当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

股骨远端骨折内外侧锁定加压钢板的生物力学比较

发布时间:2018-06-29 11:39

  本文选题:股骨远端骨折 + 内侧锁定加压钢板 ; 参考:《河北医科大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:股骨远端外侧锁定加压钢板成为大多数骨科医生治疗股骨远端骨折的首要选择,但是对于股骨远端粉碎性的内侧髁骨折,应用外侧钢板时,由于缺乏对内侧骨折线的固定而失去稳定性,会导致一系列的并发症,使得畸形愈合、骨折不愈合、功能障碍、旋转不良和植入失败的发生率仍很高。为此我们设计了一种股骨远端内侧锁定加压钢板,以弥补股骨远端粉碎性的内侧髁骨折失固定的不足,现我们通过垂直压缩试验、扭转试验及循环负载试验来比较股骨远端内侧锁定加压钢板与股骨远端外侧锁定加压钢板的生物力学特性,为临床治疗股骨远端骨折提供新方法。方法:选取24对成人新鲜尸股骨,造成股骨远端髁上骨折(AO分型为33-A3),每对标本随机分成内侧钢板固定组和外侧钢板固定组,内侧钢板固定组标为实验组,外侧钢板固定组标为固定组。分别做垂直压缩、扭转、循环负载三种生物力学实验研究,每件标本只能做三种生物力学中的一种。垂直加压试验中预先予以100N负载固定标本,使用材料试验机系统的红外线设备标定标记点,以50N/秒的速度加压直至800N,使用红外线设备记录干骺端截骨间隙量;然后给予持续加压,直至内固定失败或骨折;扭转试验中,预先予以1Nm的扭转力,设置最大扭矩20Nm,最大扭角6°,扭转速度10°/min,传感器上记录每个扭转角度所对应的扭矩;然后给予持续扭转,直至内固定失败或骨折;循环负载试验中,预先予以100N负载固定标本,设置频率为0.1Hz,然后给予从100N-300N的循环负载,循环10次,间隔10秒,再给予从100N-400N的循环负载,循环10次,间隔10秒。设置增量为100N,直至给予从100N-800N的循环负载,循环10次。记录每10次循环后的截骨间隙改变量及整个循环负载试验结束后最终的截骨间隙改变量。结果:在垂直加压试验中,内侧钢板的平均垂直刚度与外侧钢板的平均垂直刚度无明显差异(819.5 vs 821.4 N/mm;P=0.544);在扭转试验中,内侧钢板的平均扭转刚度比外侧钢板的平均扭转刚度小(1.97 vs 2.29Nm/degree;P0.05);内侧钢板与外侧钢板的屈服点在压力-位移曲线及扭矩-角度曲线上均未出现。在循环负载试验中,内侧钢板组的最终不可逆形变小于外侧钢板组的最终不可逆形变(0.035 vs 0.072 mm;P0.05)。结论:股骨远端内侧锁定加压钢板的稳定性强于股骨远端外侧锁定加压钢板,其弹性回缩力强于外侧钢板,这有利于内固定患者术后早期及长期功能锻炼,对于治疗股骨远端骨折,尤其是股骨远端内侧髁的骨折具有明显的临床应用价值。
[Abstract]:Objective: Lateral locking compression plate of distal femur is the first choice for most orthopedic doctors to treat distal femoral fracture, but for comminuted medial condylar fracture of distal femur, lateral plate is used. The loss of stability due to the lack of fixation of the medial fracture line can lead to a series of complications, resulting in a high incidence of malunion, nonunion, dysfunction, poor rotation and implant failure. So we designed a kind of medial locking compression plate of the distal femur to make up for the missing fixation of the comminuted medial condylar fracture of the distal femur. Now we have passed the vertical compression test. Torsion test and cyclic load test were used to compare the biomechanical characteristics of medial locking compression plate and lateral locking compression plate of distal femur, which provided a new method for clinical treatment of distal femoral fracture. Methods: 24 pairs of adult fresh cadaveric femur were selected to cause supracondylar fracture of distal femur (AO classified as 33-A3). Each pair of specimens was randomly divided into medial plate fixation group and lateral plate fixation group, and the medial plate fixation group was labeled as experimental group. The lateral plate fixation group was marked as fixation group. Vertical compression, torsion and cyclic loading were carried out in three biomechanics experiments. Each specimen can only do one of the three biomechanics. In the vertical compression test, the fixed specimen was preloaded with 100N. The mark points were labeled with infrared equipment of the material testing machine system, and the pressure was up to 800N at the speed of 50 Ns / s. The interspace of metaphyseal osteotomy was recorded by infrared equipment. In the torsion test, the torsion force of 1Nm was given in advance, the maximum torque was 20Nm, the maximum torsion angle was 6 掳, the torsion velocity was 10 掳/ min, and the torque corresponding to each torsion angle was recorded on the sensor. They were then given continuous torsion until the internal fixation failed or fracture; in the cyclic load test, 100 N loading was prefixed at a frequency of 0.1 Hz, and then given a cyclic load from 100N-300N for 10 cycles, at intervals of 10 seconds, Again give a loop load from 100N-400 N, loop 10 times, at intervals of 10 seconds. Set the increment to 100 N until the loop load from 100N-800N is given 10 times. The change of osteotomy space after 10 cycles and the final change of osteotomy space after the whole cycle load test were recorded. Results: in the vertical compression test, the mean vertical stiffness of the medial plate was not significantly different from that of the outer plate (819.5 vs 821.4 N / mm P0.544), while in the torsion test, the mean vertical stiffness of the inner plate was not significantly different from that of the outer plate (P 0.544). The mean torsional stiffness of the inner plate was smaller than that of the outer plate (1.97 vs 2.29 Nm / degree of degree P 0.05), and the yield points of the inner plate and the outer plate were not found on the pressure-displacement curve and the torque-angle curve. In the cyclic loading test, the final irreversible deformation in the medial plate group was less than that in the lateral plate group (0.035 vs 0.072 mm / kg, P0.05). Conclusion: the stability of medial locking compression plate of distal femur is stronger than that of lateral locking compression plate of distal femur, and its elastic retractive force is stronger than that of lateral plate, which is beneficial to the early and long term functional exercise after internal fixation. It has obvious clinical application value in the treatment of distal femoral fracture, especially the fracture of medial condyle of distal femur.
【学位授予单位】:河北医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄绍初;李雄;曹粉红;;锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨骨折的临床分析[J];临床医学工程;2011年09期

