三种伤椎置钉固定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的疗效对比
[Abstract]:[objective] to investigate the clinical effect of posterior internal fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture. [methods] from February 2009 to July 2015, 116 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture were treated by posterior reduction and fixation. According to the operation mode, the patients were divided into three groups. 38 cases were treated with pedicle internal short screw (short screw group). 38 cases were treated with long screw in pedicle of injured vertebrae (long screw group) and 40 cases with internal fixation of short segment pedicle screw in posterior approach (no screw group). [results] Follow-up for 9 ~ 36 months (mean 15.8 months). The anterior height ratio, Cobb angle of scoliosis, sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of injured vertebral canal were significantly improved in the three groups before and after operation (P0.01). Postoperative neurological function was significantly improved compared with preoperative, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The rate of postoperative correction and the improvement rate of postoperative spinal canal area in the short nail group and the non-nail group were better than those in the long nail group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). The long-term correction loss rate and the internal fixation failure rate of the short nail group and the long screw group were lower than those of the non-nail group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the recovery of nerve function among the three groups (P0.05). Postoperative pain score of short nail group was better than that of long nail group and no nail group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications among the three groups. [conclusion] it is a more effective method to treat thoracolumbar burst fracture by adding internal fixation of pedicle of injured vertebrae in posterior internal fixation.
【作者单位】: 山东巨野县人民医院骨三科;青岛市立医院脊柱外科;
【分类号】:R687.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;全军骨折内固定与人工关节置换技术学习班在泰安圆满结束[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2000年12期
2 刘锋,范卫民,陶松年;60岁以下股骨颈头下型骨折50例内固定治疗分析[J];南京医科大学学报;2001年02期
3 黄宏岖;;老年股骨粗隆间骨折微创内固定与开放内固定手术的对比研究[J];中国医药指南;2012年36期
4 蔡梅生,刘旭君,罗铁夫,孟兵,张毅夫,丁珂,,龚兴华;开放性胫腓骨骨折内固定治疗156例报告[J];湖南医学;1994年S1期
5 严清;老年股骨粗隆间骨折采用三种内固定方法的体会[J];中国矫形外科杂志;1999年06期
6 吕汉棠;腓骨内固定治疗重度开放性胫腓骨骨折38例[J];中华创伤杂志;2000年04期
7 徐德义,李云学;内固定治疗肩胛骨骨折3例[J];中国骨伤;2000年06期
8 赵友明;单侧多功能外固定支架与内固定联合治疗开放性粉碎性胫腓骨骨折[J];中国骨伤;2000年08期
9 陈秀民,丁敬沛,王在斌,李百华;经皮钢针内固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折[J];中医正骨;2000年02期
10 那朝阳;内固定治疗开放性胫腓骨骨折46例[J];包头医学院学报;2001年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 申玉才;;胫腓骨开放性骨折的内固定治疗[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
2 周鑫建;黄伟杰;;DHS内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效分析[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
3 牟传勇;周长明;王国华;辛兵;李荣俊;;老年股骨粗隆间粉碎性骨折内固定术后失败再治疗方法探讨[A];第十六届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会暨中西医结合手法治疗骨伤科疾病新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2008年
4 胡p
本文编号:2424110
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2424110.html