当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

直接前方入路与后外侧入路在全髋置换术中的疗效比较

发布时间:2018-01-19 20:27

  本文关键词: 直接前方入路 全髋置换术 疼痛 髋关节功能 出处:《中国现代医学杂志》2017年19期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:目的研究直接前方入路(DAA)在全髋置换术(THA)中的应用疗效及经验总结。方法共纳入156例首次THA患者,其中82例采用后外侧入路(PLA),74例采用DAA,对比临床疗效。结果两组的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),DAA组的术中出血、术后引流时间和引流量减小,与PLA组比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组围术期并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。DAA组术后1、3和7 d疼痛评分低于PLA组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。DAA组的部分下地负重、完全负重时间和总住院时间较PLA组缩短,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。DAA组术后1、3和6个月Harris髋关节功能评分高于PLA组,术后6个月DAA组髋关节功能优于PLA组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 THA采用DAA手术创伤更小,疼痛减轻,早期功能锻炼时间缩短,髋关节功能改善更佳,有较好的应用安全性和有效性。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the efficacy and experience of direct anterior approach in total hip replacement (tha). Methods 156 patients with first THA were included. Among them, 82 cases were treated with posterior lateral approach and 74 cases were treated with DAA.The results showed that there was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P 0.05). The intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage time and drainage volume decreased in DAA group, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that in PLA group (P 0.05). The incidence of perioperative complications in the two groups was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pain scores between P0.05U 路DAA group and PLA group on the 3rd and 7th day after operation, and there was significant difference between the two groups. The time of complete weight loading and total hospitalization time were shorter than that of PLA group, and the difference was statistically significant. The score of hip function of Harris group was higher than that of PLA group at 1: 3 and 6 months after operation. The function of hip joint in DAA group was better than that in PLA group 6 months after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion the operation of DAA in THA is less traumatic and the pain is alleviated. Early functional exercise time is shortened, hip joint function is improved better, has good application safety and effectiveness.
【作者单位】: 安徽医科大学附属省立医院骨二科;
【分类号】:R687.4
【正文快照】: 全髋置换术(total hip arthroplas,THA)是治疗股骨头坏死、骨关节炎和股骨近端不稳定性骨折的重要手术方法[1],常用手术入路有外侧和后侧,而直接前方入路(direct anterior approach,DAA)是真正意义上的微创,恢复快、疼痛轻[2]。不切断髋部任何肌肉即可显露髋关节,术后短期临床

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李维平,花北顺哉,诹访英行;颈前方入路治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症[J];浙江医学;1994年S1期

2 李俊峰;王守森;陈贤明;王如密;;经前方入路切除斜坡病变的解剖与手术技术[J];福州总医院学报;2009年01期

3 张远征,段国升,程东源,薛怀安,马晓东;颈椎病前方入路术后恢复不良的原因分析[J];中华神经外科杂志;1996年03期

4 俞银贤;马金忠;;微创直接前方入路髋关节置换术相关研究[J];国际骨科学杂志;2014年01期

5 李俊峰;王守森;陈贤明;王如密;;经前方入路切除斜坡病变的解剖与手术技术[J];中国临床神经外科杂志;2010年05期

6 张远征,段国升,程东源,薛怀安,马晓东;术后椎间隙塌陷──前方入路治疗颈椎病应注意的问题[J];军医进修学院学报;1996年04期

7 张远征,段国升,程东源,薛怀安;颈椎病前方入路术后X线改变[J];中华神经外科杂志;1995年02期

8 李坚;陈之青;谢金兔;;前方入路胸腰椎骨折手术25例临床分析[J];杭州师范学院学报(医学版);2006年04期

9 张勤;庄卫平;王文五;谢超山;;前方入路钢板前置固定治疗肱骨中下段骨折[J];重庆医学;2010年18期

10 孙晓合;星状神经节阻滞术操作心得[J];实用医技杂志;2005年01期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 黄义星;池永龙;金联洲;;上胸椎前方入路重要解剖结构的三维重建与可视化研究[A];2009年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 李俊峰;经前方入路处理斜坡病变的显微解剖和虚拟影像解剖研究[D];福建医科大学;2010年



本文编号:1445434

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1445434.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b0809***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com