2 丁华文;尹生云;;锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨骨折的临床观察[J];求医问药(下半月);2012年02期

3 常国荣;;锁定加压钢板治疗80例胫骨骨折的疗效观察[J];中外医学研究;2012年19期

4 杨剑;;锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨骨折66例临床观察[J];亚太传统医药;2012年09期

5 李波;杨曙光;周涛;赵厚俊;赖培丰;;锁定加压钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床观察[J];中国实用医药;2013年19期

6 尤笑迎;刘贤修;李红普;;锁定加压钢板在股骨远端粉碎性骨折中的应用[J];中国误诊学杂志;2006年03期

7 彭慧;魏星;张X;;AO锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨Pilon骨折31例[J];陕西医学杂志;2007年11期

8 曹清;马宝通;;锁定加压钢板的临床应用[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2008年12期

9 王玉波;姜国;;应用T形锁定加压钢板治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的初步体会[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2008年20期

10 王洁伟;张国杰;宁鉴;;锁定加压钢板微创治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J];中国中西医结合外科杂志;2009年03期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 李一凡;曹德良;徐志英;李永山;徐炜;徐刚;张畅;;锁定加压钢板在胫骨近、远端骨折中的应用[A];2009第十七届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年

2 张春松;;锁定加压钢板微创固定胫骨骨折18例[A];2009第十七届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年

3 徐叶青;徐德洪;魏宏达;;锁定加压钢板治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折[A];浙江省医学会手外科学分会成立大会暨2008年学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年

4 牛庆礼;孙辉;杨树彬;丁元通;;锁定加压钢板治疗四肢骨折术后失败原因探讨[A];2009年全国骨与关节损伤新技术研讨会暨第六届股骨头缺血性坏死修复与再造学习班论文汇编[C];2009年

5 ;锁定加压钢板原理及临床应用[A];2013中国工程院科技论坛暨浙江省骨科学学术年会论文摘要集[C];2013年

6 包国玉;刘广辉;郝廷;;应用锁定加压钢板治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

7 石展英;李百川;赵良军;胡居正;;锁定加压钢板外置治疗近膝关节骨折术后感染[A];第21届中国康协肢残康复学术年会暨第二届“泰山杯”全国骨科青年科技创新论坛论文摘要[C];2012年

8 端木群力;瞿杭波;黄东辉;梅正峰;倪凌之;;锁定加压钢板治疗老年不稳定型桡骨远端骨折[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十四次学术年会暨省级继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2008年

9 端木群立;瞿杭波;;锁定加压钢板内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[A];2012年浙江省骨质疏松与骨矿盐疾病学术年会暨《骨质疏松症诊治进展》专题研讨班论文集[C];2012年

10 邓长青;冉学军;李君慧;胡兆洋;蒲川成;胡波;游红林;;锁定加压钢板固定治疗肱骨干骨折[A];第六届西部骨科论坛暨贵州省骨科年会论文汇编[C];2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 杨慧峰;交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨骨折不愈合的疗效比较分析[D];山西医科大学;2015年

2 刘成日;双锁定加压钢板治疗成人股骨干骨折的临床疗效分析[D];延边大学;2015年

3 余璐鑫;股骨近端锁定加压钢板在临床应用中失效情况及其原因的meta分析[D];重庆医科大学;2016年

4 强毅;股骨干骨不连病因及治疗方法的临床研究[D];第四军医大学;2016年

5 王春雨;LCP结合自体骨镶嵌植骨治疗骨折不愈合的疗效分析[D];山东中医药大学;2016年

6 侯国柱;股骨远端骨折内外侧锁定加压钢板的生物力学比较[D];河北医科大学;2017年

7 刘晓辉;锁定加压钢板技术及其失败原因和对策[D];河北医科大学;2009年

8 李勇;滑槽植骨+锁定加压钢板治疗骨不连的临床研究[D];河北医科大学;2011年

9 崔宜栋;锁定加压钢板治疗四肢长管状骨骨不连的临床应用[D];山东中医药大学;2008年

10 杜明奎;锁定加压钢板固定骶骨骨折的三维有限元分析及临床研究[D];第二军医大学;2006年



本文编号:2081994

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2081994.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ca11c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com