三种机用镍钛器械对中度弯曲根管成型能力的分析
发布时间:2018-06-30 00:16
本文选题:根管预备 + 镍钛器械 ; 参考:《新疆医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:比较Protaper next、Waveone、Twisted File Adaptive(TFA)三种机用镍钛器械对中度弯曲透明树脂模拟根管的成型能力的影响,为临床应用提供实验依据。方法:选取80个中度弯曲(20°)树脂模拟根管按随机数字表法等分为4组,即TFA组(T组)、Waveone组(W组)、Protaper next组(P组)与不锈钢K挫组(K组),每组20个根管,分别采用Twisted File Adaptive(TFA)挫、Waveone挫、Protaper next挫及不锈钢K挫进行根管预备,记录根管预备时间,测定预备后根管工作长度,扫描仪获取预备前后树脂模拟根管图像,使用Adobe PhotoshopCS5.0和ImageJ软件进行图像重叠并分别测量根管弯曲度的变化、根尖偏移情况,记录轴中心率,从相距根尖孔1mm处开始作为一个观测点,分别取3个观测点,即:选择树脂模拟根管距离根尖孔3、5、7mm。统计学分析计量资料采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用Dunnett分析和t检验,检验水准?=0.05。结果:(1)W组根管预备时间最短,T组次之,K组最长,四组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。4种器械预备后根管工作长度变化值差异无统计学意义(P0.05);(2)距根尖孔3、5、7 mm截面,T组偏移量最小,与其他各组对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05),W组次之,K组偏移量最大(P0.05),T组轴中心率最高,其次为W组、P组,K组最低,四组轴中心率对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05);(3)预备前,各组弯曲度对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05),预备后,各组弯曲度均降低,以K组弯曲度降低最为明显,T组弯曲度变化幅度最小。结论:TFA镍钛机用器械对中度弯曲树脂模拟根管成型能力好,弹性性能高,韧度强,中心定位能力较高,偏移较少。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the effects of three kinds of machine Ni-Ti instruments on the formability of medium bending transparent resin to simulate root canal, and to provide experimental basis for clinical application. Methods: 80 moderately curved (20 掳) resin simulated root canals were randomly divided into 4 groups: TFA group (T group), Waveone group (W group), Protaper next group (P group) and stainless steel K frustration group (K group), with 20 root canals in each group. Root canal preparation was performed with Twisted File Adaptive (TFA) Waveone Protaper next cadaver and stainless steel K cadaver respectively. The root canal preparation time was recorded, the working length of root canal was measured, and the simulated root canal images were obtained by scanners before and after preparation. Adobe Photoshop CS5.0 and ImageJ software were used to perform image overlap and to measure the change of root canal curvature, root tip deviation and axis center rate respectively. From the point of 1mm distance from the apical foramen to the root tip, three observation points were selected, respectively. That is to say, selecting resin to simulate the root canal distance from the apical foramen 3 to 5, 7 mm. The measurement data of statistical analysis were analyzed by single factor ANOVA, Dunnett analysis and t test were used in the comparison, the test level was 0. 05%. Results: (1) the shortest root canal preparation time in group W was the longest in group K, and the difference among the four groups was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the working length of root canal between group W and group T (P0.05); (2). Compared with other groups, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05) the deviation of group K was the largest (P0.05), the rate of axial center of group T was the highest, and that of group W was the lowest (P0.05); (3). There was no significant difference in the curvature of each group (P0.05). After preparation, the curvature of each group decreased, especially in group K the most obvious decrease in the curvature of T group was the smallest. Conclusion the wee TFA Nickel-Titanium Machine has the advantages of good forming ability, high elasticity, high toughness, high center location ability and less deviation to the medium bending resin for simulating root canal formation.
【学位授予单位】:新疆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R781.05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王丽娜;刘启成;傅康贵;史春;牛卫东;;机用镍钛器械Mtwo及K3预备磨牙弯曲根管成形能力的比较[J];中国组织工程研究;2015年12期
2 邵彤菲;侯晓玫;侯本祥;;往复运动镍钛锉根管预备成形能力的体外研究[J];华西口腔医学杂志;2014年06期
3 丁岩;程玮;钱t;;两种机用镍钛器械预备根管一次法根管充填术的效果比较[J];医学临床研究;2014年11期
4 耿崎峰;贾甜甜;;两种机用镍钛根管预备器械在树脂模拟弯曲根管内的成形能力[J];口腔材料器械杂志;2014年01期
5 葛久禹;;镍钛根管预备器械[J];中国实用口腔科杂志;2014年01期
6 江淑梅;李健;;手用ProTaper镍钛锉预备弯曲根管的临床应用[J];湖南师范大学学报(医学版);2013年02期
7 李辰;朱亚琴;;4种根管预备方法对弯曲根管清洁效果的比较[J];安徽医科大学学报;2012年08期
8 闫文娟;;机用和手用ProTaper预备中度弯曲根管后的器械损伤情况评价[J];牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志;2012年07期
9 白玉龙;陈阵;王永兰;王瑛慧;;3种机用镍钛锉对弯曲根管成形能力的比较[J];口腔医学研究;2012年05期
10 顾远平;;手用镍钛器械锉结合不锈钢K锉预弯法去除根管台阶疗效分析[J];西部医学;2011年08期
,本文编号:2083997
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/kouq/2083997.html
最近更新
教材专著