医技杂志;2012年03期

10 莫献凌;;经阴道超声对输卵管间质部妊娠及宫角妊娠的鉴别诊断[J];影像技术;2012年03期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 曹晓晔;韩晓峰;;经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断宫角妊娠的价值分析[A];中国超声医学工程学会第二届全国妇产及计划生育超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年

2 于绍梅;;超声在诊断输卵管间质部妊娠中的应用分析[A];2010年贵州省医学会超声学分会学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

3 方必东;周胜法;肖云洲;;宫角妊娠与输卵管间质部妊娠的MRI诊断价值[A];2012年浙江省放射学术年会论文集[C];2012年

4 邵建兰;王琦;张红薇;;B超在早期宫角妊娠诊治中的临床应用价值[A];中国超声医学工程学会第三届全国妇产及计划生育超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

5 周彩云;罗红;;超声早期鉴别诊断间质部妊娠与宫角妊娠[A];2011'中国西部声学学术交流会论文集[C];2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 张晓霞;早期宫角妊娠与间质部妊娠超声图像的对比研究[D];新疆医科大学;2009年



本文编号:2501434

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2501434.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户dfea4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com